메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1101-

To peer review or not to peer review: That seems to be the question

(1)  Stanley, Robert J a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; FORGERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 33644843015     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.185.5.1101     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (3)

References (3)
  • 1
    • 85041734972 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Flaws are found in validating medical studies scholars' reviews
    • August 15, section 4
    • Kranish M. Flaws are found in validating medical studies scholars' reviews. Boston Globe, August 15, 2005:section 4
    • (2005) Boston Globe
    • Kranish, M.1
  • 3
    • 29844444319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript
    • Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR 2005; 185:848-854
    • (2005) AJR , vol.185 , pp. 848-854
    • Provenzale, J.M.1    Stanley, R.J.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.