Heritable variation in the sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 621-641

  Allison, Jeremy D ^a   Cardé, Ring T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

(Z) 9 tetradecenyl acetate; (Z,E) 9,12 tetradecadienyl acetate; Cadra cautella; Diel periodicity; Heritability; Lepidoptera; Pheromone titer; Pyralidae; Sex pheromone; Signal variation

Indexed keywords

SEX PHEROMONE; WATER;

HERITABILITY; MOTH; SEX PHEROMONE; SIGNAL;

AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INSECT; LARVA; MALE; MOTH; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; TEMPERATURE;

AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; LARVA; MALE; MOTHS; PHENOTYPE; PUPA; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SEX ATTRACTANTS; TEMPERATURE; VARIATION (GENETICS); WATER;

CADRA CAUTELLA; LEPIDOPTERA; PRUNUS DULCIS;

EID: 33745816715     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: 15731561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-9019-2     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ARNOLD, S. J. 1994. Multivariate inheritance and evolution: a review of concepts, pp. 17-48, in C. R. Boake (ed.). Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. BARRER, P. M., LACEY, M. J., and SHANI, A. 1987. Variation in relative quantities of airborne sex pheromone components from individual female Ephestia cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 13:639-653.
3. BRADY, U. E. 1973. Isolation, identification and stimulatory activity of a second component of the sex pheromone system (complex) of the female almond moth Ephestia cautella (Walker). Life Sci. 13:227-235.
4. BRADY, U. E., TUMLINSON, J. H., BROWNLEE, R. G., and SILVERSTEIN, R. M. 1971. Sex stimulant and attractant in the Indian meal moth and in the almond moth. Science 171:802-804.
5. CARDÉ, R. T. 1986. The role of pheromones in reproductive isolation and speciation of insects, pp. 303-317, in M. D. Huettel (ed.). Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior. Plenum Press, New York.
6. CARDÉ, R. T. and BAKER, T. C. 1984. Sexual communication with pheromones, pp. 355-383, in W. J. Bell and R. T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London.
7. CARDÉ, R. T. and HAYNES, K. F. 2004. Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths, pp. 283-332, in R. T. Cardé and J. G. Millar (eds.). Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. CARDÉ, R. T., CARDÉ, A. M., HILL, A. S., and ROELOFS, W. L. 1977. Sex pheromone specificity as a reproductive isolating mechanism among sibling species Archips argyrospilus and A. mortuanus and other sympatric tortricine moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 3:71-84.
9. CHOW, Y. S., YEN, D. F., and LIN, S. H. 1977. Water, a powerful attractant for the gravid females of Plodia interpunctella and Cadra cautella. Experientia 15:453-455.
10. COFFELT, J. A. and VICK, K. W. 1987. Sex pheromones of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): influence of mating on pheromone titer and release rate. J. Stored Prod. Res. 23:119-123.
11. COFFELT, J. A., SOWER, L. L., and VICK, K. W. 1978. Quantitative analysis of identified compounds in pheromone gland rinses of Plodia interpunctella and Ephestia cautella at different times of the day. Environ. Entomol. 7:502-505.
12. COLLINS, R. D. and CARDÉ, R. T. 1985. Variation in and heritability of aspects of pheromone production in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78:229-234.
13. COLLINS, R. D. and CARDÉ, R. T. 1989. Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Insect Behav. 2:609-621.
14. COLLINS, R. D., ROSENBLUM, S. L., and CARDÉ, R. T. 1990. Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Physiol. Entomol 15:141-147.
15. DELISLE, J. and MCNEIL, J. N. 1987. Calling behaviour and pheromone titer of the true armyworm Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under different temperature and photoperiodic conditions. J. Insect Physiol. 33:315-324.
16. DELISLE, J. and ROYER, L. 1994. Changes in the pheromone titer of oblique-banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana, virgin females as a function of time of day, age, and temperature. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:45-69.
17. ENDLER, J. A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139:S125-S153.
18. FALCONER, D. S. and MACKAY, T. F. C. 1996. Intoduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th Edition Prentice-Hall, New York.
19. FISHER, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. FRY, J. D. 2004. Estimation of genetic variances and covariances by restricted maximum likelihood using PROC MIXED, pp. 11-34, in A. M. Saxton (ed.). Genetic Analysis of Complex Traits Using SAS®. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
21. GEMENO, C. and HAYNES, K. F. 2000. Periodical and age-related variation in chemical communication system of black cutworm moth, Agrotis ipsilon. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:329-342.
22. GEMENO, C., LUTFALLAH, A. F., and HAYNES, K. F. 2000. Pheromone blend variation and cross-attraction among populations of the black cutworm moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93:1322-1328.
23. GEMENO, C., MOORE, A. J., PREZIOSI, R. F., and HAYNES, K. F. 2001. Quantitative genetics of signal evolution: a comparison of the pheromonal signal in two populations of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Behav. Genet. 31:157-165.
24. GREENFIELD, M. D. and KARANDINOS, M. G. 1979. Resource partitioning of the sex communication channel in clearwing moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) of Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 49:403-426.
25. GUSTAFSSON, L. 1986. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability: empirical support of Fisher's fundamental theorem. Am. Nat. 128:761-764.
26. HAYNES, K. F. and BIRCH, M. C. 1986. Temporal reproductive isolation between two species of plume moths (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79:210-215.
27. HOULE, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
28. HUNT, R. E. and HAYNES, K. F. 1990. Periodicity in the quantity and blend ratios of pheromone components in glands and volatile emissions of mutant and normal cabbage looper moths, Trichoplusia ni. J. Insect Physiol. 36:769-774.
29. JURENKA, R. A. 1997. Biosynthetic pathway for producing the sex pheromone component (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate in moths involves a delta-12 desaturase. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53:501-505.
30. KAMIMURA, M. and TATSUKI, S. 1993. Diel rhythms of calling behavior and pheromone production of oriental tobacco budworm moth, Helicoverpa assulta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2953-2963.
31. KONNO, Y. 1986. Time-lag between sex pheromone content and the calling behavior in the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 21:622-624.
32. KUWAHARA, Y. and CASIDA, J. E. 1973. Quantitative analysis of the sex pheromone of several phycitid moths by electron-capture gas chromatography. Agric. Biol. Chem. 37:681-684.
33. LANDE, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain: body area allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
34. LANDE, R. and ARNOLD, S. J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
35. LINN, C. E. JR. and ROELOFS, W. L. 1995. Pheromone communication in moths and its role in the speciation process, pp. 263-300, in D. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer (eds.). Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application. Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
36. LIU, Y. B. and HAYNES, K. F. 1994. Temporal and temperature-induced changes in the emission rates and blend ratios of sex pheromone components in Trichoplusia ni. J. Insect Physiol. 40:341-346.
37. LÖFSTEDT, C. 1993. Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 340:167-177.
38. LÖFSTEDT, C., HERREBOUT, W. M., and MENKEN, S. B. J. 1991. Sex pheromones and their potential role in the evolution of reproductive isolation in small ermine moths (Yponomeutidae). Chemoecology 2:20-28.
39. MCELFRESH, J. S. and MILLAR, J. G. 2001. Geographic variation in the pheromone system of the saturniid moth Hemileuca eglanterina. Ecology 82:3505-3518.
40. MCNEIL, J. N. 1991. Behavioral ecology of pheromone-mediated communication in moths and its importance in the use of pheromone traps. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36:407-430.
41. MIELKE, P. W. JR. and BERRY, K. J. 2001. Permutation Methods: A Distance Function Approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
42. MILLER, J. R. and ROELOFS, W. L. 1980. Individual variation in sex pheromone component ratios in two populations of the redbanded leafroller moth, Argyrotaenia velutinana. Environ. Entomol. 9:359-363.
43. MOUSSEAU, T. A. and ROFF, D. A. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
44. ONO, T. 1993. Effect of rearing temperature on pheromone component ratio in potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella, (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 19:71-81.
45. ONO, T. 1994. Effect of temperature on biosynthesis of sex pheromone components in potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2733-2741.
46. ONO, T., CHARLTON, R. E., and CARDÉ, R. T. 1990. Variability in pheromone composition and periodicity of pheromone titer in potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 16:531-542.
47. PHELAN, L. P. 1997. Evolution of mate-signaling in moths: phylogenetic consideration and predictions from the asymmetric tracking hypothesis, in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi (eds.). Evolution of Insect Mating Systems in Insects and Arachinids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. PHELAN, L. P. and BAKER, T. C. 1987. Evolution of male pheromones in moths - Reproductive isolation through sexual selection. Science 235:205-207.
49. PHELAN, L. P. and BAKER, T. C. 1990. Information transmission during intra- and interspecific courtship in Ephestia cautella and Cadra figulillela. J. Insect Behav. 3:589-602.
50. POPE, M. M., GASTON, L. K., and BAKER, T. C. 1982. Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone gland volatiles from individual Heliothis virescens females. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1043-1055.
51. RAINA, A. K. 2003. Pheromone production in corn earworm: effect of temperature and humidity. Southwest. Entomol. 28:115-120.
52. READ, J. S. and HAINES, C. P. 1979. Secondary pheromone components and synergism in stored-products phycitinae. J. Chem. Ecol. 5:251-257.
53. ROBERTSON, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469-485.
54. ROFF, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
55. ROFF, D. A. and MOUSSEAU, T. A. 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58:103-118.
56. RYNE, C., EKEBERG, M., OLSSON, P. O. C., VALEUR, P. G., and LÖFSTEDT, C. 2002. Water revisited: a powerful attractant for certain stored-product moths. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 103:99-103.
57. SAS 1988. SAS User's Guide, Release 6.03 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
58. SCHAL, C., CHARLTON, R. E., and CARDÉ, R. T. 1987. Temporal patterns of sex pheromone titers and release rates in Holomelina lamae (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1115-1129.
59. SHANI, A. 1990. Calling behavior of almond moth (Ephestia cautella) females kept in glass cages and airborne pheromone deposited on glass surfaces by airstream. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:959-969.
60. SRENG, I., GLOVER, T., and ROELOFS, W. 1989. Canalization of the redbanded leafroller moth sex pheromone blend. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10:73-82.
61. SVENSSON, G. P., RYNE, C., and LÖFSTEDT, C. 2002. Heritable variation of sex pheromone composition and the potential for evolution of resistance to pheromone-based control of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1447-1461.
62. TABACHNICK, B. G. and FIDELL, L. S. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
63. TANG, J. D., CHARLTON, R. E., CARDÉ, R. T., and YIN, C. M. 1992. Diel periodicity and influence of age and mating on sex pheromone titer in gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 18:749-760.
64. TEAL, P. E. A., BYERS, J. R., and PHILOGÈNE, B. J. R. 1978. Differences in female calling behavior of three interfertile sibling species of Euxoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71:630-634.
65. TUMLINSON, J. H., YONCE, C. E., DOOLITTLE, R. E., HEATH, R. R., GENTRY, C. R., and MITCHELL, E. R. 1974. Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation of the lesser peachtree borer and the peachtree borer. Science 185:614-616.
66. WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. 1984. Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects, pp. 281-324, in T. Lewis (ed.). Insect Communication. Academic Press, London.