Currents and sub-currents in innovation flows: Explaining innovativeness using new-product announcements

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1706-1716

  Dolfsma, Wilfred ^a   van der Panne, Gerben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Innovation; Innovation sub currents; New product announcements; Schumpeter Mark I

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS);

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTS; CREATIVE DESTRUCTIONS; ECONOMIC REVIEWS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSES; EXTERNAL-; FOCUS OF ATTENTIONS; INDUSTRY STRUCTURES; INNOVATION FLOWS; INNOVATIVENESS; LONG TIMES; NEW PRODUCTS; NEW-PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENTS; POLICY MAKERS; SCHUMPETER; SCHUMPETER MARK I; SKILLED LABORS; SMALL FIRMS;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 55549099207     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Acs Z.J., and Audretsch D.B. Innovation in large and small firms. Economics Letters 23 (1986) 109-112
2. Acs Z.J., and Audretsch D.B. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review 78 4 (1988) 678-690
3. Acs Z.J., and Audretsch D.B. Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics 59 4 (1987) 567-574
4. Acs Z.J., and Audretsch D.B. Innovation and size at the firm level. Southern Economic Journal 57 (1991) 739-744
5. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., and Feldman M.P. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics 76 2 (1994) 336-340
6. Aghion P., and Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60 (1992) 323-351
7. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., and Howitt P. Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2005) 701-728
8. Arundel A. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy 30 (2001) 611-624
9. Audretsch D.B., and Keilbach M. Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship and innovation in large and small firms. In: Davis J.B., and Dolfsma W. (Eds). The Companion to Social Economics (2008), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
10. Blundell R.W., Griffith R., and van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal 105 (1995) 333-344
11. Boone J. Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 31 3 (2000) 549-569
12. Baumol W.J. Four sources of innovation and stimulation of growth in the Dutch economy. De Economist 152 3 (2004) 321-351
13. Balzat B., and Hanusch H. Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 2 (2004) 197-210
14. Caballero R.J., and Jaffe A.B. How High are the Giants' Shoulders: an Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillover and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1993 vol. 8 (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA pp. 15-73
15. Cameron A.C., and Trivedi P.K. Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1 (1986) 29-53
16. Cohen W.M., and Levin R.C. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In: Schmalensee R., and Willig R.D. (Eds). Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989), North-Holland, New York pp. 1060-1107
17. Cohen W.M., and Klepper S. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal 106 (1996) 925-951
18. Christensen C.M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
19. Dolfsma W. The process of new service development-issues of formalization and appropriability. International Journal of Innovation Management 8 3 (2004) 319-337
20. Dolfsma W. IPRs, technological development and economic development. Journal of Economic Issues 40 2 (2006) 333-341
21. Feldman M.P., and Audretsch D.B. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43 (1999) 409-429
22. Garnsey E. A theory of the early growth of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 7 3 (1998) 523-556
23. Geroski P.A. Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers 42 3 (1990) 586-602
24. Geroski P.A. What do we know about entry?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13 (1995) 421-440
25. Geroski P., Machin S., and Van Reenen J. The profitability of innovating firms. Rand Journal of Economics 24 2 (1993) 198-211
26. Geroski P.A., and Pomroy R. Innovation and the evolution of market structure. Journal of Industrial Economics 38 3 (1990) 299-314
27. Granstrand O. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property (2000), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
28. Kamien M.I., and Schwartz N.L. Market structure and innovation: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13 1 (1975) 1-37
29. In: Kleinknecht A., and Bain D. (Eds). New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement (1993), Macmillan, London & St. Martin's Press, New York
30. Kleinknecht A., van Montfort K., and Brouwer E. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11 (2002) 109-121
31. Klepper S. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1997) 145-182
32. Koeller C.T. Union membership, market structure, and the innovation output of large and small firms. Journal of Labor Research 17 4 (1996) 683-699
33. Lemley M.A., and Shapiro C. Probabilistic patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 2 (2005) 75-98
34. Leydesdorff L., Dolfsma W., and van der Panne G. Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of relations among 'technology, organization, and territory'. Research Policy 35 2 (2006) 181-199
35. Love J.H., and Ashcroft B. Market versus corporate structure in plant-level innovation performance. Small Business Economics 13 (1999) 97-109
36. In: Lundvall B.-A. (Ed). National Systems of Innovation (1992), Pinter, London
37. Marshall A. Principles of Economics (1890), Macmillan, London
38. McCloskey D.N., and Ziliak S.T. The standard error of regression. Journal of Economic Literature 34 1 (1996) 97-114
39. In: Nelson R.R. (Ed). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/European Commission/Eurostat, 1992. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological activities - Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data ('Oslo manual'). OECD, Paris.
41. Reinganum J. The timing of innovation: research, development, and diffusion. In: Schmalensee R., and Willig R.D. (Eds). Handbook of Industrial Organization vol. 2 (1989), Elsevier
42. Santarelli E., and Piergiovanni R. Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: the Italian experience. Research Policy 25 (1996) 689-711
43. Stam E., and Garnsey E. New firms evolving in the knowledge economy. In: Dolfsma W., and Soete L. (Eds). Understanding the Dynamics of a Knowledge Economy (2006), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 102-128
44. Symeonidis, G., 2001. Price competition, innovation and profitability: theory and UK evidence. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2816.
45. Van der Panne, G., 2004a. Entrepreneurship and Localized Knowledge Spillovers. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Technical University Delft, Delft.
46. Van der Panne G. Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 5 (2004) 593-604
47. van Dijk B., den Hertog R., Menkveld B., and Thurik R. Some evidence on the determinants of large- and small-firm innovation. Small Business Economics 9 (1997) 335-343
48. Van der Panne G., and Dolfsma W. The odd role of proximity in knowledge relations-high-tech in the Netherlands. Journal of Economic and Social Geography 94 4 (2003) 453-462
49. Vossen R.W. Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. International Small Business Journal 16 3 (1998) 88-94