Of mice and men: Within gender variation in strategic behavior

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 421-432

  Castillo, Marco E ^a   Cross, Philip J ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beliefs; Experimental economics; Noncooperative games

Indexed keywords

EID: 55349134928     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: 10902473     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2008.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andreoni J., and Miller J. Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preference for altruism. Econometrica 70 3 (2002) 737-753
2. Andreoni J., and Vesterlund L. Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econ. 116 (2001) 293-312
3. Camerer C. Social preferences in dictator, ultimatum, and trust games. Behavioral Game Theory (2003), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Carpenter J., Verhoogen E., and Burks S. The effect of stakes in distribution experiments. Econ. Letters 86 (2005) 393-398
5. Castillo, M., Carter, M., 2006. Identifying social effects with economic field experiments. Mimeo, Georgia Institute of Technology
6. Costa-Gomes, M., Weizsacher, G., 2005. Stated beliefs and play in normal-form games. Mimeo, London School of Economics
7. Croson R. Thinking like a game theorist: Factors affecting the frequency of equilibrium play. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 41 (2000) 299-314
8. Croson R., and Buchan N. Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games. Amer. Econ. Rev. 89 (1999) 386-391
9. Croson, R., Gneezy, U., 2004. Gender differences in preferences. Mimeo, University of Chicago
10. Dwyer P., Gilkeson J., and List J. Gender differences in revealed risk taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors. Econ. Letters 76 (2002) 151-158
11. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Econ. J. 108 (1998) 726-735
12. Eckel C., and Grossman P. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Econ. Inquiry 39 (2001) 171-188
13. Forsythe R., Horowitz J., Savin N., and Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining games. Games Econ. Behav. 6 (1994) 347-369
14. Gerhart B., and Rynes S. Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. J. Appl. Psychol. 76 2 (1991) 256-262
15. Gilboa I., and Schmeidler D. A derivation of expected utility maximization in the context of a game. Games Econ. Behav. 44 (2003) 184-194
16. Gneezy U., Niederle M., and Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econ. 118 3 (2003) 1049-1074
17. Goldin C. Understanding the Gender Gap (1990), Oxford Univ. Press, New York
18. Hudgens G., and Fatkin L. Sex differences in risk taking: Repeated sessions on a computer-simulated task. J. Psychol. 119 (1985) 197-206
19. Jianakoplos N., and Bernasek A. Are women more risk averse?. Econ. Inquiry 34 (1998) 620-630
20. Niederle, M., Vesterlund, L., 2006. Do women shy away from competition? Mimeo, University of Pittsburgh
21. Nyarko Y., and Schotter A. An experimental study of belief learning using elicited beliefs. Econometrica 70 (2002) 971-1005
22. Petrie, R., 2004. Trusting appearances and reciprocating looks: Experimental evidence on gender and race preferences. Mimeo, Georgia State University
23. Roth A. Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel J., and Roth A. (Eds). Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
24. Solnick S. Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Econ. Inquiry 39 (2001) 189-200
25. Wood R., Corcoran M., and Courant P. Pay differences among the highly paid: The male-female earnings gap in lawyers' salaries. J. Lab. Econ. 11 3 (1993) 417-441