Ecological restoration and physiology: An overdue integration

BioScience

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 957-968

  Cooke, Steven J ^a   Suski, Cory D ^b  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological restoration; Environmental tolerances; Monitoring; Physiology; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549110091     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/B581009     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Adams CR, Galatowitsch SM. 2006. Increasing the effectiveness of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) control in wet meadow restorations. Restoration Ecology 14: 441-451.
2. Adams SM, Ryon MG, Smith JG. 2005. Recovery in diversity of fish and invertebrate communities following remediation of a polluted stream: Investigating causal relationships.Hydrobiologia 542: 77-93.
3. Adolph EF. 1956. General and specific characteristics of physiological adaptations. American Journal of Physiology 184: 18-28.
4. Ahn C, Moser KF, Sparks RE, White DC. 2007. Developing a dynamic model to predict the recruitment and early survival of black willow (Salix nigra) in response to different hydrologic conditions. Ecological Modelling 204: 315-325.
5. Allen EB. 2003. New directions and growth of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 11: 1-2.
6. Ammar MSA, Amin EM, Gundacker D, Mueller WEG. 2000. One rational strategy for restoration of coral reefs: Application of molecular biological tools to select sites for rehabilitation by asexual recruits. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40: 618-627.
7. Bennett AF. 1987. Interindividual variability: An underutilized resource. Pages 147-169 in Feder ME, Bennett AF, Huey RB, Burggren W, eds. New Directions in Ecological Physiology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Blom CWPM. 1999. Adaptations to flooding stress: Fromplant community to molecule. Plant Biology 1: 261-273.
9. Bradshaw AD. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning 11: 35-48.
10. _. 1987. Restoration: The acid test for ecology. Pages 23-29 in Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD, eds. Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Burggren W, Warburton S. 2005. Comparative developmental physiology: An interdisciplinary convergence. Annual Review of Physiology 67: 203-223.
12. Calow P, Forbes VE. 1998. How do physiological responses to stress translate into ecological and evolutionary processes? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 120: 11-16.
13. Calow P, Sibly RM. 1990. A physiological basis of population processes: Ecotoxicological implications. Functional Ecology 4: 283-288.
14. Carey C. 2005. How physiological methods and concepts can be useful in conservation biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 4-11.
15. Chen SP, Bai YF, Lin GH, Liang Y, Han XG. 2005. Effects of grazing on photosynthetic characteristics ofmajor steppe species in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia, China. Photosynthetica 46: 559-565.
16. Chen YN, Wang QA, Li WH, Ruan X, Chen YP, Zhang LH. 2006. Rational groundwater table indicated by the ecophysiological parameters of the vegetation: A case study of ecological restoration in the lower reaches of the Tarim River. Chinese Science Bulletin 51 (suppl. 1): 8-15.
17. Chown SL, Gaston KJ, Robinson D. 2004. Macrophysiology: Large-scale patterns in physiological traits and their ecological implications. Functional Ecology 18: 159-167.
18. Cooke SJ, Hinch SG, Wikelski M, Andrews RD, Kuchel LJ, Wolcott TG, Butler PJ. 2004. Biotelemetry: A mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 335-343.
19. Costa DP, Sinervo B. 2004. Field physiology: Physiological insights from animals in nature. Annual Review of Physiology 66: 209-238.
20. D'Antonio C, Meyerson LA. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Restoration Ecology 10: 703-713.
21. Davis MA, Slobodkin LB. 2004. The science and values of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 12: 1-3.
22. Depledge MH, Galloway TS. 2005. Healthy animals, healthy ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 251-258.
23. Dobson AP, Bradshaw AD, Baker AJM. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277: 515-521.
24. Dua M, Singh A, Sethunathan N, Johri AK. 2002. Biotechnology and bioremediation: Successes and limitations. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 59: 143-152.
25. Ehrenfeld JG, Toth LA. 1997. Restoration ecology and the ecosystem perspective. Restoration Ecology 5: 307-317.
26. Ehleringer JR, Sandquist DR. 2006. Ecophysiological constraints on plant responses in a restoration setting. Pages 42-58 in Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, eds. Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington (DC): Island Press.
27. Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, eds. 2006. Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Washington (DC): Island Press.
28. Feder ME, Bennett AF, Huey RB. 2000. Evolutionary physiology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 315-341.
29. Gardmark A, Enberg K, Ripa J, Laakso J, Kaitala V. 2003. The ecology of recovery. Annales Zoologici Fennici 40: 131-144.
30. Goldstein DL, Pinshow B. 2006. Taking physiology to the field: Using physiological methods to answer questions about animals in their environments. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 79: 237-241.
31. Gutschick VP, BassiriRad H. 2003. Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology and evolution of plants: Toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences. New Phytologist 160: 21-42.
32. Hobbs RJ, Harris JA. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9: 239-246.
33. Huey RB. 1991. Physiological consequences of habitat selection. American Naturalist 137: S91-S115.
34. Klaper R, Thomas MA. 2004. At the crossroads of genomics and ecology: The promise of a canary on a chip. BioScience 54: 403-412.
35. Kaufman SD, Gunn JM, Morgan GE, Couture P. 2006. Muscle enzymes revealwalleye (Sander vitreus) are less active when larger prey (cisco,Coregonus artedi) are present. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63: 970-979.
36. Lavendel B. 2003. Ecological restoration in the face of global climate change: Obstacles and initiatives. Ecological Restoration 21: 199-203.
37. Lindenmayer DB, et al. 2007. The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research. Oikos 116: 1220-1226.
38. MacMahon JA, Holl KD. 2001. Ecological restoration: A key to conservation biology's future. Pages 245-269 in Soulé ME, Orians G, eds. Research Priorities in Conservation Biology. Washington (DC): Island Press.
39. McKenzie NL, et al. 2007. Analysis of factors implicated in the recent decline of Australia's mammal fauna. Journal of Biogeography 34: 597-611.
40. Montalvo AM, Williams Rice SL, Buchmann SL, Cory C, Handel SN, Nabhan GP, Primack R, Robichaux RH. 1997. Restoration biology: A population biology perspective. Restoration Ecology 5: 277-290.
41. Nelson JA, Gowalt PS, Snodgrass JW. 2003. Swimming performance of blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus) mirrors home-stream current velocity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 301-308.
42. Odum EP. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262-270.
43. Ormerod SJ. 2003. Restoration in applied ecology: Editor's introduction. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 44-50.
44. Orth RJ, Harwell MC, Bailey EM, Jawad JT, Lombana AV, Moore KA, Rhode JM, Woods HE. 2000. A review of issues in seagrass seed dormancy and germination: Implications for conservation and restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 200: 277-288.
45. Osovitz CJ, Hoffman GE. 2007. Marine macrophysiology: Studying physiological variation across large spatial scales in marine systems. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 147: 821-827.
46. Palmer MA, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217.
47. Procaccinia G, Olsen JL, Reusch TBH. 2007. Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350: 234-259.
48. Pullin AS, Stewart GB. 2006. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 20: 1647-1656.
49. Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Roy DB, Warman L, Walker KJ, Rothery P. 2003. Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 65-77.
50. Rajora OP, Mosseler A. 2001. Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest genetic resources. Euphytica 118: 197-212.
51. Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M. 2002. The physiology-life history nexus. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 462-468.
52. Rook AJ, Tallowin JRB. 2003. Grazing and pasture management for biodiversity benefit. Animal Research 52: 181-189.
53. Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM. 2005. Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13: 569-577.
54. Ryder OA. 2005. Conservation genomics: Applying whole genome studies to species conservation efforts. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 108: 1-3.
55. Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I. 1998. Phytoremediation. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49: 643-668.
56. Schiemer F, Keckeis H, Kamler E. 2003. The early life history stages of riverine fish: Ecophysiological and environmental bottlenecks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 133: 439-449.
57. Spicer JI, Gaston KJ. 1999. Physiological Diversity and Its Ecological Implications. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
58. Stevenson RD. 2006. Ecophysiology and conservation: The contribution of energetics - introduction to the symposium. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 1088-1092.
59. Teixeira C, de Azevedo C, Mendl M, Cipreste C, Young R. 2007. Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: The importance of considering stress. Animal Behaviour 73: 1-13.
60. Thomas MA, Klaper R. 2004. Genomics for the ecological toolbox. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 439-445.
61. Thorhaug A. 1990. Restoration of mangroves and seagrasses: Economic benefits for fisheries and mariculture. Pages 265-281 in Beger JJ, ed. Environmental Restoration: Science and Strategies for Restoring the Earth. Washington (DC): Island Press.
62. Tracy CR, Nussear KE, Esque TC, Dean-Bradley K, Tracy CR, DeFalco LA, Castle KT, Zimmerman LC, Espinoza RE, Barber AM. 2006. The importance of physiological ecology in conservation biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 1191-1205.
63. Travis J, McManus MG, Baer CF. 1999. Sources of variation in physiological phenotypes and their evolutionary significance. American Zoologist 39: 422-433.
64. Tuittila ES, Vasander H, Laine J. 2004. Sensitivity of C sequestration in reintroduced Sphagnum to water-level variation in a cutaway peatland. Restoration Ecology 12: 483-493.
65. Van Andel J. 1998. Intraspecific variability in the context of ecological restoration projects. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 1/2: 221-237.
66. Vance RR, Ambrose RF, Anderson SS, MacNeil S, McPherson T, Beers I, Keeney TW. 2003. Effects of sewage sludge on the growth of potted salt marsh plants exposed to natural tidal inundation. Restoration Ecology 11: 155-167.
67. Van Diggelen R, Grootjans AP, Harris JA. 2001. Ecological restoration: State of the art or state of the science? Restoration Ecology 9: 115-118.
68. Varner MJ III, Gordon DR, Putz FE, Hiers JK. 2005. Restoring fire to long-unburned Pinus palustris ecosystems: Novel fire effects and consequences for long-unburned ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 13: 536-544.
69. Vasseur P, Cossu-Leguille C. 2003. Biomarkers and community indices as complementary tools for environmental safety. Environment International 28: 711-717.
70. von Schalburg KR, Rise ML, Cooper GA, Brown GD, Gibbs AR, Nelson CC, Davidson WS, Koop BF. 2005. Fish and chips: Various methodologies validate and demonstrate utility of a 16,006-gene salmonid microarray. BMC Genomics 6: 126.
71. Walker RF, McLaughlin SB, West DC. 2004. Establishment of sweet birch on surface mine spoil as influenced by mycorrhizal inoculation and fertility. Restoration Ecology 12: 8-19.
72. Wallin KF, Kolb TE, Skov KR, Wagner MR. 2004. Seven-year results of thinning and burning restoration treatments on old ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Restoration Ecology 12: 239-247.
73. Webb JK, Shine R. 1998. Using thermal ecology to predict retreat-site selection by an endangered snake species. Biological Conservation 86: 233-242.
74. White PS, Walker JL. 1997. Approximating nature's variation: Selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 338-349.
75. Whiting SN, et al. 2004. Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation. Restoration Ecology 12: 106-116.
76. Wikelski M, Cooke SJ. 2006. Conservation physiology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 38-46.
77. Young JL, Bornik Z, Marcotte M, Charlie K, Wagner GN, Hinch SG, Cooke SJ. 2006. Integrating physiology and life history to improve fisheries management and conservation. Fish and Fisheries 7: 262-283.
78. Young TP, Petersen DA, Clary JJ. 2005. The ecology of restoration: Historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters 8: 662-673.
79. Zedler JB. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 402-407.