Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1476-1486

  Hemmann, Daniel J ^a,b   Allison, Jeremy D ^a,c   Haynes, Kenneth F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b John Ball Zoological Garden   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary trade off; Lepidoptera; Pheromone sensitivity; Speciation; Trichoplusia ni; Wind tunnel

Indexed keywords

SEX PHEROMONE;

EVOLUTION; MALE BEHAVIOR; MOTH; MUTATION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEX PHEROMONE; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; BRASSICA; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; MALE; MOTH; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; BRASSICA; FEMALE; MALE; MOTHS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

BRASSICA OLERACEA VAR. CAPITATA; LEPIDOPTERA; TRICHOPLUSIA NI;

EID: 55549099561     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: 15731561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9546-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. J. D. Allison R. T. Cardé 2006 Heritable variation in the sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella J. Chem. Ecol. 32 621 641
2. J. D. Allison R. T. Cardé 2007 Bidirectional selection for novel pheromone blend ratios in the almond moth, Cadra cautella J. Chem. Ecol. 33 2293 2307
3. J. D. Allison R. T. Cardé 2008 Male pheromone blend preference function measured in choice and no-choice wind-tunnel trials with Cadra cautella Anim. Behav. 75 259 266
4. T. C. Baker W. Meyer W. L. Roelofs 1981 Sex-pheromone dosage and blend specificity of response by oriental fruit moth males Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30 269 279
5. C. L. Bentsen J. Hunt M. D. Jennions R. Brooks 2006 Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus Am. Nat. 167 E102 E116
6. R. K. Butlin 1987 Speciation by reinforcement Trends Ecol. Evol. 2 8 13
7. R. K. Butlin M. G. Ritchie 1989 Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37 237 246
8. Butlin, R. K., and Trickett, A. J. 1997. Can population genetic simulations help to interpret pheromone evolution?, pp. 548-562, in R. T., Cardé, A. K., and Minks (eds.). Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions Chapman and Hall, New York.
9. Cardé, R. T. 1986. The role of pheromones in reproductive isolation and speciation of insects, pp. 303-317, in M. D., and Huettel (eds.). Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior: Progress and ProspectsPlenum, New York.
10. Cardé, R. T., and Charlton, R. E. 1984. Olfactory sexual communication in Lepidoptera: strategy, sensitivity and selectivity, pp. 241-265, in T. Lewis (ed.). Insect Communication Academic, London.
11. Cardé, R. T., and Haynes, K. F. 2004. Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths, pp. 283-332, in R. T., Cardé, K. F., and Haynes (eds.). Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. R. D. Collins R. T. Cardé 1985 Variation in and heritability of aspects of pheromone production in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78 229 234
13. R. D. Collins R. T. Cardé 1989 Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) J. Insect Behav. 2 609 621
14. R. D. Collins R. T. Cardé 1990 Selection for increased pheromone response in the male pink-bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Behav. Genet. 20 325 331
15. R. D. Collins S. L. Rosenblum R. T. Cardé 1990 Selection for increased pheromone titre in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Physiol. Entomol. 15 141 147
16. M. L. Evenden K. F. Haynes 2001 Potential for the evolution of resistance to pheromone-based mating disruption tested using two pheromone strains of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni Entomol. Exp. Appl. 100 131 134
17. M. L. Evenden B. G. Spohn A. J. Moore R. F. Preziosi K. F. Haynes 2002 Inheritance and evolution of male response to sex pheromone in Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Chemoecology 12 53 59
18. C. Gemeno A. J. Moore R. F. Preziosi K. F. Haynes 2001 Quantitative genetics of signal evolution: a comparison of the pheromonal signal of two populations of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni Behav. Genet. 31 157 165
19. A. T. Groot J. L. Horovitz J. Hamilton R. G. Santangelo C. Schal F. Gould 2006 Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 5858 5863
20. B. S. Hansson C. Löfstedt W. L. Roelofs 1987 Inheritance of olfactory response to sex pheromone components in Ostrinia nubilalis Naturwissenchaften 74 497 499
21. B. S. Hansson C. Löfstedt S. P. Foster 1989 Z-linked inheritance of male olfactory response to sex pheromone components in two species of tortricid moths, Ctenopseustis obliquana and Ctenopseustis sp Entomol. Exp. Appl. 53 137 145
22. K. F. Haynes R. E. Hunt 1990 A mutation in pheromonal communication system of cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni J. Chem. Ecol. 16 1249 1257
23. R. E. Hunt K. F. Haynes 1990 Periodicity in the quantity and blend ratios of pheromone components in glands and volatile emissions of mutant and normal cabbage looper moths, Trichoplusia ni J. Insect Physiol. 36 769 774
24. R. E. Hunt B. Zhao K. F. Haynes 1990 Genetic aspects of interpopulational differences in the pheromone blend of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni J. Chem. Ecol. 16 2935 2946
25. J. A. Klun S. Maini 1979 Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system: the European corn borer Environ. Entomol. 8 423 426
26. R. Lande 1979 Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain: body area allometry Evolution 33 402 416
27. R. Lande S. J. Arnold 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters Evolution 37 1210 1226
28. C. E. Linn W. L. Roelofs 1985 Response specificity of male pink bollworm moths to different blends and dosages of sex pheromone J. Chem. Ecol. 11 1583 1590
29. C. E. Linn Jr. M. G. Campbell W. L. Roelofs 1987 Pheromone components and active spaces: what do moths smell and where do they smell it? Science 237 650 652
30. Y. -B. Liu K. F. Haynes 1994 Evolution of behavioral responses to sex pheromone in mutant laboratory colonies of Trichoplusia ni J. Chem. Ecol. 20 231 237
31. Löfstedt, C., and Kozlov, M. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of pheromone communication in primitive moths, pp. 473-489, in R. T., Cardé, A. K., and Minks (eds.). Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. J. S. McElfresh J. G. Millar 2001 Geographic variation in the pheromone system of the saturniid moth Hemileuca eglanterina Ecology 82 3505 3518
33. J. R. Miller W. L. Roelofs 1978 Sustained-flight tunnel for measuring insect responses to wind-borne sex pheromones J. Chem. Ecol. 4 187 198
34. Phelan, P. L. 1997. Evolution of mate-signaling in moths: phylogenetic considerations and predictions from the asymmetric tracking hypothesis, pp. 240-256, in J. C., Choe, B. J., and Crespi (eds.). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. D. Reznick L. Nunney A. Tessier 2000 Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the cost of reproduction Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 421 425
36. W. L. Roelofs 1978 Threshold hypothesis for pheromone perception J. Chem. Ecol. 4 685 699
37. W. L. Roelofs A. Comeau 1969 Sex pheromone specificity: taxonomic and evolutionary aspects in Lepidoptera Science 165 398 399
38. W. L. Roelofs T. Glover X. Tang I. Sreng P. Robbins C. Eckenrode C. Löfstedt B. S. Hansson B. O. Bengtsson 1987 Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84 7585 7589
39. Roff, D. A. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Chapman and Hall, London.
40. Sas 1996. SAS User's Guide: Basics. 6.03th edn.SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
41. A. L. Schek A. T. Groot C. M. Ward C. Gemeno J. Wang C. Brownie C. Schal F. Gould 2006 Genetics of sex pheromone blend differences between Heliothis viriscens and Heliothis subflexa: a chromosome mapping approach J. Evol. Biol. 19 600 617
42. H. H. Shorey R. L. Hale 1965 Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium J. Econ. Entomol. 58 522 524
43. I. Sreng T. Glover W. Roelofs 1989 Canalization of the redbanded leafroller moth sex pheromone blend Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10 73 82
44. Stearns, S. C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
45. G. P. Svensson C. Ryne C. Löfstedt 2002 Heritable variation of sex pheromone composition and the potential for evolution of resistance to pheromone-based control of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella J. Chem. Ecol. 28 1447 1461
46. J. H. Tumlinson C. E. Yonce R. E. Doolittle R. R. Heath C. R. Gentry E. R. Mitchell 1974 Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation of the lesser peachtree borer and the peachtree borer Science 185 614 616
47. J. Zhu B. C. Chastain B. G. Spohn K. F. Haynes 1997 Assortative mating in two pheromone strains of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni J. Insect Behav. 10 805 808