Effective response to RFQs and supplier development: A supplier's perspective

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 461-470

  Narasimhan, Ram ^a   Talluri, Srinivas ^a   Mahapatra, Santosh ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematical programming; Multi attribute bids; Procurement; RFQ procurement

Indexed keywords

MACHINE DESIGN; PURCHASING;

MULTI-ATTRIBUTES; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES; PROCUREMENT; QUALITY AND DELIVERY; REQUEST FOR QUOTES; RFQ PROCUREMENT; SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT; WINNER DETERMINATION;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 55349130952     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akinc, Umit, 1993. Selecting a set of vendors in manufacturing environment. Journal of Operations Management 11, 107-122.
2. Beil, D.R., Wein, L.M., 2003. An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Science 49 (11), 1529-1545.
3. Bichler, M., Kaukal, M., Segev, A., 1999. Multi-attribute auctions for electronic procurement. In: Proceedings of the First IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Yorktown Heights, NY, March 18-19.
4. Bichler, M., 2000. An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems 29 (2000), 249-268.
5. Bichler, M., Kalagnanam. J., 2003. Bidding languages and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions. IBM Research Report RC 22478.
6. Branco, F., 1997. The design of multidimensional auctions. The Rand Journal of Economics 28 (1), 63-81.
7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Sun. D.B., Huang. Z.M., 1990. Polyhedral Coneratio models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics 46, 73-91.
9. Che, Y., 1993. Design competition through multi-dimensional auctions. The Rand Journal of Economics 24 (4), 668-680.
10. Cheung, S.O., Lam, T.I., Leung, M.Y., Wan, Y.W., 2001. An analytic hierarchy process based procurement selection method. Construction Management and Economics 19 (4), 427-437.
11. Dozzi, S.P., AbouRizk, S.M., Schroeder, S.L., 1996. Utility theory model for bid mark-up decisions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE 122 (2), 119-124.
12. Gallien, J., Wein, L.M., 2005. Design and analysis of a smart market for industrial procurement. Management Science 51 (1), 76-91.
13. Hax, A.C., Majluf, N.S., 1988. The concept of strategy and strategy formation process. Interfaces 18 (3), 99-109.
14. Iyengar, V.S., Lee, J., Campbell, M., 2001. Q-Eval: Evaluating multiple attribute items using queries. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, October 14-17 Tampa, FL, USA.
15. Kasilingam, R., Lee, C., 1996. Selection of vendors - A mixed-integer programming approach. Computer and Industrial Engineering 31, 347-350.
16. Koppius, O., 2002. Information Architecture and Electronic Market Performance. Ph.D. Disseration. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
17. Lee, J., Lee, S., Lee, S., 2003. A framework for winner determination algorithm for internet auctions. Working Paper, IBM T.J., Watson Research Center, New York, USA.
18. Leskelä, R., Teich, J., Wallenius, H., Wallenius. J., 2007. Decision support for multi-unit combinatorial bundle auctions. Decision Support Systems (43), 420-434.
19. Liu, J., Ding. F-Y., Lall. V., 2000. Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5 (3), 143-150.
20. Marzouk, M., Moselhi, O., 2003. A decision support tool for construction bidding. Construction Innovation 3, 111-124.
21. Narasimhan, R., Talluri. S., Mahapatra, S., 2006. Multi-product, multicriteria model for supplier selection with product life cycle considerations. Decision Sciences Journal 37 (4), 577-603.
22. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., 2005. A note on methodology for supply base optimization. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 52 (1), 130-139.
23. Teich, J., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., 1999. Multiple issue auction and market algorithms for the world wide web. Decision Support Systems and Electronic Commerce 26 (1), 409-466.
24. Teich, J., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., Koppius, O., 2004. Emerging multiple issue e-auctions. European Journal of Operational Research 159(1), 1-16.
25. Teich, J., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., Zaitsev, A., 2006. A multi-attribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: Theoretical foundations. European Journal of Operational Research 175 (1), 90-100.
26. Thompson, R.C., Langemeier, L.N., Lee, C.T., Thrall, R.M., 1990. The role of Multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas Farming. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1/2), 93-108.
27. Vijayan, J., 2000. Vendors offer tools to sell customized parts. Computerworld 34(15), 73.
28. Weber, C.A., 1996. A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Management 1(1), 28.
29. Weber, CA., Ellram, L.M., 1993. Supplier selection using multi-objective programming: A decision support system approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 23 (2), 3.
30. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Desai, A., 2000. Vendor: A structured approach to vendor selections and negotiation. Journal of Business Logistics 21 (1), 135-167.
31. Wise, R., Morrison, D., 2000. Beyond the exchange: The future of B2B. Harvard Business Review 78 (6), 86-96.