Localization of spindle checkpoint proteins in cells undergoing mitosis with unreplicated genomes

Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 890-895

  Johnson, Mary Kathrine ^a   Cooksey, Amanda M ^b   Wise, Dwayne A ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Kinetochore; Kinetochore movement; Mitotic cells with unreplicated genomes; Spindle checkpoint

Indexed keywords

CENTROMERE PROTEIN E; DNA; PROTEIN MAD2;

ANAPHASE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOTION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CENTROMERE; CHO CELL; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAUGHTER CELL; METAPHASE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SPINDLE CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; CELLS, CULTURED; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; GENOME; KINETOCHORES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 55549131175     PISSN: 08861544     EISSN: 10970169     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cm.20310     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Balczon RC. 2001. Overexpression of cyclin A in human HeLa cells induces detachment of kinetochores and spindle pole/centrosome overproduction. Chromosoma 110:381-392.
2. Balczon R, Wilson M, Bhatnagar YM. 2003. Analysis of detached human kinetochores. Chromosoma 112:96-102.
3. Brinkley BR, Zinkowski RP, Mollon WL, Davis FM, Pisegna MA, Pershouse M, Rao PN. 1988. Movement and segregation of kinetochores experimentally detached from mammalian chromosomes. Nature 336:251-254.
4. Brinkley BR, Ouspenski I, Zinkowski RP. 1992. Structure and molecular organization of the centromere-kinetochore complex. Trends Cell Biol 2:15-21.
5. Campbell MS, Gorbsky GJ. 1995. Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J Cell Biol 129:1195-1204.
6. Castro A, Bernis C, Vigneron S, Labbe JC, Lorca T. 2005. The anaphase-promoting complex: A key factor in the regulation of cell cycle. Oncogene 24:314-325. Review.
7. Dobles M, Liberal V, Scott ML, Benezra R, Sorger PK. 2000. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101:635-645.
8. Earnshaw WC, Cooke CA. 1991. Analysis of the distribution of the INCENPs throughout mitosis reveals the existence of a pathway of structural changes in the chromosomes during metaphase and early events in cleavage furrow formation. J Cell Sci 98:443-461.
9. Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA. 1993. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol 122:1311-1321.
10. Herron WB, Lluesma SM, Arana P, Wise D. 2004. Alteration of the metaphase checkpoint by B chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 107:22-27.
11. Jung T, Streffer C. 1992. Effects of caffeine on protein phosphorylation and cell cycle progression in X-irradiated two-cell mouse embryos. Int J Radiat Biol 62:161-168.
12. Li Y, Gorbea C, Mahaffey D, Rechsteiner M, Benezra R. 1997. MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12431-12436.
13. Liu ST, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ. 2006. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J Cell Biol 175:41-53.
14. Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, Earnshaw WC. 2004. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci 117:5461-5477. Review.
15. Mao Y, Abrieu A, Cleveland DW. 2003. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/ inactivation of BubR1. Cell 114:87-98.
16. Mao Y, Desai A, Cleveland DW. 2005. Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol 170:873-880.
17. May KM, Hardwick KG. 2006. The spindle checkpoint. J Cell Sci 119:4139-4142. Review.
18. McEwen BF, Chan GK, Zubrowski B, Savoian MS, Sauer MT, Yen TJ. 2001. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 12:2776-2789.
19. Nasmyth K, Peters JM, Uhlmann F. 2000. Splitting the chromosome: Cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science 288:1379-1385. Review.
20. Pinsky BA, Biggins S. 2005. The spindle checkpoint: Tension versus attachment. Trends Cell Biol 15:486-493. Review.
21. Rieder CL, Salmon ED. 1998. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol 8:310-318.
22. Salmon ED, Inoue T, Desai A, Murray AW. 1994. High resolution multimode digital imaging system for mitosis studies in vivo and in vitro. Biol Bull 187:231-232.
23. Schlegel R, Pardee AB. 1986. Caffeine-induced uncoupling of mitosis from the completion of DNA replication in mammalian cells. Science 232:1264-1266.
24. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED. 1998. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 141:1181-1191.
25. Wise DA, Brinkley BR. 1997. Mitosis in cells with unreplicated genomes (MUGs): Spindle assembly and behavior of centromere fragments. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 36:291-302.
26. Yen TJ, Compton DA, Wise D, Zinkowski RP, Brinkley BR, Earnshaw WC, Cleveland DW. 1991. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J 10:1245-1254.
27. Zinkowski RP, McCune SL, Balczon RD, Rao PN, Brinkley BR. 1989. The centromere and aneuploidy. I. Caffeine-induced detachment and fragmentation of kinetochores of mammalian chromosomes. Prog Clin Biol Res 318:43-60.
28. Zinkowski RP, Meyne J, Brinkley BR. 1991. The centromere-kinetochore complex: A repeat subunit model. J Cell Biol 113:1091-1110.