Why visual experience is likely to resist being enacted

Psyche

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-12

  Jacob, Pierre ^a  

^a INSTITUT JEAN NICOD   (France)

Author keywords

Change blindness; Enaction; Internal forward models of action; Knowledge of sensorimotor contingencies; Two visual systems model of human vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646589953     PISSN: 1039723X     EISSN: 1039723X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. & Frith, C.D. (2000). Why can't you tickle yourself? NeuroReport, 11, R11-R16.
2. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained, London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
3. Dretske, F. (2004). Change blindness, Philosophical Studies, 120, 1-18.
4. Jacob, P. & Jeannerod, M. (2003). Ways of Seeing, the Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans, Behavioral Brain Research, 142, 1-15.
6. Kelly, S.D. (2004). Perception, action, and the constancies (unpublished paper read at the Institut Jean Nicod on December 10, 2004).
7. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
8. Milner, A.D. & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10. O'Regan, J.K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031.
11. Perry, J. (1986). Thought without representation, in Perry, J. (1993) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Simons, D.J. & Rensink, R.A. (2005). Change blindness: past, present, and future, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 1, 16-20.
13. Tsakiris, M. & Haggard, P. (2004). Experimenting with the acting self, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 1-19.
14. Wolpert, D. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209-216.