Quantitative relationships between patch test reactivity and use test reactivity: An overview

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 241-248

  Zaghi, Danny ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Patch test; Provocative use test; Repeated open application test

Indexed keywords

2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; 5 CHLORO 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; CHROMIUM; CINNAMALDEHYDE; FORMALDEHYDE; ISOEUGENOL; ROSIN;

CLINICAL TRIAL; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; META ANALYSIS; PATCH TEST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN TEST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; USE TEST;

ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN;

EID: 55749095875     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15569520802251130     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44:201-206.
2. Marrakchi S, Maibach HI. What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition. Dermatol Clin 1994; 12:477-484.
3. Villarama CD, Maibach HI. Correlations of patch test reactivity and repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT). Food Chem Toxicol 2004; 42:1719-1725.
4. Environmental Protection Agency hearings on chromate. http://www.epa.gov/EPAIMPACT/2004/October/Day-04/i21488a.htm. Accessed on 7/24/08.
5. Farm G. Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony - evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78:130-135.
6. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Menné T. Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methods. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34:165-171.
7. Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Frosch P, Lepoittevin JP, Rastogi S, White I, Menné T. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:194-200.
8. Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Menne T. Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34:414-418.
9. Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, Goossens A, Lepoittevin J, Rastogi S, White I, Menné T. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with isoeugenol. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52:260-267.
10. Menné T. Relationship between use test and threshold patch test concentration in patients sensitive to 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/MI). Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24:375.
11. Jensen CD, Johansen JD, Menné T, Andersen KE. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse-off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: an experimental study. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150:90-95.
12. Gruvberger B, Andersen KE, Brandão FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Frosch PJ, Goosens A, Lahti A, Maibach HI, Menné T, Orton D, Seidenari S. Repeated open application test with methyldibromo glutaronitrile, a multicentre study within the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52:19-23.
13. Gruvberger B, Andersen KE, Brandão FM, Bruynzeel DP, Bruze M, Frosch PJ, Goosens A, Lahti A, Maibach HI, Menné T, Orton D, Seidenari S. Patch testing with methyldibromo glutaronitrile, a multicentre study within the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52:14-18.
14. Flyvholm MA, Hall BM, Agner T, Tiedmann E, Greenhill P, Vanderveken W, Freeberg FE, Menné T. Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing a formaldehyde releaser. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:26-33.
15. Basketter D, Horev L, Slodovnik D, Merimes S, Trattner A, Ingber A. Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44:70-74.
16. Zachariae C, Hall B, Cottin M, Cupferman S, Andersen KE, Menne T. Experimental elicitation of contact allergy from a diazolidinyl urea-preserved cream in relation to anatomical region, exposure time and concentration. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53:268-277.