An interactive benchmark model ranking performers - Application to financial holding companies

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 49, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 172-179

  Lu, Wen Min ^a   Lo, Shih Fang ^b  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG HUA INSTITUTION FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; FHCs; Fixed benchmark

Indexed keywords

LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; PROBLEM SOLVING;

BENCHMARK MODELS; COMMERCIAL BANKS; DECISION MAKING UNITS; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; FHCS; FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANIES; FIXED BENCHMARK; ROLLING PROCEDURES; TRANSFER MODELS;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 55549131489     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Dyson R.G., and Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 39 (1988) 563-576
2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Huang Z.M., and Sun D.B. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 73-91
3. Thompson R.G., Singleton Jr. F.D., Thrall R.M., and Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16 (1986) 35-49
4. Wong Y.H., and Beasley J.E. Restricting weight flexibility in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41 (1990) 829-835
5. Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47 (1996) 136-150
6. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (1993) 1261-1264
7. Seiford L.M., and Zhu J. Infeasibility of super efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR 27 (1999) 174-187
8. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 143 (2002) 32-41
9. Doyle J.R., and Green R.H. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45 (1994) 567-578
10. Li X.B., and Reeves G.R. A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (1999) 507-517
11. Friedman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis and the data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 100 3 (1997) 629-637
12. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., and Barboy A. Academic departments efficiency via data envelopment analysis. Computers and Operations Research 21 5 (1994) 543-556
13. Bardhan I., Bowlin W.F., Cooper W.W., and Sueyoshi T. Models for efficiency dominance in data envelopment analysis. Part I: Additive models and MED measures. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 39 (1996) 322-332
14. Torgersen A.M., Forsund F.R., and Kittelsen S.A.C. Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. Journal of Productivity Analysis 7 (1996) 379-398
15. Zhu J. Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research 123 1 (2000) 105-124
16. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
17. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (1984) 1078-1092
18. Deprins D., Simar L., and Tulkens H. Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M., Pestieau P., and Tulkens H. (Eds). The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement (1984), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North-Holland 243-267
19. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 130 (2001) 498-509
20. Russell R.R. Measures of technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 35 (1985) 109-126
21. Pastor J.T., Ruiz J.L., and Sirvent I. An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (1999) 596-607
22. Seiford L.M., and Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science 45 9 (1999) 1270-1288
23. Angulo-Meza L., and Lins M.P.E. Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research 116 (2002) 225-242
24. Halme M., Joro T., Korhonen P., Salo S., and Wallenius J. Value efficiency analysis for incorporating preference information in DEA. Management Science 45 (2000) 103-115
25. Farrell M.J. The measurement of production efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 120 (1957) 253-281
26. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 15 333-334
27. Baker R.C., and Talluri S. A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers Industry and Engineering 32 10 (1997) 101-108
28. Chakravarthy B.S. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal 7 (1986) 437-458
29. Luo X. Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research 56 (2003) 627-635