Detection of collision events on curved trajectories: Optical information from invariant rate-of-bearing change

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1314-1324

  Ni, Rui ^a   Andersen, George J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55449108411     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP/70.7.1314     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J., CISNEROS, J., SAIDPOUR, A., & ATCHLEY, P. (1999). Speed, size and edge rate information for the detection of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 256-279.
2. ANDERSEN, G. J., CISNEROS, J., SAIDPOUR, A., & ATCHLEY, P. (2000). Age-related differences in collision detection during deceleration. Psychology & Aging, 15, 241-252.
3. ANDERSEN, G. J., & ENRIQUEZ, A. (2006). Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions. Psychology & Aging, 21, 74-85.
4. ANDERSEN, G. J., & KIM, R. D. (2001). Perceptual information and attentional constraints in visual search of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1039-1056.
5. ANDERSEN, G. J., & SAUER, C. W. (2004). Optical information for collision detection during deceleration. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 135, pp. 93-108). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. BINGHAM, G. P., & ZAAL, F. T. (2004). Why tau is probably not used in guide reaches. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 135, pp. 371-388). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. BOOTSMA, R. J., & VAN WIERINGEN, P. C. W. (1990). Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 21-29.
8. DELUCIA, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 738-748.
9. DELUCIA, P. R. (2004a). Multiple sources of information influence time-to-contact judgments: Do heuristics accommodate limits in sensory and cognitive processes? In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 135, pp. 243-286). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. DELUCIA, P. R. (2004b). Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 287-304.
11. DELUCIA, P. R. (2005). Does binocular disparity or familiar size information override effects of relative size on judgments of time to contact? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 865-886.
12. DELUCIA, P. R., KAISER, M. K., BUSH, J. M., MEYER, L. E., & SWEET, B. T. (2003). Information integration in judgments of time to contact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1165-1189.
13. DELUCIA, P. R., KAISER, M. K., MEYER, L. E., & BUSH, J. M. (2003). Judgments about collision in younger and older drivers. Transportation Research, 6, 63-80.
14. DELUCIA, P. R., & WARREN, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 783-798.
15. EVANS, L. (2004). Traffic safety. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Science Serving Society.
16. FAJEN, B. R. (2005). The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1107-1123.
17. FLACH, J. M., & WARREN, R. (1995). Active psychophysics: The relation between mind and what matters. In J. M. Flach, P. A. Hancock, J. K. Caird, & K. J. Vicente (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human- machine systems (Vol. 1, pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. HECHT, H., & SAVELSBERGH, G. J. P. (EDS.) (2004). Time-to-contact (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 135). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. KERZEL, D., HECHT, H., & KIM, N.-G. (2001). Time-to-passage judgments on circular trajectories are based on relative optical acceleration. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1153-1170.
20. KIEFER, R. J., FLANNAGAN, C. A., & JEROME, C. J. (2006). Time-tocollision judgments under realistic driving conditions. Human Factors, 48, 334-345.
21. KIM, N.-G., & GROCKI, M. J. (2006). Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments. Vision Research, 46, 1946-1958.
22. KIM, N.-G., TURVEY, M. T., & CARELLO, C. (1993). Optical information about the severity of upcoming contacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 179-193.
23. LEE, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time to collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
24. LEE, D. N., YOUNG, D. S., REDDISH, P. E., LOUGH, S., & CLAYTON, T. M. H. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 333-346.
25. MARASCUILO, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 35, 237-243.
26. NORTHRIDGE, M. E., NEVITT, M. C., KELSEY, J. L., & LINK, B. (1995). Home hazards and falls in the elderly: The role of health and functional status. American Journal of Public Health, 58, 509-515.
27. REGAN, D., & GRAY, R. (2001). Hitting what one wants to hit and missing what one wants to miss. Vision Research, 41, 3321-3329.
28. RIEGER, J. H. (1983). Information in optical flows induced by curved paths of observation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 73, 339-344.
29. ROCK, P. B., & HARRIS, M. G. (2006). ô as a potential control variable for visually guided braking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 251-267.
30. SALGADO, O. J., & GREENBERG, R. (1994). Factors associated with falling in elderly hospital patients. Gerontology, 40, 325-331.
31. SAVELSBERGH, G. J. P., & BOOTSMA, R. J. (1994). Perception-action coupling in hitting and catching. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25, 331-343.
32. SCHIFF, W., OLDAK, R., & SHAH, V. (1992). Aging persons' estimates of vehicular motion. Psychology & Aging, 7, 518-525.
33. TRESILIAN, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 865-876.
34. VOGEL, K. (2003). A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 427-433.
35. WANN, J. P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1031-1048.
36. WEERDESTEYN, V., NIENHUIS, B., & DUYSENS, J. (2005). Advancing age progressively affects obstacle avoidance skills in the elderly. Human Movement Science, 24, 865-880.
37. YILMAZ, E. H., & WARREN, W. H., JR. (1995). Visual control of braking: A test of the ÿô hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 996-1014.
38. ZAAL, F. T. J. M., & BOOTSMA, R. J. (2004). The use of time-to-contact information for the initiation of hand closure in natural prehension. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to- contact (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 135, pp. 389-420). Amsterdam: Elsevier.