Hard-of-Hearing and deaf clients. Using the WISC-IV with clients who are hard-of-hearing or deaf

WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 351-380

  Braden, Jeffery P ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55349122399     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012564931-5/50012-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Akamatsu C.T., Musselman C., Zwiebel A. Nature versus nurture in the development of cognition in deaf people. The deaf child in the family and at school: Essays in honor of Kathryn P. Meadow-Orlans 2000, 255-274. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. P.E. Spencer, C.J. Erting, M. Marschark (Eds.).
2. Alade E.B. Determining intelligence quotients of Nigerian deaf children with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised. Early Child Development and Care 1992, 80:103-107.
3. National Council on Measurement in Education Standards for educational and psychological testing 1999, American Educational Research Association, American Psychological AssociationAmerican Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. 3rd ed.
4. Ethnical principles of psychologists and code of conduct 2002, Available: http://www.apa.org/ethics/, American Psychological AssociationAmerican Psychological Association, Author, Washington, DC.
5. Anderson R.J., Sisco F.H. Standardization of the WISC-R Performance Scale for deaf children 1977, Series T, No. 1, Office of Demographic Studies, Gallaudet College. Available from ERIC Document No. ED150801, Gallaudet College, Washington, DC.
6. Braden J.P. The structure of nonverbal intelligence in deaf and hearing subjects. American Annals of the Deaf 1985, 131:496-501.
7. Braden J.P. WISC R deaf norms reconsidered. Journal of School Psychology 1985, 23:375-382.
8. Braden J.P. An explanation of the superior Performance IQs of deaf children of deaf parents. American Annals of the Deaf 1987, 132:263-266.
9. Braden J.P. Do deaf persons have a characteristic psychometric profile on the Wechsler Performance Scales?. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1990, 8:518-526.
10. Braden J.P. Deafness, deprivation, and IQ 1994, Plenum, New York.
11. Braden J.P. Deafness and hearing loss. Encyclopedia of psychology 2000, 441-444. American Psychological Association/Oxford University Press, Washington, DC/Oxford. A.E. Kazdin (Ed.).
12. Braden J.P. Accommodating clients with disabilities on the WAIS-III/WMS. Use of the WAIS-III/WMS in clinical practice 2003, 451-486. Houghton Mifflin, New York. D. Saklofske, D. Tulsky (Eds.).
13. Braden, J. P. & Athanasiou, M. S. (in press). A comparative review of nonverbal measures of intelligence. In D. P. Flangan and P. A. Harrison (Eds.) Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
14. Braden J.P., Elliott S.N. Accommodations on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales. Intelligence Scales 2003, 135-143. (5th ed.), Itasca, IL, Riverside. 5th ed. G. Roid (Ed.).
15. Braden J.P., Kostrubala C., Reed J. Why do deaf children score differently on performance v. motor-reduced nonverbal intelligence tests?. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1994, 12:357-363.
16. Braden J.P., Hannah J.M. Assessment of hearing impaired and deaf children with the WISC-III. Use of the WISC-III in clinical practice 1998, 175-201. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. D. Saklofske, A. Prifiter (Eds.).
17. Braden J.P., Kratochwill T.R. Treatment utility of assessment: Myths and realities. School Psychology Review 1997, 26(3):475-485.
18. Braden J.P., Maller S.J., Paquin M.M. The effects of residential versus day placement on the Performance IQs of children with hearing impairment. Journal of Special Education 1993, 26:423-433.
19. Braden J.P., Wollack J.A., Allen T.E. Reply to Kishor: Choosing the right metric. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1995, 13(3):250-265.
20. Brauer B.A., Braden J.P., Pollard R.Q., Hardy-Braz S.T. Deaf and hard of hearing people. Test interpretation and diversity: Achieving equity in assessment 1998, 297-315. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. J. Sandoval, C.L. Frisby, K.F. Geisinger, J.D. Scheuneman, J.R. Grenier (Eds.).
21. Carroll J.B. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York.
22. Elliott S.N., Braden J.P., White J.L. Assessing one and all: Educational accountability for students with disabilities 2001, Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA.
23. Flanagan D.P., Ortiz S.O. Best practices in intellectual assessment: Future directions. Best practices in school psychology 2002, 1351-1372. National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesdsa, MD. 4th ed. A. Thomas, J.P. Grimes (Eds.).
24. Ford L., Braden J.P. Equitable psychological assessment for languageminority learners: Theory, research, and practice. Symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association 1996, Aug.
25. Freeman S.T. Cultural and linguistic bias in mental health evaluations of deaf people. Rehabilitation Psychology 1989, 34(1):51-63.
26. Gallaudet Research Institute 2001 2002 regional and national survey 2002, Available: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/, Author, Washington, DC.
27. Gustason G., Zawolkow E. Signing exact English 1993, Modern Signs Press, Rossmoor, Ca.
28. Hardy-Braz S., Sattler J.M. Hearing Impairments. Assessment of children: Behavioral and clinical applications 2002, 377-389. Author, San Diego, CA. J.M. Sattler (Ed.).
29. Hunt H.L. Assessing intelligence in deaf children: Is the Verbal Scale of the WISC-III valid?. Dissertation Abstracts International 1998, 59(1):456B.
30. Jenkinson J. Use of the WISC-R Performance Scale with hearing-impaired children: A review. Psychological Test Bulletin 1989, 2(1):33-38.
31. Kamphaus R.W. Clinical assessment of child and adolescent intelligence 2001, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
32. Kaufman A.S., Lichtenberger E.O. Essentials of WISC-III and WPPSI-R assessment 2000, Wiley, New York.
33. Kelly M., Braden J.P. Criterion-related validity of the WISC-R Performance Scale with the Stanford Achievement Test-Hearing Impaired Edition. Journal of School Psychology 1990, 28:147-151.
34. Kishor N. Evaluating predictive validity: A rejoinder to Braden et al. (1995). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1995, 13(3):266-270.
35. Kishor N. Evaluating predictive validity by using different scales of the Stanford Achievement Test for the Hearing Impaired. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1995, 13(3):241-249.
36. Kluwin T.N. Interpreting services for youngsters who are deaf in local public school programs. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association 1994, 28(2):21-29.
37. Kostrubala C.E., Braden J.P. Administration of the WAIS-III in American Sign Language 1998, [videotape], The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
38. Leutzinger M.R. Use of the WAIS-III performance scale with deaf adults. Dissertation Abstracts International 2002, 63(2):1036B.
39. Lichtenberger E.O., Kaufman A.S. Essentials of WPPSI-III assessment 2004, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
40. Liddell S.K. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Maller S.J. Deafness and WISC-III item difficulty: Invariance and fit. Journal of School Psychology 1997, 35(3):299-314.
42. Maller S.J. Best practices in detecting bias in nonverbal tests. Handbook of nonverbal assessment 2003, 23-62. Kluwer/Plenum, New York. R.S. McCallum (Ed.).
43. Maller S.J., Braden J.P. The construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC-III with deaf adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Monograph Series: WISC-III 1993, 104-113.
44. Maller S.J., Ferron J. WISC-III factor invariance across deaf and standardization samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1997, 57(6):987-994.
45. Handbook of nonverbal assessment 2003, Kluwer/Plenum, New York. R.S. McCallum (Ed.).
46. McCallum R.S., Bracken B.A., Wasserman J.D. Essentials of nonverbal assessment 2001, Wiley, New York.
47. McGrew K.S., Flanagan D.P. The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment 1998, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
48. Meng X., Gong Y. A comparative study on intelligence between deaf and hearing children. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology 1995, 3(3):137-139.
49. Meng X., Gong Y. A comparative study on intelligence between deaf and hearing children. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology 1995, 3(3):146.
50. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist 1995, 50(9):741-749.
51. Miller M.S. Experimental use of signed presentations of the Verbal Scale of the WISC-R with profoundly deaf children: A preliminary report of the sign selection process and experimental test procedures. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 082 1984.
52. Standards of care for the delivery of mental health services to deaf and hard of hearing people 1995, National Association of the Deaf, Silver Spring. R.R. Myers (Ed.).
53. NAD position statement on mental health services for people who are deaf and hard of hearing 2003, Available: http://www.nad.org/infocenter/newsroom/positions/mentalhealth.html, National Association of the DeafNational Association of the Deaf, Author, Silver Spring, MD.
54. National Center for Health and Statistics National interview survey 1994, (Series 10, No. 188), Author, Washington, DC.
55. Office of Civil Rights The use of tests as part of high-stakes decision-making for students: A resource guide for educators and policy makers 2000, Available: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OCR/archives/testing/index1.html., U.S. Department of Education (author), Washington, DC.
56. Phelps L., Ensor A. The comparison of performance by sex of deaf children on the WISC-R. Psychology in the Schools 1987, 24(3):209-214.
57. Phelps L., Ensor A. Gender differences on the WAIS-R Performance Scale with young deaf adults. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association 1989, 22(3):48-52.
58. Phillips S.E. Testing condition accommodations for disabled students. West's Education Law Quarterly 1993, 2(2):366-389.
59. Phillips S.E. Legal defensibility of standards: Issues and policy perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1996, 15(2):5-19.
60. Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf Membership Directory 2002 2002, Registry also available at http://www.rid.org, Author, Alexandria, VA.
61. Reschly D.J., Grimes J.P. Best practices in intellectual assessment. Best practices in school psychology 2002, 1337-1350. National Association of School Psychologists, Silver Spring, MD. 4th ed. A. Thomas, J.P. Grimes (Eds.).
62. Rush P. WAIS-R Verbal and Performance profiles of adolescents referred for atypical learning styles. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED313840 1989, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC. D.S. Martin (Ed.).
63. Saraev S.Y., Kozlov V.P. Age-related dynamics of mental functions in 7-to-12 year old deaf children (based on psychological data). Defektologiya 1991, 1:43-48.
64. Sattler J.M. Assessment of children 2002, Author, La Mesa, CA. 4th ed.
65. Sattler J.M., Hardy-Braz S.T. Hearing impairments. Assessment of children 2002, 377-389. Jerome M. Sattler, La Mesa, CA. 4th ed. J.M. Sattler (Ed.).
66. Schick B., Williams K., Bolster L. Skill levels of educational interpreters working in public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 1999, 4(2):144-155.
67. Slate J.R., Fawcett J. Validity of the WISC-III for deaf and hard of hearing persons. American Annals of the Deaf 1995, 140(3):250-254.
68. Slate J.R., Fawcett J. Gender differences in Wechsler Performance scores of school-age children who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf 1996, 141(1):19-23.
69. Spragins A.B., Blennerhasset L. Reviews of assessment instruments used with deaf and hard of hearing students 1998 update 1998, Available: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/~catraxle/reviews.html, Gallaudet Research Institute, Washington, DC.
70. Stewart D.A., Luetke-Stahlman B. The signing family: What every parent should know about sign communication 1998, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC.
71. Stewart J.H. Wechsler Performance IQ Scores and social behaviors of hearing-impaired students. Volta Review 1981, 83(4):215-222.
72. Sullivan P.M. Administration modifications on the WISC-R Performance Scale with different categories of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf 1982, 127:780-788.
73. Sullivan P.M., Montoya L.A. Factor analysis of the WISC-III with deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Psychological Assessment 1997, 9(3):312-317.
74. Sullivan P.M., Schulte L.E. Factor analysis of WISC-R with deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Psychological Assessment 1992, 4(4):537-540.
75. Thurlow M.L., Elliott J.L., Ysseldyke J.E. Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements 1998, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
76. United States Department of Education 24th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 2002, Available: http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2002/, Author, Washington, DC.
77. Vernon M., Andrews J.F. The psychology of deafness: Understanding deaf and hard-of-hearing people 1990, Longman, New York.
78. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 2003, 12-18. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX. 4th ed.
79. Wilhoit B.E., McCallum R.S. Cross-battery assessment of nonverbal cognitive ability. Handbook of nonverbal assessment 2003, 63-86. Kluwer/Plenum, New York. R.S. McCallum (Ed.).
80. Braden, J. P. & Athanasiou, M. S. (in press). A comparative review of nonverbal measures of intelligence. In D. P. Flangan and P. A. Harrison (Eds.) Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.