Predator-naïve fall field crickets respond to the chemical cues of wolf spiders

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1259-1263

  Storm, Jonathan J ^a,b   Lima, Steven L ^b  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CUE; CRICKET; IMMOBILIZATION; PHYLOGENY; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR; SPIDER;

ACHETA DOMESTICUS; ARANEAE; GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS PENNSYLVANICUS; HEXAPODA; HOGNA HELLUO; LYCOSIDAE; RABIDOSA PUNCTULATA; RABIDOSA RABIDA;

EID: 55949102387     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z08-114     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barnes, M.C., Persons, M.H., and Rypstra, A.L. 2002. The effect of predator chemical cue age on antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Insect Behav. 15(2): 269-281. doi:10.1023/A:1015493118836.
2. Brodin, T., Mikolajewski, D.J., and Johansson, F. 2006. Behavioural and life history effects of predator diet cues during ontogeny in damselfly larvae. Oecologia (Berl.), 148(1): 162-169. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0334-7.
3. Brodt, J.F., Tallamy, D.W., and Ali, J. 2006. Female choice by scent recognition in the spotted cucumber beetle. Ethology, 112(3): 300-306. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01158.x.
4. Brown, G.E., Chivers, D.P., and Smith, R.J.F. 1995. Fathead minnows avoid conspecific and heterospecific alarm pheromones in the faeces of northern pike. J. Fish Biol. 47(3): 387-393. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb01908.x.
5. Chivers, D.P., and Mirza, R.S. 2001. Predator diet cues and the assessment of predation risk by aquatic vertebrates: a review and prospectus. In Chemical signals in vertebrates. Vol. 9. Edited by A. Marchlewska-Koj, J.J. Lepri, and D. Müller-Schwarze. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York. pp. 277-284.
6. Chivers, D.P., and Smith, R.J.F. 1998. Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience, 5(3): 338-352.
7. Csada, R.D., and Neudorf, D.L. 1995. Effects of predation risk on mate choice in female Acheta domesticus crickets. Ecol. Entomol. 20(4): 393-395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1995.tb00473.x.
8. Danner, B.J., and Joern, A. 2003. Stage-specific behavioral responses of Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the presence of lycosid spider predators. J. Insect Behav. 16(4): 453-464. doi:10.1023/A: 1027337405495.
9. Dicke, M. 2000. Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: a multitrophic perspective. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 28(7): 601-617. doi:10.1016/S0305-1978(99)00106-4. PMID:10854737.
10. Dicke, M., and Grostal, P. 2001. Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 1-23. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.113951.
11. Dondale, C.D., and Redner, J.H. 1990. The wolf spiders, nursery-web spiders, and lynx spiders of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, Oxyopidae). Publ. No. 1856, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
12. Eisner, T., and Meinwald, J. 1995. The chemistry of sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92(1): 50-55. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.1.50. PMID:7816847.
13. Hayes, J.L., and Lockley, T.C. 1990. Prey and nocturnal activity in wolf spiders (Araenae: Lycosidae) in cotton fields in the Delta region of Mississippi. Environ. Entomol. 19(5): 1512-1518.
14. Hedrick, A.V., and Dill, L.M. 1993. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46(1): 193-196. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1176.
15. Hedrick, A.V., and Kortet, R. 2006. Hiding behaviour in two cricket populations that differ in predation pressure. Anim. Behav. 72(5): 1111-1118. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.018.
16. Hoffmeister, T.S., and Roitberg, B.D. 1997. Counterespionage in an insect herbivore-parasitoid system. Naturwissenschaften, 84(3): 117-119. doi:10.1007/s001140050358.
17. Ivy, T.M., Weddle, C.B., and Sakaluk, S.K. 2005. Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 272(1580): 2475-2478. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3222.
18. Kats, L.B., and Dill, L.M. 1998. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience, 5(3): 361-394.
19. Kortet, R., and Hedrick, A.V. 2004. Detection of the spider predator, Hololena nedra by naive juvenile field crickets (Gryllus integer) using indirect cues. Behaviour, 141(9): 1189-1196. doi:10.1163/ 1568539042664597.
20. Kortet, R., and Hedrick, A. 2005. The scent of dominance: female field crickets use odour to predict the outcome of male competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59(1): 77-83. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0011-1.
21. Kortet, R., Rantala, M.J., and Hedrick, A. 2007. Boldness in antipredator behaviour and immune defence in field crickets. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9(1): 185-197.
22. Laurila, A., Kujasalo, J., and Ranta, E. 1997. Different antipredator behaviour in two anuran tadpoles: effects of predator diet. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40(5): 329-336. doi:10.1007/s002650050349.
23. Lima, S.L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions: what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience, 48(1): 25-34. doi:10.2307/1313225.
24. Madison, D.M., Maerz, J.C., and McDarby, J.H. 1999. Optimization of predator avoidance by salamanders using chemical cues: diet and diel effects. Ethology, 105(12): 1073-1086. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.10512481.x.
25. Marshall, S.D., and Rypstra, A.L. 1999. Patterns in the distribution of two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in two soybean agroecosytems. Environ. Entomol. 28(6): 1052-1059.
26. Mathis, A., and Smith, R.J.F. 1993. Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. Anim. Behav. 46(4): 645-656. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1241.
27. Matsumoto, Y., and Mizunami, M. 2000. Olfactory learning in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Exp. Biol. 203(17): 2581-2588. PMID:10934001.
28. Murray, D.L., and Jenkins, C.L. 1999. Perceived predation risk as a function of predator dietary cues in terrestrial salamanders. Anim. Behav. 57(1): 33-39. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0986. PMID:10053069.
29. Nentwig, W. 1986. Non-webbuilding spiders - prey specialists or generalists? Oecologia (Berl.), 69(4): 571-576. doi:10.1007/BF00410365.
30. Otte, D., and Cade, W. 1976. On the role of olfaction in sexual and interspecies recognition in crickets (Acheta and Gryllus). Anim. Behav. 24(1): 1-6. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80091-7.
31. Paul, R. 1976. Acoustic response to chemical stimuli in ground crickets. Nature (London), 263(5576): 404-405. doi:10.1038/263404a0. PMID:972676.
32. Persons, M.H., and Rypstra, A.L. 2000. Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology, 106(1): 27-35. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00496. x.
33. Persons, M.H., and Rypstra, A.L. 2001. Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. J. Chem. Ecol. 27(12): 2493-2504. doi:10.1023/A:1013679532070. PMID:11789954.
34. Persons, M.H., and Uetz, G.W. 1997. The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Insect Behav. 10(5): 737-752. doi:10.1007/BF02765390.
35. Persons, M.H., Walker, S.E., Rypstra, A.L., and Marshall, S.D. 2001. Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 61(1): 43-51. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1594. PMID:11170695.
36. Rovner, J.S. 1996. Conspecific interactions in the lycosid spider Rabidosa rabida: the roles of different senses. J. Arachnol. 24(1): 16-23.
37. Schmitz, O.J. 1998. Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs. Am. Nat. 151(4): 327-342. doi:10.1086/286122. PMID:18811324.
38. Schmitz, O.J., and Suttle, K.P. 2001. Effects of top predator species on direct and indirect interactions in a food web. Ecology, 82(7): 2072-2081.
39. Singer, T.L. 1998. Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. Am. Zool. 38(2): 394-405.
40. Slifer, E.H. 1970. The structure of arthropod chemoreceptors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 15: 121-142. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.15.010170.001005.
41. Statsoft Inc. 2003. Statistica. Version 6.1 [computer program]. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, Okla.
42. Sullivan, A.M., Picard, A.L., and Madison, D.M. 2005. To avoid or not to avoid? Factors influencing the discrimination of predator diet cues by a terrestrial salamander. Anim. Behav. 69(6): 1425-1433. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.08.017.
43. Walker, S.E., Marshall, S.D., and Rypstra, A.L. 1999a. The effect of feeding history on retreat construction in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 27(3): 689-691.
44. Walker, S.E., Marshall, S.D., Rypstra, A.L., and Taylor, D.H. 1999b. The effects of hunger on locomotory behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 58(3): 515-520. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1180. PMID:10479366.
45. Young, O.P., and Edwards, G.B. 1990. Spiders in United States field crops and their potential effect on crop pests. J. Arachnol. 18(1): 1-27.
46. Zacharuk, R.Y. 1980. Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25: 27-47. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.000331.