Post-operative health related quality of life assessment in scoliosis patients

Medical Journal of Malaysia

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 137-139

  Chan, Chris Yin Wei ^a   Kwan, M K ^b   Saw, L B ^b   Deepak, A S ^b   Chong, C S ^b   Liew, T M ^b   Lee, C S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTRE   (Malaysia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Quality of life; Scoliosis surgery; SRS 22

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CHINESE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INDIAN; MALAYSIA; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22 QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE SURGERY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 55049119967     PISSN: 03005283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Weinstein SL. Idiopathic scoliosis: natural history. Spine 1986; 11(8): 780-3.
2. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA, Marchetti PG, Ponte A, Savini R, et al. Natural history of untreated idiopathic scollosis after skeletal maturity. Spine 1986; 11(8): 784-9.
3. Liljenqvist UR, Halm HFH, Link TM. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22(19): 2239-45.
4. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 2004; 29(3): 333-42.
5. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31(3): 291-8.
6. King HA, Moe JH, David SB, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65-A(9): 1302-13.
7. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis: correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg (A) 1962; 44: 591-610.
8. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Kamath G, Peelle MW et al. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine 2006; 31(20): 2400-4.
9. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, Federico D, Oxland T et al. Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1991; 16(8): 888-901.
10. Scoles PV, Linton AE, Latimer B, Levy ME, Digiovanni BF. Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life. Spine 1988; 13(10): 1082-6.
11. Vaccaro, AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part 1: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77-A(8): 1193-9.
12. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Lubmann SJ, Bridwell KH. Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90°. Spine 2006; 31(20): 2386-91.
13. Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Schootman M. Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70° and 100°: is anterior release necessary? Spine 2005; 30(18): 2061-7.
14. Suk S, Lee CK, Kim W, Chung Y, Park Y. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 20: 1399-405.
15. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP et al. Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent isiopathic scolinsis. Spine 1999; 24(14): 1435-40.
16. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, Burtom DC. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24(16): 1693-700.
17. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000; 25(18): 2381-86.
18. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003; 28: 63-9.
19. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, Hu SS, Bradford DS et al. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discrimination capacity. Spine 2003; 28(18): 2164-9.
20. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton DC, Manna BJ. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003 Jan 1; 28(1): 74-7.
21. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, Manna BJ. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003; 28(1): 70-3.
22. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating srs-22 quality of life measures with sf-36. Application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31(4): 473-8.
23. Bago J, Climet J, Ey A et al. The spanish version of the srs-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004; 29: 1676-80.
24. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H et al. Reliability and validity of adapted turkish version of scoliosis research society-22 (srs-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30: 2464-8.
25. Crawford JR, Izatt MT, Adam CJ, Labrom RD, Askin GN. A prospective assessment of SRS-24 scores after endoscopic anterior instrumentation for scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31(21): E817-22.
26. Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, Pawelek J. Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 2005; 30(17): S100-9.
27. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine 2002; 27(2): 176-80.
28. Remes V, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Poussa M. Cotreldubousset or universal spine system instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of midterm clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes. Spine 2004; 29(18): 2024-30.
29. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, Panagopoulos G, Mathur S, Kohani O et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002; 27(18): 2046-51.