A prospective assessment of SRS-24 scores after endoscopic anterior instrumentation for scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 21, 2006, Pages

  Crawford, John R ^a   Izatt, Maree T ^a   Adam, Clayton J ^a   Labrom, Robert D ^a   Askin, Geoffrey N ^a  

^a MATER CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Endoscopic anterior instrumentation; Scoliosis; Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument; Spinal fusion; SRS 24

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BACKACHE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENDOSCOPIC ANTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION FOR SCOLIOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 24 SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 33749509060     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000239219.45703.d4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Picetti GD, Pang D, Bueff HU. Thoracoscopic techniques for the treatment of scoliosis: early results in procedure development. Neurosurgery 2002;51:978-84.
2. Newton PO, Marks M, Faro F, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to reduce perioperative morbidity in scoliosis surgery. Spine 2003;28:249-54.
3. Picetti GD, Ertl JP, Bueff HU. Endoscopic instrumentation, correction, and fusion of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2001;190-7.
4. Izatt M, Harvey J, Adam C, et al. Recovery in pulmonary function following endoscopic anterior scoliosis correction: evaluation at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. Spine In press.
5. Newton PO, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ, et al. Anterior release and fusion in paediatric spinal deformity: a comparison of early outcome and cost of thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approaches. Spine 1997;22:1398-406.
6. Newton PO, Shae KG, Granlund KF. Defining the paediatric spinal thoracoscopy learning curve: sixty-five consecutive cases. Spine 2000;25:1028-35.
7. Lenke LG. Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28(suppl 15):36-43.
8. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2000;25:1795-802.
9. Wilson PL, Newton PO, Wenger DR, et al. A multicenter study analysing the relationship of a standardised radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument. Spine 2002;27:2036-40.
10. Wong H, Hee H, Yu Z, et al. Results of thoracoscopic instrumented fusion versus conventional posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing selective thoracic fusion. Spine 2004;29:2031-8.
11. Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, et al. Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 2005;30:100-9.
12. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
13. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the scoliosis research society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-6.
14. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
15. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discrimination capacity. Spine 2003;28:2164-9.
16. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169-81.
17. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1956- 65.
18. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:2406-8.
19. Burton DC, Asher MA, Lai SM. Patient-based outcomes analysis of patients with single torsion thoracolumbar-lumbar scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:2363-7.
20. Remes V, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): comparison of midterm clinical, functional and radiological outcomes. Spine 2004;29:2024-30.
21. Lowe T, Betz R, Lenke L, et al. Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine 2003;28(suppl):208 -16.
22. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-73.
23. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-51.