Two dimensions of student ownership of learning during small-group work in physics

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 629-653

  Enghag, Margareta ^a   Niedderer, Hans ^a  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Group work; Miniprojects; Physics teaching; Student ownership of learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849127089     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-007-9075-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: making meaning through talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishing.
3. Benckert, S. (1997). Är fysiken könlös? Reflexioner kring ett universitetsämne. Stockholm: Symposion (in Swedish).
4. B. Crawford R. Marx J. Krajcik 1999 Developing collaboration in a middle school project-based science classroom Sci Educ 83 6 701 723
5. E.L. Deci R.J. Vallerand R.M. Ryan 1991 Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective Educ Psychol 26 3&4 325 346
6. Dudley-Marling, C. & Searle, D. (1995). Who owns learning? Questions of autonomy, choice, and control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
7. Enghag, M. (2004). Miniprojects and context rich problems : case studies with qualitative analysis and motivation, learner ownership and competence in small group work in physics. Swedish national graduate school in science and technology. Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping Univiversity, Norrköping, and Department of Mathematics and Physics, Mälardalen University, Västerås. Licentiate thesis.
8. M. Enghag H. Niedderer 2005 Physics learning with exploratory talks during a miniproject-a case study of four girls working with electric circuits J Baltic Sci Educ 1 7 5 11
9. Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P. & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physics work at university. Published on Line in Reseach in Science Education. Available at: http://springerlink.metapress. com/content/1573-1898/?k=Enghag.
10. E.E. Jenkins 1994 Public understanding of science and science education for action J Curric Studies 26 601 612
11. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1991). Learning together and alone: cooperation, competition, and individualization, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. B.J. Kentish 1995 Hypotheticals-deepening the understanding of environmental issues through ownership of learning Austr Sci Teach J 41 1 21 25
13. Lindahl, B. (2003). Lust att lära naturvetenskap och teknik? En longitudinell studie om vägen till gymnasiet. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet PhD Thesis (in Swedish).
14. Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students interest, ownership, and motivation. PhD Thesis, Austin TX.
15. Mortimer, E.F. & Scott, PH. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16. Niedderer, H. (2001). Analyse von lehr-lern-prozessen beim elektrischen stromkreis aus videodaten. In Stefan von Aufschnaiter und Manuela Welzel (Hrsg). Nutzung von Videodaten zur Untersuchung von Lehr-Lern-Prozessen -Aktuelle Methoden empirischer pädagogischer Forschung. Waxmann, Münster.
17. Niedderer, H., Buty, C. Haller, K. Hucke, L. Sander, F. Fischer, H.E. von Aufschnaiter, S. & Tiberghien, A. (2002). Talking physics in labwork contexts - a category based analysis of videotapes. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.) Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 31-40.
18. O'Neill, T. & Barton, A.C. (2005). Uncovering student ownership in science learning: the making of a student created mini-documentary. School Science and Math Journal 105(6), 292-301.
19. OECD (2005). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies 2006, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/30/36645825.pdf.
20. J. Osborne 2003 Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications Int J Sci Educ 25 9 1049 1079
21. Osborne, J. & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum. London: King's College.
22. J.D. Rainer M.W. Matthews 2002 Ownership of learning in teacher education Action in Teacher Education 24 1 22 30
23. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative, vol 1. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R. & Wallace, G. (1996). Conclusion. In J. Rudduck (Ed.) School improvement: What can pupils tell us? London: David Fulton.
25. M.R. Ryan E.L. Deci 2000 Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions Contemp Educ Psychol 25 54 67
26. Savery, J.R. (1996). Fostering student ownership for learning. Bloomington IN: PhD Thesis, Indiana University.
27. J.R. Savery T.M. Duffy 1995 Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework Educ Technol 35 5 31 38
28. Sjøberg, S. (1998). Naturvetenskap som allmänbildning. Lund: Studentlitteratur (in Swedish).
29. Slavin, R. (1988). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
30. SOU (1996). Inflytande på riktigt - Om elevers rätt till inflytande, delaktighet och ansvar: Statens Offentliga Utredningar Utbildningsdepartementet1996:22 (in Swedish)
31. Stemler, S.E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Prac Assess Res Eval 9(4).