Better than average? When can we say that subsampling of items is better than statistical summary representations?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1325-1326

  Ariely, Dan ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 55449095323     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1325     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. ARIELY, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157-162.
2. CHONG, S. C., & TREISMAN, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393-404.
3. CHONG, S. C., & TREISMAN, A. (2005a). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1-13.
4. CHONG, S. C., & TREISMAN, A. (2005b). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45, 891-900.
5. MYCZEK, K., & SIMONS, D. J. (2008). Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 772-788.