The odd role of proximity in knowledge relations: High-tech in the Netherlands

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 453-462

  van der Panne, Gerben ^a   Dolfsma, Wilfred ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

High tech; Knowledge infrastructure; Knowledge spillover; Location factors; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; INFRASTRUCTURE; LOCATION DECISION;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 0141885166     PISSN: 0040747X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9663.00273     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ATZEMA, O.A.L.C. (2001), Location and Local Networks of ICT Firms in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92 (3), pp. 369-378.
2. AUDRETSCH, D.B. & M.P. FELDMAN (1996), R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86(3), pp. 630-639.
3. ANSELIN, L., A. VARGA & Z. ACS (1997), Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42, pp. 422-448.
4. BAPTISTA, R. & P. SWANN (1998), Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More? Research Policy 27, pp. 525-540.
5. BROUWER, E., H. BUDIL-NADVORNIKOVA & H. KLEINKNECHT (1999), Are Urban Agglomerations a Better Breeding Place for Product Innovation? An Analysis of New Product Announcements. Regional Studies 33 (6), pp. 541-549.
6. CARRINCAZEAUX, C., Y. LUNG & A. RALLET (2001), Proximity and Localisation of Corporate R&D Activities. Research Policy 30, pp. 777-789.
7. DE GRIP, A. & A. WILLEMS (1996), Opleidingsniveau en Hoogwaardige Werkgelegenheid; over het Regionale Belang van een Succesfactor. In: O.A.L.C. ATZEMA & J. VAN DIJK, eds., Technologie en de Regionale Arbeidsmarkt, pp. 102-116. Assen: Van Gorcum.
8. ENGEL, D. & A. FIER (2000), Does R&D-infrastructure Attract High-tech Start-ups? Discussion paper no. 0030, Zentrum für Europāische Wirstchaftsforchung.
9. FLORAX, R. (1992), The University, a Regional Booster? Economic Impacts of Academic Knowledge Infrastructure. Aldershot: Avebury.
10. FRITSCH, M. & C. SCHWIRTEN (1999), Enterprise-university Co-operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems. Industry and Innovation 6(1), pp. 69-83.
11. GEROSKI, P., S. MACHIN & J. VAN REENEN (1993), The Profitability of Innovating Firms. The Rand Journal of Economics 24 (2), pp. 198-211.
12. HÄGERSTRAND, T. (1967), Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13. HARRISON, B. (1992), Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional Studies 26, pp. 469-483.
14. HEIJS, J.B.M. & P.M.P.F. SCHMITZ (2001), Clusters of Concentrates. Economisch Statistische Berichten 7, pp. 943-945.
15. HOEN, A. (2001), Clusters: Determinants and Effects. The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
16. JAFFE, A. (1989), Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review 79, pp. 957-970.
17. KLEINKNECHT, A. (2000), Indicators of Manufacturing and Service Innovation: Their Strengths and Weaknesses. In: J.S. METCALF & I. MILES, eds., Innovation Systems in the Service Economy, pp. 169-186. Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. KLEINKNECHT, A. & A.P. POOT (1992), Do Regions Matter for R&D? Regional Studies 26, pp. 221-232.
19. KRUGMAN, P. (1995), Development, Geography and Economic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. MCCLOSKEY, D.N. & S.T. ZILIAK (1996), The Standard Error of Regression. Journal of Economic Literature 34(1), pp. 97-114.
21. MALECKI, E.J. (1991), Technology and Economic Development. New York: Wiley.
22. MALMBERG, A. & O. SOLVELL (1997), Localized Innovation Processes and the Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Firms: a Conceptual Model. In: M. TAYLOR & S. CONTI, eds., Interdependent and Uneven Development. Global-local Perspectives, pp. 119-142. Aldershot: Ashgate.
23. MANSFIELD, E. & J.Y. LEE (1996), The Modern University: Contributor to Industrial Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support. Research Policy 25, pp. 1047-1058.
24. MANSHANDEN, W. (1996), Zakelijke Diensten en Regionaal-economische Ontwikkeling (Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam).
25. MARKTSELECT BV (2002), De DM-CD, Amsterdam: Applidata BV.
26. MARSHALL, A. (1920 [1891]), Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan, 8th edn.
27. MARTIN, R. (1999), The New Geographical turn in Economics: Some Critical Reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(1), pp. 65-91.
28. MASKELL, P. & A. MALMBERG (1999), Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23, pp. 167-183.
29. MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS (1997), Innovatie in de Regio - Provinciale Innovatieprofielen. The Hague/Amsterdam: EZ/SEO.
30. NOOTEBOOM, B. (2000), Learning and Innovation in Organisations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford UP.
31. OECD (1986), OECD Science and Technology Indicators, NO 2: R&D, Invention and Competitiveness. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
32. OUWERSLOOT, H. & P. RIETVELD (2000), The Geography of R&D: Tobit Analysis and a Bayesian Approach to Mapping R&D Activities in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A 32, pp. 1673-1688.
33. RICHARDSON, H.W (1973), The Economics of Urban Size. Westmead, Farnborough: Saxon House.
34. STERNBERG, R. (1999), Innovative Linkages and Proximity: Empirical Results from Recent Surveys of Small and Medium Sized Finns in German Regions. Regional Studies 33(6), pp. 529-540.
35. STICHTING ECONOMISCH ONDERZOEK (1997), De Amsterdamse Binnenstad als Economische Regio. Amsterdam: SEO.
36. STORPER, M. (1997), The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, pp. 59-82. New York: Guilford Press.
37. SWANN, P. (1999), Innovation and the Size of Industrial Clusters in Europe. In: A. GAMBARDELLA & F. MALERBA, eds., The Organization of Economic Innovation in Europe, pp. 103-124. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
38. VAN DER PANNE, G. & W.A. DOLFSMA (2001), Hightech door Nederland. Economisch Statistische Berichten 86, pp. 584-586.
39. VAN DER VEGT, C., J. MUSKENS & W. MANSHANDEN (2000), Groei, Arbeid en Ruimte - Scenario's van Hoge Groei in de Regio Amsterdam. Amsterdam: SEO.
40. VAN DER VEGT, C., J.G. LAMBOOY, E. VAN ESTERIK, A.P. POOT & D. WEBBINK (1995), Economie en Arbeidsmarkt in de Economische Regio Amsterdam. Amsterdam: SEO.
41. VAN OORT, F. (2002), Innovation and Agglomeration Economies in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93(3), pp. 344-360.
42. WEISS, M.A. (1995), High-technology Industries and the Future of Employment. In: C.S. BERTUGLIA, M.M. FISCHER & G. PRETO, eds., Technological Change, Economic Development and Space, pp. 80-143. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
43. WEVER, E. & E. STAM (1999), Clusters of High Technology SMEs: the Dutch Case. Regional Studies 33, pp. 391-400.
44. WINTER, S.G. (1984), Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, pp. 287-320.
45. WINTJES, R. (2001), Regionaal-economische Effecten van Buitenlandse Bedrijven (Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht).