Gender perspectives in European research

Pharmacological Research

Volumn 58, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 183-189

  Klinge, Ineke ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Basic and clinical research; EU gender equality policy; Gender effects; Gender sensitive research; Practical tools; Research methodology; Sex differences

Indexed keywords

ASTHMA; BASIC RESEARCH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DISEASE MODEL; DRUG INDUSTRY; EUROPE; FUNDING; GENDER; LIFESTYLE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; METHODOLOGY; NUTRIGENOMICS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RESEARCH; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 54849434814     PISSN: 10436618     EISSN: 10961186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.07.011     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Klinge I., and Bosch M. Transforming research methodologies in EU life sciences and biomedicine: gender-sensitive ways of doing research. Eur J Women's Stud 12 (2005) 377
2. Klinge I, Bosch M. Gender in research. Gender impact assessment of the specific programmes of the fifth Framework Programme. Quality of life and management of living resources (EUR 20017). Brussels: European Commission; 2001.
3. European Commission. Vademecum: gender mainstreaming in the 6th framework programme - reference guide for scientific officers/project officers. Brussels: European Commission; 2003.
4. European Commission. Gender action plan in integrated projects and networks of excellence. Compendium of best practices. Brussels: Research Directorate-Generale; 2004.
5. Roth C. Monitoring adherence to the NIH policy on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. NIH. Comprehensive report (fiscal year 1997 and 1998 tracking data). September 2000.
6. Vidaver R.M., Lafleur B., Tong C., Bradshaw R., and Marts S.A. Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. J Women's Health Gender-based Med 9 (2000) 495-504
7. Wizemann T.M., and Pardue M.L. Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? Executive summary of the institute of medicine report. J Women's Health Gender-based Med 10 (2001) 433-439
8. The Society for Women's Health Research. Institute of medicine report validates the science of sex differences. J Women's Health Gender-based Med 10 (2001) 303-304
9. Greenberger P. Second SAGE conference explores the molecular and cellular basis of sex differences. J Women's Health Gender-based Med 10 (2001) 511-513
10. Greaves L, Hankivsky O, Amaratunga C, Ballem P, Chow D, De Koninck M, et al. CIHR 2000. Sex, gender and women's health. Vancouver, British Columbia: Centre of Excellence for Women's Health, British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre; 1999.
11. Health Canada. Health Canada's gender-based analysis policy. Women's Health Bureau; 2000.
12. Prins M.H., Smits K.M., and Smits L.J. Methodologic ramifications of paying attention to sex and gender differences in clinical research. Gender Med 4 (2007) S106-S110
13. Ostlin P. Presentation at GenderBasic expert meeting, 26-27 January 2007.
14. Sen G., George A., and Östlin P. Engendering health equity: a review of research and policy. In: Sen G., George A., and Östlin P. (Eds). Engendering international health: the challenge of equity (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge
15. Lorber J. Sex matters and gender matters. Br Med J (2001)
16. Hammarström A. A tool for developing gender research in medicine: examples from the medical literature on work life. Gender Med 4 (2007) S123-S132
17. Phillips S. Gender in clinical research. review of Prins et al. Presentation at GenderBasic expert meeting, 26-27 January 2007.
18. Postma D.S. Gender differences in asthma development and progression. Gender Med 4 (2007) S133-S146
19. Holdcroft A. Integrating the dimensions of sex and gender into basic life sciences research: methodologic and ethical issues. Gender Med 4 (2007) S64-S74
20. GenderBasic: Promoting Integration of Sex and Gender Aspects in Biomedical and Health-Related Research. Gender Med 2007;4:S59-193.
21. Bekker M.H.J., and van Mens-Verhulst J. Anxiety disorders: sex differences in prevalence, degree, and background. but gender-neutral treatment. Gender Med 4 (2007) S178-S193
22. DunnGalvin A., Hourihane J.O., Frewer L., Knibb R.C., Oude Elberink J.N., and Klinge I. Incorporating a gender dimension in food allergy research: a review. Allergy 61 (2006) 1336-1343
23. Geusens P., and Dinant G. Integrating a gender dimension into osteoporosis and fracture risk research. Gender Med 4 (2007) S147-S161
24. White A. Review of integrating a gender dimension in osteoporosis and fracture research by Geusens and Dinant. Presentation at GenderBasic expert meeting, 26-27 January 2007.
25. Regitz-Zagrosek V., Lehmkuhl E., and Mahmoodzadeh S. Gender aspects of the role of the metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Gender Med 4 (2007) S162-S177
26. Ordovas J.M. Gender, a significant factor in the cross talk between genes, environment, and health. Gender Med 4 (2007) S111-S122
27. Franconi F. The invisible woman. Presentation at GenderBasic expert meeting, 26-27 January 2007.
28. Franconi F., Brunelleschi S., Steardo L., and Cuomo V. Gender differences in drug responses. Pharmacol Res 55 (2007) 81-95
29. Franconi F., Seghieri G., Canu S., Straface E., Campesi I., and Malorni W. Are the available experimental models of type 2 diabetes appropriate for a gender perspective?. Pharmacological Res 57 (2008) 6-18
30. Schulz A., and Mullings L. Gender, race, class and health: intersectional approaches (2005), Wiley & Sons, Toronto, ON
31. Wieringa N., Reijneveld M., and Stronks K. Diversity from an epidemiological perspective: looking for underlying causes and changing merits. In: Wieringa N.F., Hardon A.F., Stronks K., and M'charek A.A. (Eds). Diversity among patients in medical practice: challenges and implications for clinical research (2005), Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam 13-46
32. Wely M., Stolk P., Bossuyt P., Offringa M., Grobbee R., and Stronks K. Methodological implications of focussing on diversity in clinical research. In: Wieringa N.F., Hardon A.F., Stronks K., and M'charek A.A. (Eds). Diversity among patients in medical practice: challenges and implications for clinical research (2005), Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam 129-158
33. GenderBasic. Final Report. Published on www.GenderBasic.nl; 2008.
34. Klinge I. Bringing gender expertise to biomedical and health-related research. Gender Med 4 (2007) S59-S63. http://www.genderbasic.nl/ www.GenderBasic.nl
35. Birke L. Feminism and the biological body (1999), Edinburgh University Press
36. Fausto-Sterling A. The problem with sex/gender and nature/nurture. In: Williams S.J., Birke L., and Bendelow C.A. (Eds). Debating biology: sociological reflections on medicine, health and society (2003), Routledge, London 123-132
37. Fausto-Sterling A. Science matters, culture matters. Perspect Biol Med 46 (2003) 109-124
38. Becker J.B., Arnold A.P., Berkley K.J., Blaustein J.D., Eckel L.A., Hampson E., et al. Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior. Endocrinology 146 (2005) 1650-1673
39. Garcia A.M., Bartley M., and Alvarez-Dardet C. Engendering epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 61 (2007) 1-2