Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice

Genetics

Volumn 179, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 2147-2155

  Casellas, Joaquim ^a   Medrano, Juan F ^b  

^a IRTA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC STABILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HERITABILITY; INBRED STRAIN; LITTER SIZE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; GENETICS; INHERITANCE; MOUSE STRAIN; MUTATION;

MUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FEMALE; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; LITTER SIZE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MUTATION; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 55749105886     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.088070     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BAILEY, D. W., 1977 Sources of subline divergence and their relative importance for sublines of six major inbred strains of mice, pp. 197-215 in Origins of Inbred Mice, edited by H. C. MORSE. Academic Press, New York.
2. BAILEY, D. W., 1982 How pure are inbred strains of mice? Immunol. Today 3: 210-214.
3. BHUVANAKUMAR, C. K., R. C. ROBERTS and W. G. HILL, 1985 Heterosis among lines of mice selected for body weight. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 52-56.
4. BLASCO, A., 2001 The Bayesian controversy in animal breeding. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 2023-2046.
5. BLASCO, A., D. SORENSEN and J. P. BIDANEL, 1998 Bayesian inference of genetic parameters and selection response for litter size components in pigs. Genetics 149: 301-306.
6. BRADFORD, G. E., and T. R. FAMULA, 1984 Evidence for a major gene for rapid postweaning growth in mice. Genet. Res. 44: 293-298.
7. BURNHAM, K. P., and D. R. ANDERSON, 1998 Model Selection and Inference. A Practical Information Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
8. CABALLERO, A., M. A. TORO and C. LÓPEZ- FANJUL, 1991 The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 127: 89-102.
9. CORVA, P. M., N. C. MUCCI, K. EVANS and J. F. MEDRANO, 2004 Diet effects on female reproduction in high growth (hg/hg) mice that are deficient in the Socs-2 gene. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 44: 303-312.
10. FALCONER, D. S., 1960 The genetics of litter size in mice. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 56(Suppl. 1): 153-167.
11. FESTING, M., 1973 A multivariate analysis of subline divergence in the shape of the mandible in C57BL/Gr mice. Genet. Res. 21: 121-132.
12. FISHER, R. A., 1918 The correlation between relatives under the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52: 399-433.
13. GIANOLA, D., and R. L. FERNANDO, 1986 Bayesian methods in animal breeding theory. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 217-244.
14. GIANOLA, D., R. L. FERNANDO, S. IM and J. L. FOULLEY, 1989 Likelihood estimation of quantitative genetic parameters when selection occurs: models and problems. Genome 31: 768-777.
15. GILKS, W. R., S. RICHARDSON and D. J. SPIEGELHALTER, 1996 Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo, pp. 1-19 in Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, edited by W. R. GILKS, S. RICHARDSON AND D. J. SPIEGELHALTER. Chapman & Hall, London.
16. HENDERSON, C. R., 1973 Sire evaluations and genetic trends, pp. 10-41 in Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association, Champaign, IL.
17. HILL, W. G., 1982a Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 142-145.
18. HILL, W. G., 1982b Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet. Res. 40: 255-278.
19. HILL, W. G., 2007 A century of corn selection. Science 307: 683-684.
20. HINRICHS, D., T. H. E. MEUWISSEN, J. ØDEGARD, M. HOLT, O. VANGEN et al., 2007 Analysis of inbreeding depression in the first litter size of mice in a long-term selection experiment with respect to the age of the inbreeding. Heredity 99: 81-88.
21. HOULE, D., B. MORIKAWA and M. LYNCH, 1996 Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143: 1467-1483.
22. IM, S., R. L. FERNANDO and D. GIANOLA, 1989 Likelihood inferences from animal breeding data subject to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 21: 399-414.
23. JOAKIMSEN, O., and R. L. BAKER, 1977 Selection for litter size in mice. Acta Agric. Scand. 27: 301-318.
24. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1998 Genetic basis of response to 50 generations of selection on body weight in inbred mice. Genetics 148: 1931-1939.
25. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., and W. G. HILL, 1992 Quantitative genetic variation in body size of mice from new mutations. Genetics 131: 693-700.
26. KIRKPATRICK, B. W., J. A. ARIAS and J. J. RUTLEDGE, 1988 Effects of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on long-term reproduction in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 66: 62-69.
27. KIRKPATRICK, B. W., A. MENGELT, N. SCHULMAN and I. C. A. MARTIN, 1998 Identification of quantitative trait loci for prolificacy and growth in mice. Mamm. Genome 9: 97-102.
28. LONG, C. R., W. R. LAMBERSON and R. O. BATES, 1991 Genetic correlations among reproductive traits and uterine dimensions in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 69: 99-103.
29. LYNCH, M., 1988 The rate of polygenic mutation. Genet. Res. 51: 137-148.
30. MACARTHUR, J. W., 1949 Selection for small and large mice in the house mouse. Genetics 34: 194-209.
31. MACKAY, T. F. C., J. D. FRY, R. F. LYMAN and S. V. NUZHDIN, 1994 Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics 136: 937-951.
32. QUAAS, R. L., 1976 Computing the diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics 32: 949-953.
33. RAFTERY, A. E., and S. M. LEWIS, 1992 How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler?, pp. 763-773 in Bayesian Statistics IV, edited by J. M. BERNARDO, J. O. BERGER, A. P. DAWID and A. F. M. SMITH. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. SCHILLING, P., W. NORTH and R. BOGART, 1968 The effect of sire on litter size in mice. J. Hered. 59: 351-352.
35. SORENSEN, D., R. FERNANDO and D. GIANOLA, 2001 Inferring the trajectory of genetic variance in the course of artificial selection. Genet. Res. Camb. 77: 83-94.
36. SORENSEN, D. A., C. S. WANG, J. JENSEN and D. GIANOLA, 1994 Bayesian analysis of genetic change due to selection using Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 333-360.
37. SPIEGELHALTER, D. J., N. G. BEST, B. P. CARLIN and A. VAN DER LINDE, 2002 Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 64: 583-639.
38. STEVENS, J. C., G. T. BANKS, M. F. W. FESTING and E. M. C. FISHER, 2007 Quiet mutations in inbred strains of mice. Trends Mol. Med. 13: 512-519.
39. TAFT, R. A., M. DAVISSON and M. V. WILES, 2006 Know thy mouse. Trends Genet. 22: 649-653.
40. WADE, C. M., and M. J. DALY, 2005 Genetic variation in laboratory mice. Nat. Genet. 37: 1175-1180.
41. WOLFF, G. L., 1961 Some genetic aspects of physiological variability. Cancer Res. 21: 1119-1123.
42. WRAY, N. R., 1990 Accounting for mutation effects in the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix and its inverse. Biometrics 46: 177-186.
43. WRIGHT, S, 1922 Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56: 330-338.
44. YOO, B. H., 1980 Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Lethal and visible mutants with large effects. Genet. Res. 35: 19-31.
45. ZHANG, X., J. WANG and W. G. HILL, 2004 Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleitotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance. Genetics 166: 597-610.