Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process: The pursuit of 'quality' in pre-sentence reports

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 835-855

  Tata, Cyrus ^a   Burns, Nicola ^b   Halliday, Simon ^a,c   Hutton, Neil ^a   McNeill, Fergus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949126059     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: 14643529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azn055     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ABBOTT, A. (1988), The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. ALLEN, R. and HOUGH, M. (2007), 'Community Penalties, Sentencers, the Media and Public Opinion', in L. Gelsthorpe and R. Morgan, eds, Handbook of Probation, 565-90. Cullompton: Willan.
3. ASHWORTH, A. (2005), Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. BATEMAN, T. and STANLEY, C. (2003), Patterns of Sentencing: Differential Sentencing across England and Wales, London: Youth Justice Board.
5. BONTA, J., BOURGON, G., JESSEMAN, R. and YESSINE, A. (2005), Pre-Sentence Reports in Canada 2005-03, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
6. BOTTOMS, A. and MCCLEAN, J. (1976), Defendants in the Criminal Process. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
7. BOTTOMS, A. and MCWILLIAMS, B. (1986), 'Social Enquiry Reports Twenty-Five Years after the Streatfield Report', in P. Bean and D. Whynes, eds, Barbara Wootton, Social Science and Public Policy: Essays in her Honour, 245-76. London: Routledge
8. BROWN, L. and LEVY, L. (1998), Social Work and Criminal Justice: Volume 4 - Sentencer Decision Making. Edinburgh: TSO.
9. BROWN, S. (1991), Magistrates at Work. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
10. BURNEY, E. (1979), Magistrate, Court and Community. London: Heinemann.
11. CARTER, R. and WILKINS, L. (1967), 'Some Factors in Sentencing Policy', Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58: 503-14.
12. CAVADINO, M. (1997), 'Pre-Sentence Reports: The Effects of Legislation and National Standards', British Journal of Criminology, 37: 529-48.
13. CREAMER, A. (2000), 'Reporting to the Scottish Courts: The Quality of Social Enquiry Reports and Custody', International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 28: 1-13.
14. CURRAN, J. and CHAMBERS, G. (1982), Social Enquiry Reports in Scotland. Edinburgh: Central Research Unit, Scottish Office, HMSO.
15. DOWNING, K. and LYNCH, R. (1997), 'Pre-Sentence Reports: Does Quality Matter?', Social Policy and Administration, 31: 173-90.
16. FIELD, S. (2006), 'Practice Cultures and the "New" Youth Justice in (England and) Wales', British Journal of Criminology, 47: 311-30.
17. GELSTHORPE, L. and RAYNOR, P. (1995), 'Quality and Effectiveness in Probation Officers' Reports to Sentencers', British Journal of Criminology, 35: 188-200.
18. HAINES, K. and MORGAN, R. (2007), 'Services before trial and Sentence: Achievement, Decline and Potential' in L. Gelsthrope and R. Morgan, eds, Handbook of Probation. Cullompton: Willan.
19. HALLIDAY, S., BURNS, N., HUTTON, N., MCNEILL, F. and TATA, C. (2008), 'Shadow-Writing and Participant Observation: A Study of Criminal Justice Social Work around Sentencing', Journal of Law & Society, 35: 189-213.
20. HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. (2005), 'Criminogenic Needs and the Transformative Risk Subject', Punishment and Society, 7: 29-51.
21. HINE, J., MCWILLIAMS, W. and PEASE, K. (1978), 'Recommendations, Social Information and Sentencing ', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 17: 91-100.
22. HORSLEY, G. (1984), The Language of Social Enquiry Reports, Social Work Monograph 27, Norwich: University of East Anglia in association with Social Work Today.
23. HUDSON, B. and BRAMHALL, G. (2005), 'Assessing the "Other": Constructions of "Asianness" in Risk Assessments by Probation Officers', British Journal of Criminology, 45: 721-40.
24. HUTTON, N. (2006), 'Sentencing as a Social Practice', in S. Armstrong and L. McAra, eds, Perspectives on Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. KEMSHALL, H. and MAGUIRE, M. (2001), 'Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality', Punishment & Society, 3: 237-64.
26. MATHER, L., MCEWEN, C. and MAIMAN, R. (2001), Divorce Lawyers at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. MAURUTTO, P. and HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. (2006), 'Assembling Risk and the Restructuring of Penal Control', British Journal of Criminology, 46: 438-54.
28. MCCONVILLE, M., HODGSON, J., BRIDGES, L. and PAVLOVIC, A. (1994), Standing Accused. Oxford: Clarendon Press ; New York: Oxford University Press.
29. MCNEILL, F. and BURNS, N. (2005), 'Redemption and Risk: Social Enquiry and the New Penology', Glasgow School of Social Work seminar series audio recording, available online at www.sieswe.org/node/130.
30. MCNEILL, F. and WHYTE, B. (2007), Reducing Reoffending: social work and community justice in Scotland. Cullompton: Willan
31. MCNEILL, F., BURNS, N., HALLIDAY, S., HUTTON, N. and TATA, C. (2008), 'Hysteresis, Risk and Reconfiguration', paper presented to the European Society of Criminology.
32. MORGAN, R. (2003), 'Thinking about the Demand for Probation Services', Probation Journal: The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice, 50: 7-19.
33. MORGAN, R. and HAINES, K. (2007), 'Services before Trial and Sentence', in L. Gelsthorpe and R. Morgan, eds, Handbook of Probation. 182-209. Cullompton: Willan.
34. MOTT, J. (1977), 'Decision Making and Social Inquiry Reports in One Juvenile Court', British Journal of Social Work, 14: 361-78.
35. NACRO. (2005), Youth Crime Briefing: Pre-Sentence Reports and the Use of Custody. London: Nacro.
36. NELLIS, M. (1995), 'Probation Values for the 1990s', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 34: 19-44.
37. PARKER, H., SUMNER, M. and JARVIS, G. (1989), Unmasking the Magistrates: The Custody or Not Decision in Sentencing Young Offenders. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
38. PATERSON, A. (1983), 'Becoming a Judge', in R. Dingwall and P. Lewis, eds, The Sociology of the Professions, 286-306. London: Macmillan.
39. PERRY, F. (1974), Information for the Court: A New Look at Social Inquiry Reports, Cropwood Occasional Paper 13, Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.
40. PHOENIX, J. (2006), Doing Justice: Analysing Risk and Need: Assessments in Youth Justice Practice, report to the ESRC.
41. RAWSON, S. (1982), Sentencing Theory, Social Enquiry and Probation Practice, Social Work Monographs 6, Norwich: University of East Anglia in association with Social Work Today.
42. ROACH ANLEU, S. and MACK, K. (2001), 'Pleading Guilty and Professional Relations in Australia', Justice System Journal, 22: 155-84.
43. ROBINSON, G. (2002), 'Exploring Risk Management in Probation Practice', Punishment and Society, 4: 5-25.
44. ROBINSON, G. and MCNEILL, F. (2004), 'Purposes Matter: The Ends of Probation', in G. Mair, eds, What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan.
45. ROSENCRANCE, J. (1988), 'Maintaining the Myth of Individualized Justice: Probation Presentence Reports', Justice Quarterly, 5: 235-56.
46. SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE(2000), National Standards for Social Enquiry and Related Reports and Court Based Social Work Services. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
47. _ (2004), National Objectives for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System: Standards -Social Enquiry Reports and Associated Courts Services. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
48. _ (2006), Criminal Justice Social Work Statistics, 2004-05, Statistical Bulletin, Criminal Justice Series, CrJ/2006/01. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
49. _ (2007), Criminal Justice Social Work Statistics, 2004-05, Statistical Bulletin, Criminal Justice Series, CrJ/2007/01. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
50. SCOTTISH OFFICE(1998), Community Sentencing: The Tough Option: Review of Criminal Justice Social Work Services, Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
51. SMART, C. (1984), The Ties that Bind. London: Routledge.
52. SOCIAL WORK INSPECTION AGENCY (SWIA) (2004), Performance Inspection of Criminal Justice Social Work Services: Report on Glasgow Council Criminal Justice Social Work Services 2004.
53. SOCIAL WORK SERVICES GROUP (1991), National Objectives and Standards for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System
54. SOCIAL WORK SERVICES INSPECTORATE (SWSI) (1996), Helping the Court Decide: Report of an Inspection of Social Enquiry Reports for the Criminal Courts. HMSO.
55. SWAIN, P. (2005), ''No Expert Should Cavil at any Questioning': Reports and Assessments for Courts and Tribunals' Australian Social Work 58: 44-57
56. TATA, C. (2008), 'The Role of Pre-Sentence Reports in the Production (and Disruption) of Guilt and Guilty Pleas', paper presented to the European Society of Criminology Annual Conference.
57. _ (2007a), 'In the Interests of Clients or Commerce? Legal Aid, Supply, Demand, and Ethical Indeterminacy in Criminal Defence Work', Journal of Law & Society, 34: 489-519.
58. _ (2007b), 'Sentencing as Craftwork', Social & Legal Studies, 16: 425-47.
59. TATA, C. and HUTTON, N. (2003), 'Beyond the Technology of Quick Fixes', Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16: 67-75.
60. THORPE, J. (1979), Social Inquiry Reports: A Survey, Home Office Research Unit Report. London: HMSO.
61. THORPE, J. and PEASE, K. (1976), 'The Relationship between Recommendations Made to the Court and Sentences Passed', British Journal of Criminology, 16: 393-4.
62. WHYTE, W., RAMSAY, J., CLARK, C. and WATERHOUSE, L. (1995), Social Work in the Criminal Justice System in Scotland: Competencies Required by the National Objectives and Standards for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
63. WILLIAMS, B. and CREAMER, A. (1989), Social Enquiry within a Changing Sentencing Context. Central Research Unit, Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
64. YOUTH JUSTICE BOARD FOR ENGLAND AND WALES (2007), Managing the Demand for Custody: Guidance to Practitioners, available online at www.yjb.gov.uk.