Relationships among objective measures and speech perception in adult users of the HiResolution bionic ear

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 70-81

  Wolfe, Jace ^a   Kasulis, Heather ^a  

^a Hearts for Hearing Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP); Electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSR1); Objective measures; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ACTION POTENTIAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REFLEX, ACOUSTIC; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55349119547     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cii.354     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abbas P, Brown C (1991) Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with Current level. Hearing Research 51: 123-138.
2. Brown C, Abbas P, Gantz B (1990) Electrically-evoked whole nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88: 1385-1391.
3. Brown C, Hughes M, Luk B, Abbas P, Wolaver A, Gervais J (2000) The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing 21: 151-163.
4. Buckler L, Dawson K, Overstreet E (2003) Relationship between Electrical Stapedial Reflex Thresholds and HiRes Program Settings: A Potential Tool for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Fitting. White Paper. Sylmar, CA: Advanced Bionics Corporation.
5. Eggermont JJ, Spoor A (1973) Cochlear adaptation in guinea pigs. Audiology 12: 193-220.
6. Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA (2004) Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear and Hearing 25: 375-387.
7. Franck KH, Norton SJ (2001) Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of the Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear and Hearing 22: 289-299.
8. Franck KH (2002) A model of a Nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential. Ear and Hearing 23: 61S-71S.
9. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV (2004) Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear and Hearing 25: 447-463.
10. Hodges A, Balkany T, Ruth R, Scholffinan J (1996) Equal loudness balancing using electrical middle ear muscle reflexes. Presented at the International Cochlear Implant Speech and Hearing Symposium, Melbourne, Australia.
11. Hodges AV, Balkany TJ, Ruth RA, Lambert PR, Dolan-Ash L, Scholffman, JJ (1997) Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117: 255-261.
12. Hodges AV, Butts, SL, King IE, Balkany TJ (2000) Electrically elicited stapedial reflex threshold in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Presented at CI2000, Sixth International Conference on Cochlear Implants, Miami, FL, USA.
13. Hughes M, Brown C, Abbas P, Wolaver A, Gervais J (2000) Comparison of EAP thresholds with map levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear and Hearing 21: 164-174.
14. Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D (2004) HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 9: 214-223.
15. Moog JS, Geers AE (2003) Epilogue: major findings, conclusions and implications for deaf education. Ear and Hearing 2: 121S-125S.
16. Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan J (1994) Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1085-1096.
17. Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Staller S, Arndt P, Cosgriff A, Ebinger K (2002) The Nucleus 24R Contour™ Cochlear Implant System: adult clinical trial results. Ear and Hearing 23: 41S-48S.
18. Peterson G, Lehiste I (1962) Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 27: 62-70.
19. Robbins AM, Koch DB, Osberger MI, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L (2004) Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery 130: 570-574.
20. Shallop J, Ash K (1996) relationships among comfort levels determined by cochlear implant patient's self programming, audiologist's programming, and electrical stapedius reflex thresholds. Annals of Otology- Rhinology, and Laryngology 166: 175-176.
21. Spivak LG, Chute PM (1994) The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels and children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear and Hearing 15: 184-192.
22. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK (1998) Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 102: 1161-1171.