On what we see

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 57-80

  Noë, Alva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002723640     PISSN: 02790750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0114.t01-1-00140     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1965). "The intentionality of sensation," Analytical Philosophy, second series. Ed. R. J. Butler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Ayer, A. J. (1940). The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan & Co.
4. Bach-y-Rita. Brain Mechanisms in Sensory Substitution. (New York: Academic Press, 1972).
5. Bach-y-Rita. "Sustitucion sensorielle et qualia," Perception et Intermodalité. Ed. J. Proust. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1996.)
6. Bernet, R., Kern, I. & Marbach, E. (1993). An introduction to Husserlian phenomenology. Evanston, Il: Norwestern University Press.
7. Botvinick, M. & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see [letter] Nature, 391 (6669).
8. Broackes, J. (1992). "The autonomy of color," Reduction, Explanation and Realism. Eds. D. Charles and K. Lennon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Brooks, R. (1991). "Intelligence without representation," Artificial Intelligence, 47, pp. 135-159.
10. Bruce, V. & Green, P. R. (1990). Visual Perception: Physiology. Psychology and Ecology. 2nd Edition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S. & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994). "A critique of pure vision," in Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain. Eds. C. Koch & J. L. Davis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown.
13. Fodor, J. & Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). "How direct is visual perception: some reflections on Gibson's ecological approach," Cognition, 9, pp. 139-196.
14. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Gombrich, E. H. (1960/1961). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
16. Gregory, R. L. (1980). "Perceptions as hypotheses," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 290, pp. 181-197.
17. Gregory, R. L. & Wallace, J. G. (1963). "Recovery from early blindness: a case study," Experimental Psychology Society. Monograph No. 2.
18. Grice, H. P. (1962). "Some remarks about the senses," Analytic Philosophy, first series. Ed. R. J. Butler. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Heil, J. (1983). Perception and Cognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Heil, J. (1987). "The Molyneux Question," Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, pp. 227-241.
21. Hinton, J. M. (1973). Experiences: An Inquiry into Some Ambiguities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Hyman, J. (1989). The imitation of nature. Oxford: Blaekwell.
23. Jackson, F. (1977). Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Jonas, H. (1966). "The nobility of sight: a study in the phenomenology of the senses," The Phenomenon of Life. Ed. H. Jonas. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Keeley, Brian L. "Making sense of the senses: Individuating modalities in humans and other animals." Unpublished manuscript.
26. Tewis, D. (1980). "Veridical hallucination and prosthetic vision," Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59, pp. 239-249.
27. MacKay, D. M. (1967). "Ways of looking at perception," Models for perception of speech and visual form. Ed. W. Wathen-Dunn. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
28. MacKay, D. M. (1973). "Visual stability and voluntary eye movements," Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/3A. Ed. R. Jung. Berlin: Springer.
29. Mach, E. (1959). The Analysis of Sensation and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical. Trans. C. M. Williams. New York: Dover Publications.
30. Martin, M. (1992). "Sight and touch," The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Ed. T. Crane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman & Sons.
32. McClintock, Martha K. (1971). "Menstrual synchrony and suppression," Nature, 229, pp. 244-245.
33. McDowell, J. (1982). "Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge," Proceedings of the British Academy, 68, pp. 455-479.
34. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962) The Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Colin Smith. London: Routledge.
35. Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Moore, G. E. (1918-1919). "Some judgements of perception," Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XIX.
37. Morgan, M. J. (1977). Molyneux's question. Vision, touch and the philosophy of perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Noë, A. (2000). "Experience and experiment in art," Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 8-9, pp. 123-135.
39. Noë, A. (2001). Experience and the active mind. Synthese, 129, pp. 41-60.
40. Noë, A. & O'Regan, J. K. (forthcoming). "On the brain-basis of visual consciousness," Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. Eds. Noë, A. & Thompson, E. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
41. Noë, A., Pessoa, L. & Thompson, E. (2000). "Beyond the grand illusion: what change blindness really teaches us about vision," Visual Cognition, 7, 1/2/3, pp. 93-106.
42. Noë, A. & Thompson, E. (forthcoming). "Introduction: vision and mind," Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. Eds. A. Noë & E. Thompson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. O'Regan, K. (1992). "Solving the 'real' mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory," Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, pp. 461-488.
44. O'Regan, K. & Noë, A. (2001). "A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 5.
45. Peacocke, C. (1983). Sense and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Pessoa, L., Thompson, E. & Noc, A. (1998a). "Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 6, pp. 723-748.
47. Pessoa, L., Thompson, E. & Noë, A. (1998b). "Filling-in is for finding out (Authors' response to commentary)," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 6, pp. 781-802.
48. Ramachandran, V. S. & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc.
49. Rensink, R. (2000). "The dynamic representation of visual scenes," Visual Cognition, 7, 1/2/3, pp. 17-42.
50. Ryle, G. (1949). Concept of Mind. Tondon: Hutchinson's University Library.
51. Sacks, O. (1995). An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales. New York: Knopf.
52. Strawson, P. F. (1979). "Perception and its objects," Perception and Identity: Essays Presented to A. J. Ayer with his Replies. Ed. G. F. MacDonald. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
53. Thompson, E., Noë, A. & Pessoa, L. (1999). "Perceptual completion: a case study for phenomenology and cognitive science," Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Eds. Pettitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., Roy, J-M. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
54. Valvo, A. (1971). Sight restoration after long-term blindness: the problems and behavior patterns of visual rehabilitation. New York: American Federation for the Blind.
55. Varela, F. & Shear, J. (1999). The View from Within: First-Person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
56. von Senden, M. (1932/1960). Space and Sight. Trans. Peter Heath. London: Methuen.
57. Wittgenstein, L. (1964/1975). Philosophical Remarks. Ed. R. Rhees. Trans. R. Hargreave & R. White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Wittgenstein's Lectures: Cambridge 1930-1932. From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.