Consistency vs flexibility: The impact of employee voice in rule-based and discretionary decision procedures

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 279-295

  Hendrickson, Cheryl L ^a   Harrison, Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Consistency; Drug testing; Flexibility; Procedural justice; Voice

Indexed keywords

EID: 54749123628     PISSN: 08927545     EISSN: 15733378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1027348610041     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Angarola, R. T., & Rodriguez, S. N. (1989). State legislation: Effects on drug programs in industry. In S. W. Gust & J. M. Walsh (Eds.), Drugs in the Workplace: Research and Evaluation Data (NIDA Research Monograph 91, pp. 305-317). Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
2. Bayles, M. D. (1990). Procedural Justice: Allocating to Individuals. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
3. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & B. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1), pp. 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Brookler, R. (1992). Industry standards to workplace drug testing. Personnel Journal, 71, 128-132.
5. Conlon, D. E., Lind, A. E., & Lissak, R. I. (1989). Nonlinear and nonmonotonic effects of outcome on procedural and distributive fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1085-1099.
6. Cowan, T. R. (1987). Drugs and the workplace: To drug test or not to drug test? Public Personnel Management, 16, 313-322.
7. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.), pp. 131-143. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Cropanzano, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1995). Resolving the justice dilemma by improving the outcomes: The case of employee drug screening. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 221-243.
9. DeCresce, R., Lifshitz, M., Mazura, A., & Tilson, S. (1989). Drug Testing in the Workplace. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
10. Everson, N. R. (1987). The next step: Drug testing: It's a good idea and it's legal. In Drug Testing: Protection for Society or a Violation of Civil Rights? Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
11. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
12. Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79-90.
13. Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., Timmerman, T. A., Howes, J. C., & Mitchell, D. (1996). Elaborating procedural fairness: Justice becomes both simpler and more complex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 435-441.
14. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253-2261.
15. Folger, R., Sheppard, B. H., & Buttram, R. T. (1995). Equity, equality, and need: Three faces of social justice. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch, pp. 261-289. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Greenberg, J., Eskew, D. E., & Miles, J. A. (1991). Adherence to participatory norms as a moderator of the fair process effect: When voice does not enhance procedural justice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
17. Hammonds, K. H. (1996, September 16). Balancing work and family. Business Week, 74-80.
18. Hammonds, K. H. (1997, September 15). Work and family. Business Week, 96-99.
19. Howard, P. K. (1994). The Death of Common Sense: How Law is Suffocating America. New York: Random House.
20. Kidder, R. M. (1995). How Good People Make Tough Choices. New York: Morrow.
21. Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
22. Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Kulik, C. T., & Clark, S. C. (1992, August). Frustration Effects in Procedural Justice Research: The Case of Drug-Testing Legislation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
24. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relations. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 27-55. New York: Plenum.
25. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., Jr., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, pp. 167-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
27. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
28. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
29. Murphy, K. R., Thornton, G. C., & Prue, K. (1991). Influence of job characteristics on the acceptbility of employee drug testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 447-453.
30. Newcomb, M. D. (1988). Drug Use in the Workplace: Risk Factors for Disruptive Substance Use Among Young Adults. Dover. MA: Auburn House.
31. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Research: Methods and Data Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161-176.
33. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. H., & Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace. New York: Lexington Books.
34. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
35. Suh, Y. (1992). Instrumental and Noninstrumental Voice Effects on Perceptions of Procedural Justice in a Performance Appraisal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska at Omaha.
36. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
37. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
38. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22, 103-135.
39. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
40. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Urich, M. D. (1992). Are you positive the test is positive? HR Magazine, 37, 44-48.
42. van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046.