A framework for evaluating semantic knowledge in problem-solving-based intelligent tutoring systems

Proceedings of the 21th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-21

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 409-414

  Fournier Viger, Philippe ^a   Nkambou, Roger ^a   Mayers, André ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; E-LEARNING; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; SEMANTICS;

CONTEXTUAL KNOWLEDGES; GENERAL KNOWLEDGES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MODELS; PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGES; SEMANTIC KNOWLEDGES;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 55849137231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J. and Koedinger, K. 2006. The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains. Proceedings of ITS 2006, 61-70, Springer Verlag.
2. Andersen, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Andersen, J.R, Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. and Pelletier, R. 1995. Cognitive Tutors: Lessons learned, Learning Sciences, 4(2): 167-207.
4. Halford, O.S., Baker, R., McCredden, J.E. & Bain, J.D. 2005, How many variables can humans process?, Psychological Science, 16(1):70-276.
5. Fournier-Viger P., Najjar, M., Mayers, A. & Nkambou, R. (2006). From Black-box Learning Objects to Glass-Box Learning Objects. Proceedings of ITS 2006, 258-267.
6. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L. Z and Wager, W. 1992. Principles of Instructional Design (4th edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7. Kabanza F., Nkambou R. and Belghith K. 2005. PathPlanning for Autonomous Training on Robot Manipulators in Space. Proceedings of IJCAI 2005.
8. Mayers A., Lefebvre B & Frasson C. 2001. Miace: A Human Cognitive Architecture. Sigcue outlook. 27:61-77.
9. Morales, R. and Aguera, A.S. 2002. Dynamic sequencing of learning objects. Proceedings of ICALT 2002. 502-506.
10. Nadel, L. and Hardt, O. 2004. The Spatial Brain, Neuropsychology, 18(3):473-476.
11. Star, J.R. (2000). On the Relationship Between Knowing and Doing in Procedural Learning. Proceedings of the Fourth Intern. Conference of the Learning Sciences, 80-86.
12. Taricani, E. M., and Clariana, R. B. 2006. A technique for automatically scoring open-ended concept maps. Educ. Technology Research & Development, 54(1), 61-78.
13. Tulving, E. 1972. Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. and Donaldson, W. (Eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972, 381-403.
14. Tversky, B. 1993. Cognitive Maps, Cognitive Collages, and Spatial Mental Models, Proc. of COSIT'93, 14-24.
15. Wenger, E. 1987. Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.