Development of a sequential optimization procedure for robust design and tolerance design within a bi-objective paradigm

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 989-1009

  Shin, Sangmun ^a   Cho, Byung Rae ^b  

^a Inje University   (South Korea)

^b Clemson University   (United States)

Author keywords

Process optimization; Quality improvement; Robust design; Tolerance design; Weighted Tchebycheff method

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; FITS AND TOLERANCES; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; ROBUST DESIGN; TOLERANCE DESIGN; WEIGHTED TCHEBYCHEFF METHOD;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 54949126386     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150802148910     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Box, G.E.P., 1988. Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations. Technometrics, 30. 1-17.
2. Box, G.E.P., Bisgaard, S. and Fung, C., 1988. An explanation and critique of Taguchi's contributions to quality engineering. International Journal of Reliability Management, 4, 123-131.
3. Chen, W., Wiecek, M. and Zhang, J., 1999. Quality utility: a compromise programming approach to robust design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 121 (2), 179-187.
4. Cho, B.R., et al., 2000. An integrated joint optimization procedure for robust and tolerance design. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (10), 2309-2325.
5. Copeland, K.A.F. and Nelson, P.R., 1996. Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 28 (3), 331-336.
6. Del Castillo, E. and Montgomery, D.C., 1993. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology, 25 (3), 199-204.
7. Ding, R., Lin, D.K.J. and Wei, D., 2004. Dual-response surface optimization: a weighted MSE approach. Quality Engineering, 16 (3), 377-385.
8. Geoffrion, A.M., 1968. Proper efficiency and theory of vector maximization. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 22, 618-630.
9. Govindaluri, M.S. and Cho, B.R., 2007. Robust design modeling and optimization with correlated quality characteristics using a multicriteria decision framework. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32, 423-433.
10. Govindaluri, M.S., Shin, S. and Cho, B.R., 2004. Tolerance design using the Lambert W function: an empirical approach. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (16), 3235-3251.
11. Hong, S.H. and Cho, B.R., 2007. Joint optimization of process target mean and tolerance limits with measurement errors under multi-decision alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 183, 327-335.
12. Jayaram, J.S.R. and Ibrahim, Y., 1999. Multiple response robust design and yield maximization. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 6 (9), 826-837.
13. Khattree, R., 1996. Robust parameter design: aresponse surface approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 28 (2), 187-198.
14. Kim, Y.J. and Cho, B.R., 2000. Economic consideration on parameter design. Quality and Reliability Engineering Intel-national, 16, 501-514.
15. Kim, YJ. and Cho, B.R., 2002. Development of priority-based robust design. Quality Engineering, 14 (3), 355-363.
16. Kim, K.J. and Lin, D.K., 1998. Dual response surface optimization: a fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 30 (1), 1-10.
17. Koksoy, O. and Doganaksoy, N., 2003. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation using response surface methods. Journal of Quality Technology, 35 (3), 239-252.
18. Kovach, J., Cho, B.R. and Antony, J., 2008. Development of an experiment based robust design paradigm for multiple quality characteristics using physical programming. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35, 1100-1112.
19. Leon, R.V., Shoemaker, A.C. and Kackar, R.N., 1987. Performance measures independent of adjustment: an explanation and extension of Taguchi signal-to-noise ratio. Technometrics, 29, 253-285.
20. Lewis, K., Chen, W. and Schmidt, L., 2006. Decision making in engineering design. New York: ASME Press.
21. Lin, D.KJ. and Tu, W., 1995. Dual response surface optimization: a fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 27, 34-39.
22. Mattson, C.A. and Messac, A., 2003. Concept selection using s-Pareto frontiers. AIAA Journal, 41 (6), 1190-1198.
23. Memtsas, D.P., 2003. Multiobjective programming methods in the reserve selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 640-652.
24. Messac, A. et al., 2000. The ability of objective functions to generate points on non-convex Pareto frontiers. AIAA Journal, 38, 1084-1090.
25. Michael, W. and Siddall, J.N., 1981. The optimization problem with optimal tolerance assignment with full acceptance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 103, 842-848.
26. Michael, W. and Siddall, J.N., 1982. The optimal tolerance assignment with less than full acceptance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 104, 855-860.
27. Miro-Quesada, G. and Del Castillo, E., 2004. Two approaches for improving the dual response method in robust parameter design. Journal of Quality Technology, 36 (2), 154-168.
28. Nair, V.N., 1992. Taguchi's parameter design: a panel discussion. Technometrics, 34 (2), 127-161.
29. Phillips. M.D., Madduri, K.S. and Cho, B.R., 1995. Enhanced optimization strategies for robust design. In: Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings, Miami Beach, FL, CD-ROM.
30. Shin, S.M. and Cho, B.R., 2005. Bias-specified robust design optimization and an analytical solution. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48, 129-148.
31. Shin, S.M. and Cho, B.R., 2006. Robust design models for customer-specified bounds on process parameters. Journal of Systems Science & Systems Engineering, 15 (1), 2-18.
32. Shin, S.M. and Cho, B.R., 2007. Integrating a bi-objective paradigm to tolerance optimization. International Journal of Production Research. Special Issue on Advanced Quality Engineering, 23 (1), 5509-5525.
33. Shin, S.M., Govindaluri, M.S. and Cho, B.R., 2004. Integrating the Lambert W function to a tolerance optimization problem. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21 (8), 795-808.
34. Steuer, R.E., 1986. Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Taguchi, G. 1986. Introduction to quality engineering. New York: UNIPUB.
36. Taguchi, G. 1993. Taguchi on robust technology development. New York: ASME Press.
37. Tang, L.C. and Xu, K., 2002. A unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 34 (4), 437-447.
38. Tind, J. and Wiecek. M.M., 1999. Augmented Lagrangian and Tchebycheff approaches in multiple objective programming. Journal of Global Optimization, 14, 251-266.
39. Tsui, K.L., 1992. An overview of Taguchi method and newly developed statistical methods for robust design. IIE Transactions, 24 (5). 44-57.
40. Vining, G.G. and Myers, R.H., 1990. Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: a dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 38-45.
41. Yue, R.X., 2002. Model-robust designs in multiresponse situations. Statistics & Probability Letters. 58, 369-379.