Legal defensibility of standards: Issues and policy perspectives

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 5-13

  Phillips, S E ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992799913     PISSN: 07311745     EISSN: 17453992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1996.tb00807.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen v. Alabama State Bd. of Educ., 612 E Supp. 1046 (M.D. Ala. 1985).
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Americans with Disabilities Act (A.D.A., 1990.) Pub. L. No. 101-336, 42 U.S.C. §§12101 et seq.
4. Anderson v. Banks. 540 E Sum. 472 (S.D. Fla. 1981), reh'g, 540 F. supp. 761 (S.D. Ga. 1982).
5. Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 US. 675, 106 S.Ct. 3159 (1986).
6. Board of Educ. of Northport-E. North-port v. Ambach, 436 N.Y.S.2d 564 (1981), aff'd 457 N.E.2d 775 (N.Y. 1983).
7. Board of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 102 S.Ct. 2799 (1982).
8. Brookhart v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 697 E2d 179 (7th Cir. 1983).
9. Clarizio, H. F, & Phillips, S. E. (1989). Defining severe discrepancy in the diamosis of learning disabilities: A compkison of methodus. Journal of School Psychology, 270, 383.
10. Debra P v. Turlington, 474 F Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 644 E2d 397 (5th Cir. 1981); on remand, 564 E Supp. 177 (M.D. Fla. 1983), aff'd, 730 E2d 1405 (11th Cir. 1984).
11. Desilets v. Clearview Regional Board of Education, - F Supp. - (1994).
12. Diegmueller, K. (1994). Draft standards for health, EE. are released. Education Week, 14 (7), 8.
13. Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 E Supp. 852 (E.D. Mich. 1989).
14. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 12328, 1974; 34 CXR. §§ 99 et seq. (1990).
15. Gamble, C. (1995). “Back to basics” slate in Littleton trounced by 2-to-1 margin. Education Week, 15(11), 12.
16. Garcia v. Miera, 817 E2d 650 (10th Cir. 1987), cert denied, 485 U.S. 959 (1988).
17. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).
18. Harp, L. (1993). Pennsylvania parent becomes mother of “outcomes” revolt. Education Week, 13(3), 1–19.
19. Hawaii State Dept. of Educ., 17 EHLR 360 (O.C.R. 1990).
20. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260, 108 S.Ct. 562 (1988).
21. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I.D.E.A., 1991) Pub. L. No. 102-119, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
22. In re D.B. 767 E2d 801 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
23. Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (1988). Code of fair testing Practices in education, Washington, DC: Author.
24. Kentucky Department of Education. (1995). KIRIS Biennium I technical manual. Frankfort, KY: Author.
25. Maxwell v. Pasadena I.S.D., No. 92 - 017184,295th District Court of Harris County, TX, Dec. 29, 1994.
26. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
27. Mississippi Department of Education. (1995). District guidelines for review of secure test materials. Jackson, MI: Author.
28. Olson, L. (1994). Fate of California testing unclear after Wilson's veto. Education Week, 14(10), 13.
29. Pandazides v. Virginia Bd. of Educ. E Supp. - (E. D. Va. 1992).
30. PASE. Hannon. 506 F. SUDD. 831 (N.D., III. 1980).
31. Personnel Administrator v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256, 99 S.Ct. 2282 (1979).
32. Phillips, S.E. (1990). The Golden Rule remedy for disparate impact of standardized testing: Progress or regress Education Law Reporter, 63, 383.
33. Phillips, S.E. (1991). Diploma sanction tests revisited: New problems from old solutions. Journal of Law and Education, 20(2), 175.
34. Phillips, S.E. (1993a) Legal issues in pedormance assessmeni. Education Law Reporter, 79, 709.
35. Phillips, S.E. (1993b) Testing accommodations or disabled students. Education Law Reporter, 80, 9.
36. Phillips, S.E. (1993c) Legal implications of high-stakes assessment: What states should know. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
37. Phillips, S.E. (1994). High-Stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93.
38. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
39. Pitsch, M. (1994). Critics target Goals 2000 in schools “war.” Education Week 14(7), 1.
40. Popham, J. (1991). Appropriateness of teachers' test-preparation practices. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 10(4), 12.
41. Schnaiberg, L. (October 5, 1994) Chicago flap shows limits of “inclusion,” critics say. Education Week, 14(5), 1.
42. Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 US. 397 (1979).
43. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 US. 503, 89 S.Ct. 733 (1969).
44. United States v. LULAC, 793 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1986).
45. United States v. South Carolina, 445 F Supp. 1094 (D.S.C. 19771), aff'd, 434 U.S. 1026 (1978).
46. US. Constitution, Amendments I, XIV section 1.
47. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Dev. Gorp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S.Ct. 555 (1977).
48. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio, 109 S.Ct. 2115 (1989).
49. Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
50. West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 US. 624, 63 Sect. 1178 (1943).
51. Wise v. Pea Ridge, 855 E2d 560 (8th Cir. 1988).
52. Woodard v. Los Fresnos Indep. Schl. Dist., 732 E2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1984).
53. Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills Schl. Dist., 113 S.Ct. 2462 (1993).