Four sources of innovation and stimulation of growth in the Dutch economy

Economist

Volumn 152, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 321-351

  Baumol, William J ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GROWTH; INNOVATION; NATIONAL ECONOMY;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 4344650804     PISSN: 0013063X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:ECOT.0000036574.02833.17     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Philosophical Society, April 2003 Meetings, Session on 'Biomedical Advances, Experienced and Projected, During One Surgeon's Seven Decade Career: In Honor of Jonathan E. Rhodes, MD, DSc (1907-2002 APS 1958),' (Speakers: J.C. Thompson, University of Texas at Galveston, T.E. Starzl, University of Pittsburgh, and R.M. Satava, University of Washington), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: American Philosophical Society (proceedings volume forthcoming in 2004).
2. Baumol, William J. (2002), The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
3. Baumol, William J. (1993), Entrepreneurship, Management and the Structure of Payoffs, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
4. Baumol, William J. (2003), Four Sources of Innovation and Stimulation of Growth in the Dutch Economy, EZ Research series 7, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague.
5. Baumol, William J. (2004) 'Four Sources of Innovation and Stimulation of Growth in the Dutch Economy,' in: G. Gelauff, L. Klomp, S. Raes and T. Roelandt (eds.), Fostering Productivity: Patterns, Determinants and Policy Implications, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
6. Bosma, Niels and Sander Wennekers (2002), 'Entrepreneurship Under Pressure: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor [GEM] 2002: The Netherlands,' Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs.
7. DeLong, J. Bradford (2001), 'The Economic History of the Twentieth Century - Slouching Toward Utopia?,' available at www.j-bradford-delong.net, accessed September.
8. Don, Henk (2002), 'Dutch Growth Potential in the Medium Term,' CPB Report 2001/2, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
9. Economic Report of the President (2002), February 2002, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10. Eliasson, Gunnar, 'The Venture Capitalist as a Competent Outsider,' Department of Industrial Economics and Management, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, forthcoming.
11. European Commission (2002), 'European Innovation Scoreboard 2002,' Technical Paper No. 1, Member States and Associate Countries, European Trend Chart on Innovation.
12. European Commission (2002), 'European Innovation Scoreboard 2002,' Technical Paper No. 4, Indicators and Definitions.
13. European Commission (2003), 'Science and Technology Indicators for the European Research Area (STI-ERA),' Community Research and Development Service, available at http://www.cordis.lu/indicators, accessed July.
14. European Commission (2003), 'Toward a European Research Area,' Science, Technology and Innovation - Key Figures 2002, available at www.europa.eu.int/comm/research, accessed July.
15. European Commission (2003), Eurostat, www.europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat, accessed July.
16. Kreijen, Marcel and Edwin van Scherrenburg (2002), 'Closing the Gap: The Dutch Paradox and the Role of Technology-Based Start-Ups,' paper for the High-Technology Small Firms Conference, 2002, The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Economic Affairs.
17. Maddison, Angus, (2001) The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
18. Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1848), Manifesto of the Communist Party.
19. Ministry of Economic Affairs [Netherlands] (2002), 'Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands: Innovative Entrepreneurship, New Policy Challenges!,' Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
20. National Science Board (2002), Science and Engineering Indicators - 2002, Arlington, VA, U.S. National Science Foundation
21. Neck, Heidi M., Andrew L. Zacharakis, William D. Bygrave and Paul D. Reynolds, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor [GEM]: National Entrepreneurship Assessment, United States of America, 2002 Executive Report, © 2003, available at www.gemconsortium.org.
22. Nelson, Richard R. (1996), The Sources of Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
23. Nordhaus, William D.(1997), 'Do Real-Output and Real-Wage Measures Capture Reality? The History of Lighting Suggests Not,' in: Timothy F. Bresnahan and Robert J. Gordon, The Economics of New Goods, Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press, pp. 29-66.
24. Ordover, Janusz A. (1991), 'A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion,' Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, pp. 43-60.
25. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002), 'OECD Economic Surveys, 2001-2002: Netherlands,' Paris, OECD.
26. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002), 'Education At a Glance: OECD Indicators, 2002,' Paris, OECD.
27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002), 'Main Science and Technology Indicators, 2002-2,' Paris, OECD.
28. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001), 'STI Scoreboard 2001,' Paris, OECD.
29. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001), 'OECD in Figures, 2001,' Paris, OECD, May 2001.
30. Porter, Michael E. (2001): 'Innovation and Competitiveness: Findings on the Netherlands,' presentation at December 3, 2001 Conference on 'Organizing Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy,' The Hague, Netherlands: Directorate-General for Innovation, Ministry of Economic Affairs, April 2002.
31. Reynolds, Paul D. et al. (2001), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor [GEM], 2001 Executive Report, Wellesley, MA, Kansas City, MO, and London: Babson College, Kauffman Center for Industrial Leadership and London Business School.
32. Reynolds, Paul D., William D. Bygrave, Erkko Autio, Larry W. Cox and Michael Hay, 'Cross National Differences in Entrepreneurial Activity,' Global Entrepreneurship Monitor [GEM], 2002, November 20, 2002, available at www.gemconsortium.org, accessed August 2003.
33. Rosenberg, Nathan (1976), Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1947), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 2nd ed., New York, Harper and Brothers.
35. U.S. Department of Labor (2003), 'A Chartbook of International Labor Comparisons: United States, Europe, Asia,' available at www.dol.gov.
36. U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Statement of Peter N. Detkin (2002), Session on 'Business Perspectives on Patents: Hardware and Semiconductors,' FTC Hearings on 'Competition and Intellectual Property Law and Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy,' p. 667, available at http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect.
37. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2001), 'Patent Counts by Country/State and Year, Utility Patents, January 1, 1963-December 31, 2001,' Washington, DC: USPTO.
38. U.S. Small Business Administration (1995), The State of Small Business: A Report of the President, 1994, Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. Van der Wiel, H.P. (2001), 'Does ICT [Information and Communication Technology] Boost Dutch Productivity Growth?,' CPB Document No. 016, December 2001, The Hague, the Netherlands: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
40. Veugelers, R., and B. Cassiman (2003), 'R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing,' Research Report 0325, Department of Applied Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
41. Verhoeven, W.H.J., and A. Bruins (2001), 'Internationale benchmark ondernemerschap 2001,' Zoetermeer, the Netherlands, EIM Business & Policy Research.