Bidirectional selection for novel pheromone blend ratios in the almond moth, Cadra cautella

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2293-2307

  Allison, Jeremy D ^a   Cardé, Ring T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

(Z) 9 tetradecenyl acetate; (Z,E) 9,12 tetradecadienyl acetate; Artificial selection; Cadra cautella; Lepidoptera; Pyralidae; Realized heritability; Sex pheromone

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON; SEX PHEROMONE;

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; MOTH; SEX PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MOTH;

ANIMALS; HYDROCARBONS; MOTHS; SEX ATTRACTANTS;

CADRA CAUTELLA; LEPIDOPTERA; PRUNUS DULCIS; PYRALIDAE;

EID: 36849094083     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: 15731561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-007-9386-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allison, J. D., and Cardé, R. T. 2006. Heritable variation in the sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella. J. Chem Ecol 32:621-641.
2. Allison, J. D. and Cardé, R. T. 2007. Male pheromone blend preference function measured in choice and no-choice wind-tunnel trials with Cadra cautella. Anim. Behav. (in press). DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.033.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
4. Arn, H. 2001. The pherolist. Available at http://www.pherolist.slu.se/ index.html.
5. Barton, N. H., and Turelli, M. 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics-how little do we know. Annu. Rev. Genet. 23:337-370.
6. Basolo, A. L. 1996. The phylogenetic distribution of a female preference. Syst. Biol. 45:290-307.
7. Basolo, A. L. 1998. Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:2223-2228.
8. Brady, U. E., Tumlinson, J. H., Brownlee, R. G., and Silverstein, R. M. 1971. Sex stimulant and attractant in the Indian meal moth and in the almond moth. Science 171:802-804.
9. Butlin, R. K., and Ritchie, M. G. 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37:237-246.
10. Byers, J. A. 2002. Internet programs for drawing moth pheromone analogs and searching literature database. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:807-817.
11. Byers, J. A. 2005. Chemical constraints on the evolution of olfactory communication channels of moths. J. Theor. Biol. 235:199-206.
12. Byers, J. A. 2006. Pheromone component patterns of moth evolution revealed by computer analysis of the Pherolist. J. Anim. Ecol. 75:399-407.
13. Cardé, R. T. 2007. Using pheromones to disrupt mating of moth pests, Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management. pp. 122-169, in M. Kogan, and P. Jepson (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Cardé, R. T., and Haynes, K. F. 2004. Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths, Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. pp. 283-332, in R. T. Cardé, and J. G. Millar (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Cardé, R. T., and Minks, A. K. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: Successes and constraints. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40:559-585.
16. Cardé, R. T., Cardé, A. M., Hill, A. S., and Roelofs, W. L. 1977. Sex pheromone specificity as a reproductive isolating mechanism among sibling species Archips argyrospilus and A. mortuanus and other sympatric tortricine moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 3:71-84.
17. Collins, R. D., and Cardé, R. T. 1989. Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Insect Behav. 2:609-621.
18. Collins, R. D., Rosenblum, S. L., and Cardé, R. T. 1990. Selection for increased pheromone-component titre in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Physiol. Entomol. 15:141-147.
19. Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, London.
20. Endler, J. A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139:S125-S153.
21. Falconer, D. S., and Mackay, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn.Longman, New York.
22. Groot, A. T., Horovitz, J. L., Hamilton, J., Santangelo, R. G., Schal, C., and Gould, F. 2006. Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 103:5858-5863.
23. Holloway, J. D., Bradley, J. D., and Carter, D. J. 1987. Lepidoptera, pp. 1-22, in C. R. Betts (ed.). CIE Guides to Insects of Importance to ManCAB International, Oxford.
24. Klun, J. A., Plimmer, J. R., Bierl-leonhardt, B. A., Sparks, A. N., and Chapman, O. L. 1979. Trace chemicals - Essence of sexual communication-systems in Heliothis species. Science 204:1328-1330.
25. Linn, C. E. Jr., and Roelofs, W. L. 1995. Pheromone communication in moths and its role in the speciation process, Speciation and the Recognition Concept. pp. 263-300, in D. M. Lambert, and H. G. Spencer (eds.). John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
26. Löfstedt, C., and Kozlov, M. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of pheromone communication in primitive moths, Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. pp. 473-489, in R. T. Cardé, and A. K. Minks (eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York.
27. Löfstedt, C., Herrebout, W. M., and Menken, S. B. J. 1991. Sex pheromones and their potential role in the evolution of reproductive isolation in small ermine moths (Yponomeutidae). Chemoecology 2:20-28.
28. McElfresh, J. S., and Millar, J. G. 2001. Geographic variation in the pheromone system of the saturniid moth Hemileuca eglanterina. Ecology 82:3505-3518.
29. Mochizuki, F., Fukomoto, T., Noguchi, H., Sugie, H., Morimoto, T., and Ohtani, K. 2002. Resistance to a mating disruptant composed of (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate in the smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes honmai (Yasuda) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 37:299-304.
30. Raina, A. K., Klun, J. A., and Stadelbacher, E. A. 1986. Diel periodicity and effect of age and mating on female sex pheromone titer in Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79:128-131.
31. Raulston, J. R., Snow, J. W., Graham, H. M., and Lingren, P. D. 1975. Tobacco budworm-effect of prior mating and sperm content on mating-behavior of females. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68:701-704.
32. Read, J. S., and Haines, C. P. 1979. Secondary pheromone components and synergism in stored-products phycitinae. J. Chem. Ecol. 5:251-257.
33. Ritchie, M. G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 93:14628-14631.
34. Ritchie, M. G., Saarikettu, M., and Hoikkala, A. 2005. Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Anim. Behav. 70:849-854.
35. Roelofs, W. L., and Brown, R. L. 1982. Pheromones and the evolutionary relationships of Tortricidae. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:395-422.
36. Roelofs, W. L., and Comeau, A. 1969. Sex pheromone specificity: taxonomic and evolutionary aspects in Lepidoptera. Science 165:398-400.
37. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
38. Shorey, H. H. 1970. Sex pheromones of the Lepidoptera, Control of Insect Behavior by Natural Products. pp. 249-284, in D. L. Wood, R. M. Silverstein, and M. Nakajima (eds.). Academic, New York.
39. Sreng, I., Glover, T., and Roelofs, W. 1989. Canalization of the redbanded leafroller moth sex pheromone blend. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10:73-82.
40. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
41. Svensson, G. P., Ryne, C., and Löfstedt, C. 2002. Heritable variation of sex pheromone composition and the potential for evolution of resistance to pheromone-based control of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1447-1461.
42. Tang, J. D., Charlton, R. E., Cardé, R. T., and Yin, C. M. 1992. Diel periodicity and influence of age and mating on sex-pheromone titer in gypsy-moth Lymantria dispar (L). J. Chem. Ecol. 18:749-760.
43. Tumlinson, J. H., Yonce, C. E., Doolittle, R. E., Heath, R. R., Gentry, C. R., and Mitchell, E. R. 1974. Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation of the lesser peachtree borer and the peachtree borer. Science 185:614-616.
44. Webster, R. P., and Cardé, R. T. 1984. The effects of mating, exogenous juvenile- hormone and a juvenile-hormone analog on pheromone titer, calling and oviposition in the omnivorous leafroller moth (Platynota stultana). J. Insect Physiol. 30:113-118.
45. White, C. S., Lambert, D. M., and Foster, S. P. 1995. Chemical signals and the recognition concept, Speciation and the Recognition Concept. pp. 301-326, in D. M. Lambert, and H. G. Spencer (eds.). John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
46. Wilson, E. O., and Bossert, W. H. 1963. Chemical communication among animals. Recent Prog. Hormone Res. 19:673-716.