Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 438-454

  Maurutto, Paula ^a   Hannah Moffat, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745449774     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: 14643529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azi073     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ANDREWS, D. A. (1982), The Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI): 1. The First Follow-up. Ottawa: Ministry of Correctional Services.
2. _(1991), 'Recidivism Is Predictable and Can Be Influenced: Using Risk Assessments to Reduce Recidivism', Practitioner's Forum, 2/3: 8-14.
3. ANDREWS, D. and BONTA, J. (1989/1994) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Andersen Publishing.
4. ANDREWS, D. A. and BONTA, J. (1998), The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Ohio: Anderson Publishing.
5. BAIRD, S. C., HEINZ, R. C. and BEHMUS, B. J. (1979), Project report 14: A two-year follow up. Wisconsin: Department of Health and Social Services, Case Classification/Staff Deployment Project, Community Corrections.
6. BAKER, T. and SIMON, J. (2002), Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. BECK, U. (1997), World Risk Society. London: Polity Press.
8. BONTA, J. (1996), 'Risk/Needs Assessment and Treatment', in T. Harland, ed., Choosing Correctional Options that Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
9. BURGESS, E. W. (1928), 'Factors Determining Success or Failure on Parole', in A. Bruce, A. Harno, E. Burgess and J. Landesco, eds, The Workings of Intermediate-Sentence Law and the Parole System in Illinois. Springfield, IL: State Board Of Parole.
10. COPAS, J., MARSHALL, P. and TARLING, R. (1996), Predicting Reoffending for Discretionary Conditional Release, Home Office Research Study 150. London: HMSO.
11. DAL PRA, Z. (2004), 'In Search of a Risk Instrument', in M. Thigpen and G. Keiser, eds, Topics in Community Corrections: Issues for Managers. Washington: National Institute of Corrections.
12. DOUGLAS, M. (1992), Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
13. ERICSON, R. V. and DOYLE, A. (2003), Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
14. EWALD, F. (1991), 'Insurance and Risk', in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller, eds, The Foucault Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. FEELEY, M. and SIMON, J. (1992), 'New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications', Criminology 30/4: 449-74.
16. _(1994), 'Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law', in D. Nelken, ed., The Futures Of Criminology. London: Sage. pp.173-201.
17. FERGUSON, J. (2002), 'Putting the What Works Research into Practice: An Organizational Perspective', Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 29/4: 472-92.
18. GARLAND, D. (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
19. _(2003), 'The Rise of Risk', in R. Ericson and A. Doyle, eds, Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
20. GLASNER, D. (1985), 'Who Gets Probation and Parole: Case Study versus Actuarial Decision Making', Crime and Delinquency, 31: 367-78.
21. HACKING, I. (1990), The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. _(2005), 'Criminogenic Needs and the Transformative Risk Subject: Hybridizations of Risk/Need in Penality', Punishment and Society, 7/1: 29-51.
23. HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. and MAURUTTO, P. (2004), Youth Risk/Need Assessment: An Overview of Issues and Practices.Ottawa: Research and Statistics Division, Department of Justice Canada.
24. HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. and SHAW, M. (2001), Taking Risks Incorporating Gender and Culture into Classification and Assessment of Federally Sentenced Women. Ottawa: Status Of Women Canada.
25. HART, H. (1923), 'Predicting Parole Success', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 14: 405-13.
26. HOFFMAN, P. B. (1983), 'Screening for Risk: A Revised Salient Factor Score', Journal of Criminal Justice, 11:539-47.
27. HUDSON, B. (2001), 'Punishment, Rights and Difference: Defending Justice in the Risk Society', in K. Stenson and R. Sullivan, eds, Crime, Risk and Justice: The Politics of Crime Control in Liberal Democracies. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
28. _(2003), Justice in the Risk Society. London: Sage Publications.
29. Kemshall, H. (1998), Risk in Probation Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
30. _(2002), Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
31. _(2003), Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
32. KEMSHALL, H. and MAGUIRE, M. (2001), 'Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality: The Multi-Agency Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders', Punishment and Society, 3/2: 237-64.
33. KEMSHALL, H., PARTON. N., WALSH, M. and WATERSON, J. (1997), 'Concepts of Risk in Relation to Organizational Structure and Functioning within the Personal Social Services and Probation', Social Policy and Administration, 31/3: 213-32.
34. LATOUR, B. (1987), Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. LEACOCK, V. and SPARKS, R. (2002), 'Riskiness and At-Risk-Ness: Some Ambiguous Features of the Current Penal Landscape', in N. Gray, J. Laing and L. Noaks, eds, Criminal Justice, Mental Health and the Politics of Risk. London: Cavendish Publishing.
36. LOWENKAMP, C., LATESSA, E. and HOLSINGER, A. (2004), 'Empirical Evidence on the Importance of Training and Experience in Using the Level of Service Inventory - Revised', Topics in Community Corrections. Colorado: National Institute of Corrections-US Department of Justice.
37. LOZA, W. and SIMOURD, D. (1994), 'Paychometric evaluation of the level of supervision inventory (LSI) among male Canadian federal offenders', Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 21/4: 468-80.
38. LYNCH, M. (1998), 'Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting and the Parole Agent Identity', Law and Society Review, 32/4: 839-69.
39. MEGARGEE, E. I. and BOHN, M. J. (1979), Classifying Criminal Offenders: A New System Based on the MMPI. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40. MILLER, L. (2001), 'Looking for Postmodernism in all the Wrong Places: Implementing a New Penology', British Journal of Criminology, 41: 168-84.
41. MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES (MSGCS) (1995), Level Of Service Inventory - or - Fact's Behind Risk Assessment. Ontario: Ministry of the Solicitor General and Correctional Services.
42. NUFFIELD, J. (1982), Parole Decision-Making in Canada. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.
43. O'MALLEY, P. (2000), 'Risk Societies and the Government of Crime', in M. Brown and J. Pratt, eds, Dangerousness, Risk and Modern Society. London: Routledge.
44. _(2001), 'Risk, Crime and Prudentialism Revisited', in K Stenson and R. Sullivan, eds, Crime, Risk and Justice: The Politics of Crime Control in Liberal Democracies. London: Willan.
45. _(2002), 'Globalizing Risk? Distinguishing Styles of 'Neo-Liberal' Criminal Justice in Australia and the USA', Criminal Justice, 2/2: 205-22.
46. _(2004), Risk, Uncertainty, Government. London: The Glasshouse Press.
47. ROBINSON, G. (1999), 'Risk management and rehabilitation in the probation service: Collision and collusion', The Howard Journal, 38/4: 421-33.
48. ROBINSON, G. (2001), 'Power, knowledge and "what works" in probation', The Howard Journal, 40/3:235-54.
49. _(2002), 'A Rationality of Risk in the Probation Service: Its Evolution and Contemporary Profile', Punishment and Society, 14/1: 5-25.
50. ROSANVALLON, P. (2000), The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. ROSE, N. (1998), 'Governing Risky Individuals: The Role of Psychiatry in New Regimes of Control', Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5/2: 177-95.
52. SERIN, R. and MAILLOUX, D. (2001), Development Of A Reliable Self-Report. Instrument For The Assessment Of Criminogenic Need. Ottawa: Research Branch of the Correctional Service of Canada.
53. SIMON. J. (1995), 'They Died with their Boots On: The Boot Camp and the Limits of Modern Penality', Social Justice, 22/2: 25-48.
54. _ (1996), 'Criminology and the Recidivist', in D. Schichor and D. Schrest, eds, Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy. London: Sage.
55. SPARKS, R. (2000), 'Perspectives on Risk and Penal Polities', in T. Hope and R. Sparks, eds, Crime, Risk and Insecurity. London: Routledge.
56. STENSON, K. and SULLIVAN, R. (2001), Crime, Risk and Justice: The Politics of Crime Control in Liberal Democracies. London: Willan.
57. VALVERDE, M. and MOPAS, M. (2004), 'Insecurity and the Dream of Targeted Governance', in W. Larner and W. Walters, eds, Global Governmentality. London: Routledge.
58. VAN VOORHIS, P. (1997), 'Correctional Classification and the 'Responsivity Principle', Forum, 9/1.
59. WORMITH, S. (1997), 'Research into Practice: Applying Risk/Needs Assessment to Offender Classification', Forum on Corrections Research, 9/1.