Bone metabolic activity around dental implants under loading observed using bone scintigraphy

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 827-834

  Sasaki, Hiroto ^a   Koyama, Shigeto ^b   Yokoyama, Masayoshi ^a   Yamaguchi, Keiichiro ^a   Itoh, Masatoshi ^a   Sasaki, Keiichi ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone metabolism; Bone remodeling; Bone scintigraphy; Mechanical stress; Osseointegrated titanium implant

Indexed keywords

MEDRONATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE REGENERATION; IMPLANT; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SCINTISCANNING; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TECHNETIUM TC 99M MEDRONATE; TIBIA;

EID: 55349102670     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-334.
2. Isidor F. Mobility assessment with the Periotest system in relation to histologic findings of oral implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:377-383.
3. Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:1-9.
4. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:425-431.
5. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Favero L, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Favero GA. Clinical and histologic aspects of dental implants removed due to mobility. J Periodontol 2003;74:385-390.
6. Tonetti M, Schmid J. Pathogenesis of implants failures. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:127-138.
7. Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: Their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;8(suppl):146-155.
8. Sanz M, Alandex J, Lazaro P, Calvo JL, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Histopathologic characteristics of peri-implant soft tissues in Brånemark implants with 2 district clinical and radiological patterns. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:128-134.
9. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111.
10. Frost HM. Mechanical adaptation. Frost's mechanostat theory. In: Martin RB, Burr DB (eds). Structure, Function and Adaption of Compact Bone. New York: Raven Press, 1989:179-181.
11. Schenk RK, Buser D. Osseointegration: A reality. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:22-35.
12. Misch CE. Dental evaluation: Factors of stress. In Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, ed 2. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1999:122-123.
13. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977(suppl); 16:1-132.
14. Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85-97.
15. Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in rabbit: A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75.
16. Uhthoff H, Germain JB. Reversal of tissue differentiation around screws. Clin Orthopaedic Res 1977;123:248-252.
17. Roberts WE, Garetto LP, De Castro RA. Remodeling of devitalized bone threatens periosteal margin integrity of endosseous titanium implants with treated or smooth surfaces: Indications for provisional loading and axillary directed occlusion. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1989;68:19-24.
18. Khan O, Archibald A, Thomson E, Maharaj P. The role of quantitative single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) in the osseous integration process of dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:228-232.
19. Shigematsu M, Shomi S, Iwao H, Ochi H. New bone-seeking agent: Animal study of Tc-99m-incadronate. Ann Nucl Med 2002;16:55-59.
20. McCracken M, Zinn K, Lemons JE, Thompson JA, Feldman D. Radioimaging of implants in rats using Tc-99m-MDP. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:372-378.
21. Bambini F, Meme L, Procaccini M, Rossi B, Lo Muzio L. Bone scintigraphy and SPECT in the evaluation of the osseointegrative response to immediate prosthetic loading of endosseous implants: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:80-86.
22. Kanishi D. 99mTc-MDP accumulation mechanisms in bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:239-246.
23. Lysell L, Rohlin M. Initial Tc-99m diphosphonate uptake in mineralized and demineralized bone implants in rats. Int J Oral Surg 1985;14:371-375.
24. Schwartz Z, Shani J, Soskolne WA, Touma H, Amir D, Sela J. Uptake and biodistribution of technetium-99m-MD32P during rat tibial bone repair. J Nucl Med 1993;34:104-108.
25. Okamoto YM. Mechanism of accumulation of 99mTc-MDP to bone: Correlation of in vivo data with in vitro data. Radiat Med 1997:209-215.
26. Fogelman I. Skeletal uptake of diphosphonate: A review. Eur J Nucl Med 1980;5:473-476.
27. Hyldstrup L, Clemmensen I, Jensen BA, Transbol I. Non-invasive evaluation of bone formation: Measurements of serum alkaline phosphatase, whole body retention of diphosphonate and serum osteocalcin in metabolic bone disorders and thyroid disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1984;48:611-619.
28. Fleisch H. Bisphosphonates: Mechanisms of action. Endocr Rev 1998;19:80-100.
29. Chisin R, Gazit D, Ulmansky M, Laron A, Atlan H, Sela J. 99mTc-MDP uptake and histological changes during rat bone marrow regeneration. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B 1988;15:469-476.
30. Bijvoet OLM, Fleisch HA, Canfield RE, Russel RGG. Bisphosphonate on Bones. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1995:87-107.
31. Weber D, Ivanovic M, Franceschi D, et al. Pinhole SPECT: An approach to in vivo high resolution SPECT imaging in small laboratory animals. J Nucl Med 1994;35:342-348.
32. Masuda T, Salvi GE, Offenbacher S, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:472-485.
33. Medard C, Ribaux C, Chavrier C. A histological investigation on early tissue response to titanium implants in a rat intramedullary model. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:238-243.
34. Guglielmotti MB, Renou S, Cabrini RL. Evaluation of bone tissue on metallic implants by energy-dispersive x-ray analysis: An experimental study. Implant Dent 1999;8:303-309.
35. Kajiwara H, Yamaza T, Yoshinari M, et al. The bisphosphonate pamidronate on the surface of titanium stimulates bone formation around tibial implants in rats. Biomaterials 2005;26:581-587.
36. Clokie CM, Warshawsky H. Development of a rat tibia model for morphological studies of the interface between bone and a titanium implant. Compendium 1995;16:56-68.
37. Clokie CM, Warshawsky H. Morphologic and radioautographic studies of bone formation in relation to titanium implants using the rat tibia as a model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:155-165.
38. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1994;9:345-360.
39. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load. A study in the dog (I). Clin Oral Implant Res 2001;12:1-8.
40. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants with different surface characteristics subjected to static load. A study in the dog (II). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:196-201.
41. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:552-558.
42. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions at implants subjected to experimental peri-implantitis and static load. A study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:144-151.
43. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:144-152.
44. Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-188.
45. Saxon LK, Robling AG, Alam I, Turner CH. Mechanosensitivity of the rat skeleton decreases after a long period of loading, but is improved with time off. Bone 2005;36:454-464.
46. Warden SJ, Hurst JA, Sanders MS, Turner CH, Burr DB, Li J. Bone adaptation to a mechanical loading program significantly increases skeletal fatigue resistance. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:809-816.
47. Lanyon LE. Control of bone architecture by functional load bearing. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:369-375.
48. Lanyon LE. Functional strain in bone tissue as an objective, and controlling stimulus for adaptive bone remodeling. J Biomech 1987;20:1083-1093.
49. Cowin SC, Moss-Salentyin L. Candidates for mechanosensory system in bone. J Biomech Eng 1991;113:191-197.
50. Jones DB, Nolte H, Scholubbers JG, Turner E, Veltel D. Biochemical signal transduction of mechanical strain in osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 1991;12:101-110.
51. Verborgt O, Gibson GJ, Schaffler MB, Loss of osteocyte integrity in association with microdamage and bone remodeling after fatigue in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:60-67.
52. Noble BS, Peet N, Stevens HY, et al. Mechanical loading: Biphasic osteocyte survival and targeting of osteoclasts for bone destruction in rat cortical bone. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003;284:934-943.
53. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Motomura Y, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:677-683.