Robust design modeling with correlated quality characteristics using a multicriteria decision framework

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 5-6, 2007, Pages 423-433

  Govindaluri, Srikrishna Madhumohan ^a   Cho, Byung Rae ^b  

^a RAMAPO COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b AMRL   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlated multiple quality characteristics; Entropy method; Multi attribute weight assessment; Multi objective; Pareto solutions; Robust design optimization

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL;

CORRELATED MULTIPLE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; ENTROPY METHOD; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE WEIGHT ASSESSMENTS; PARETO SOLUTIONS; ROBUST DESIGN OPTIMIZATION;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33847752190     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0349-6     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering. Krauss International, White Plains, New York
2. Kapur KC, Cho BR (1996) Economic design of the specification region for multiple quality characteristics. HE Trans 28(3):237-248
3. Cho BR, Kim YJ, Kimbler DL, Phillips MD (2000) An integrated joint optimization procedure for robust and tolerance design. Int J Prod Res 38(10):2309-2325
4. Kim YJ, Cho BR (2000) Economic considerations on parameter design. Qual Reliab Eng Int 16(6):501-514
5. Cho BR, Govindaluri MS (2002) Optimal screening limits in multi-stage assemblies. Int J Prod Res 40(9):1993-2009
6. Wu F-C, Chyu C-C (2004) Optimization of robust design for multiple quality characteristics. Int J Prod Res 42(2):337-354
7. Chen W, Allen JK, Tsui K-L, Mistree F (1996) A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mech Des - Trans ASME 118(4):478-485
8. Chen W, Wiecek MM, Zhang J (1999) Quality utility - a compromise programming approach to robust design. J Mech Des - Trans ASME 121(2):179-187
9. Fogliatto FS, Albin SL (2001) A hierarchical method for evaluating products with quantitative and sensory characteristics. IIE Trans 33(12):1081-1092
10. Kim YJ, Cho BR (2002) Development of priority-based robust design. Qual Eng 14(3):355-363
11. Dai Z, Scott MJ, Mourelatos ZP (2003) Robust design using preference aggregation methods. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (DETC 2003), Chicago, Illinois, September 2003, ASME paper no DETC2003/DAC-48715
12. Lin DKJ, Tu W (1995) Dual response surface optimization. J Qual Technol 27(1):34-39
13. Pignatiello EC Jr (1993) Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. HE Trans 25(3):5-15
14. Suhr R, Batson RG (2000) Constrained multivariate loss function minimization. Qual Eng 13(3):475-484
15. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Chu ATW, Kalaba RE, Springarn KA (1979) Comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J Optim Theory Appl 27(4):531-538
17. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois
18. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the art survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
19. Sopadang A, Kim YJ, Clio BR (2001) A method for assessing weight of multiple quality attributes. Quality Control and Reliability Engineering Newsletter, pp 1-6
20. Sopadang A, Cho BR, Leonard. MS (2003) Development of the hybrid weight assessment system for multiple quality attributes. Qual Eng 15(1):75-89
21. Wasserman GS (1993) On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. HE Trans 25(3):59-65
22. Vining GG, Myers RH (1990) Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: a dual response approach. J Qual Technol 22(1):38-45
23. Chiao C-H, Hamada MS (2000) Analyzing experiments with correlated multiple responses. J Qual Technol 33(4):451-465
24. Welch WJ, Yu TK, Kang SM, Sacks J (1990) Computer experiments for quality control by parameter design. J Qual Technol 22(1):15-22
25. Sen P, Yang B-J (1998) Multiple criteria decision support in engineering design. Springer, London