Consumer-driven concept development and innovation in food product development

Consumer-Led Food Product Development

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 342-382

  Moskowitz, H ^a  

^a MOSKOWITZ JACOBS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55649083133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781845693381.3.342     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Acupoll ® http://www.acupoll.com/homenglish/index.html.
2. Beckley J., Moskowitz H.R. Data Basing the Consumer Mind: The Crave It!® 2002, Drink It!®, Buy It!® and Healthy You! Databases, Anaheim, Institute of Food Technologists.
3. Box G.E.P., Hunter J., Hunter S. Statistics For Experimenters 1978, John Wiley &Sons, New York.
4. Cattin P., Wittink D.R. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey. Journal of Marketing 1982, 46:44-53.
5. Cooper R.G. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch 1993, Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Boston, MA. 2nd edn.
6. Dahan E., Srinivasan V. The predictive power of Internet-based product concept testing using visual depiction and animation. Product Innovation Management 2000, 17(2):99-109.
7. Ewald J., Moskowitz H.R. Always on - bringing market research down to the development engineer, closer to the customer, and into the vortex of product development 2001.
8. Fuller G.W. New Food Product Development: From Concept to Marketplace 1994, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
9. Green P.E., Krieger A.M. Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing 1991, 55:20-31.
10. Von Hippel E. Lead users: source of novel product concepts. Management Science 1986, 32:791-805.
11. Khurana A., Rosenthal S.R. Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. Management Review 1997, 38(2):103-120.
12. Literary Digest (retrieved 6 July 2005). http://www.historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5168.
13. Luce R.D., Tukey J.W. Conjoint analysis: a new form of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1964, 1:1-36.
14. Macelroy B. Variables influencing dropout rates in Web-based surveys. Quirks Marketing Research Review 2000, paper 0605. http://www.quirks.com;.
15. Mosley-Matchett J.D. Leverage the Internet's research capabilities. Marketing News April 1998, 32:13.
16. Moskowitz H.R., Gofman A. System and method for performing conjoint analysis. Provisional patent application, 60/538,787, filed 23 January 2004 2004.
17. Moskowitz H.R., Martin D.G. How computer aided design and presentation of concepts speeds up the product development process 1993, 405-419.
18. Moskowitz H.R., Gofman A., Tungaturthy P., Manchaiah M., Cohen D. Research, politics and the Internet can mix: considerations, experiences, trials, tribulations in adapting conjoint measurement to optimizing a political platform as if it were a consumer product 2000, 109-130.
19. Moskowitz H.R., Gofman A., Katz R., Itty B., Manchaiah M., Ma Z. Rapid, inexpensive, actionable concept generation and optimization - the use and promise of self-authoring conjoint analysis for the foodservice industry. Foodservice Technology 2001, 1:149-168.
20. Moskowitz H.R., Itty B., Shand A., Krieger B. Understanding the consumer mind through a concept category appraisal: toothpaste. Canadian Journal of Market Research 2002, 20:3-15.
21. Moskowitz H.R., Beckley J., Mascuch T., Adams J., Sendros A., Keeling C. Establishing data validity in conjoint: Experiences with Internet-based 'mega-studies. Journal of Online Research 2002, http://www.ijor.org/ijor_archives/articles/establishing_data_validity_in_conjoint.pdf.
22. Moskowitz H., Porretta S., Silcher M. Concept Research in Food Product Design and Development 2005, Blackwell Professional, Iowa.
23. Moskowitz H.R., Reisner M., Krieger B., Oksendal K.O. Steps towards a consumer-driven concept innovation machine for 'ordinary' product categories in their later lifecycle 2005.
24. Moskowitz H.R., German B., Saguy I.S. Unveiling health attitudes and creating good-for-you foods: The genomics metaphor and consumer innovative web-based technologies. CRC Critical Reviews in Nutrition and Food Science 2005, 45(3). 265-191.
25. Pawle J.S., Cooper P. Using web research technology to accelerate innovation 2001, 11-30.
26. Systat Systat, the system for statistics 1998, Evanston Systat Division of SPSS.
27. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. Advances in Latent Class Analysis 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. A.L. Mccutcheon, J.A. Hayenaars (Eds.).
28. Vigneau E., Qannari E.M., Punter P.H., Knoops P. Segmentation of a panel of consumers using clustering of variables around latent directions of preference. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12(5-7):359-363.
29. Wells W.D. Psychographics, a critical review. Journal of Marketing Research 1975, 12:196-213.
30. Wittink D.R., Cattin P. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update. Journal of Marketing 1989, 53:91-96.
31. Wittink D.R., Vriens M., Burhenne W. Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections. International Journal of Research in Marketing 1994, 11:41-52.