Comparison of two patient-based outcome measures for shoulder instability after nonoperative treatment

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 886-892

  Moser, Jane S ^a   Barker, Karen L ^a   Doll, Helen A ^b   Carr, Andrew J ^c  

^a OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECURRENT SHOULDER DISLOCATION; RESPONSE VARIABLE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER DISLOCATION; SHOULDER JOINT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55049123342     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.040     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Angst F., Aeschlimann A., and Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 45 (2001) 384-391
2. Beaton D., and Richards R.R. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7 (1998) 565-572
3. Beaton D.E. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 25 (2000) 3192-3199
4. Beaton D.E., Tarasuk V., Katz J.N., Wright J.G., and Bombardier C. "Are you better?" A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery. Arthritis Rheum 45 (2001) 270-279
5. Burkhead Jr. W.Z., and Rockwood Jr. C.A. Treatment of instability of the shoulder with an exercise program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 (1992) 890-896
6. Campbell M.J., Julious S.A., and Altman D.G. Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons. BMJ 311 (1995) 1145-1148
7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (1997), Academic Press, New York, NY
8. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., and Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 (1999) 420-426
9. Deyo R.A., and Centor R.M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39 (1986) 897-906
10. Edwards P., Roberts I., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Wentz R., et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires:systemic review. BMJ 324 (2002) 1183-1191
11. Fritz J.M., and Irrgang J.J. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 81 (2001) 776-788
12. Garratt A., Schmidt L., Mackintosh A., and Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 324 (2002) 1417-1421
13. Gibson K., Growse A., Korda L., Wray E., and MacDermid J.C. The effectiveness of rehabilitation for nonoperative management of shoulder instability: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 17 (2004) 229-242
14. Goldsmith C.H., Boers M., Bombardier C., and Tugwell P. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol 20 (1993) 561-565
15. Guyatt G., Walter S., and Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40 (1987) 171-178
16. Handoll H.H.G., Almaiyah M.A., and Rangan A. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for acute anterior shoulder dislocation. The Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews (2004)
17. Hanley J.A., and McNeil B.J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148 (1983) 839-843
18. Jaeschke R., Singer J., and Guyatt G.H. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10 (1989) 407-415
19. Kazis L.E., Anderson J.J., and Meenan M.D. Effect sizes for intepreting changes in health status. Medical Care 27 (1989) 178-189
20. Kirkley A., Griffin S., and Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19 (2003) 1109-1120
21. Kirkley A., Griffin S., Richards C., Miniaci A., and Mohtadi N. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 15 (1999) 507-514
22. L'Insalata J.C., Warren R.F., Cohen S.B., Altchek D.W., and Peterson M.G. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 738-748
23. Lewis A., Kitmura T., and Bayley J.I.L. The classification of shoulder instability: New light through old windows!. Curr Orthopaedics 18 (2004) 97-108
24. Liang M.H. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol 6 (1995) 1191-1192
25. Loughead J.M., and Williams J.R. Outcome following Bankhart repair for shoulder instability 1998-2002 using a subjective patient based shouder questionnaire (Oxford). Injury 36 (2005) 539-543
26. McHorney C.A., and Tarlov A.R. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Quality Life Res 4 (1995) 293-307
27. Michener L.A., and Leggin B.G. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Therapy 14 (2001) 68-76
28. Moseley Jr. J.B., Jobe F.W., Pink M., Perry J., and Tibone J. EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med 20 (1992) 128-134
29. Norman G.R. Issues in the use of change scores in randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 42 (1989) 1097-1105
30. Norman G.R., Stratford P., and Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 50 (1997) 869-879
31. Riddle D.L., Stratford P.W., and Binkley J.M. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2. Phys Ther 78 (1998) 1197-1207
32. Sahrmann S.A. Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes (2002), Mosby, St. Louis, MO
33. Stratford P.W., Binkley F.M., and Riddle D.L. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 76 (1996) 1109-1123
34. Stratford P.W., Binkley J., Solomon P., Finch E., Gill C., and Moreland J. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 76 (1996) 359-365
35. Stratford P.W., Binkley J.M., Riddle D.L., and Guyatt G.H. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther 78 (1998) 1186-1196
36. Stratford P.W., and Riddle D.L. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Quality Life Outcomes 3 (2005) 23-29
37. Streiner D.L., and Norman G.R. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use (1989), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
38. Takwale V.J., Calvert P., and Rattue H. Involuntary positional instability of the shoulder in adolescents and young adults. Is there any benefit from treatment?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 719-723
39. Watson L., Story I., Dalziel R., Hoy G., Shimmin A., and Woods D. A new clinical outcome measure of glenohumeral joint instability: the MISS questionnaire. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14 (2005) 22-30
40. Wells G., Beaton D., Shea B., Boers M., Simon L., Strand V., et al. Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol 28 (2001) 406-412
41. Whitley E., and Ball J. Statistics review 4: sample size calculations. Crit Care 6 (2002) 335-341
42. Wilk K.E., Meister K., and Andrews J.R. Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the overhead throwing athlete. Am J Sports Med 30 (2002) 136-151
43. Wright J., Cross J., and Lamb S. Physiotherapy outcome measures for rehabilitation of elderly people. Responsiveness to change of the Rivermead Mobility Index and Barthel Index. Physiotherapy 84 (1998) 216-221
44. Wyrwich K.W. Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: is there a connection?. J Biopharm Stat 14 (2004) 97-110