Interval breast cancers: Prognostic features and survival by subtype and time since screening

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 115-122

  Porter, Gareth J R ^a   Evans, A J ^a   Burrell, H C ^a   Lee, A H S ^a   Ellis, I O ^a   Chakrabarti, J ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMEDO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; TIME; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; VASCULAR TUMOR;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33749027478     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 09691413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/096914106778440572     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Liston J, Wilson R, eds. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening Radiology. NHSBSP Publication No 59: January 2005. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes
2. Burrell H, Sibbering D, Wilson A, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology 1996;199:615-20
3. Klemi P, Toikkanen S, Rasanen O, et al. Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening. Br J Cancer 1997;75:762-6
4. Cowan W, Angus B, Gray J, et al. A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme. J Clin Path 2000;53:140-6
5. Porter P, El-Bastawissi A, Mandelson M, et al. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval and screen detected cancers. J Nat Cancer Inst 1999;91:2022-8
6. Brekelmans C, Van Gorp J, Peeter P, et al. Histopathology and growth rate of interval breast carcinoma. Characterisation of different growth rates. Cancer 1996;78:1220-8
7. Ikeda B, Andersson I, Wattsgard C, et al. Interval cancers in the Malmo mammographic screening trial: radiographic appearances and prognostic considerations. AJR 1992;159:287-94
8. Heuser L, Spratt S, Kuhns J, et al. The association of pathologic and mammographic characteristics of primary human breast cancers with 'slow' and 'fast' growth rates and with axillary lymph node metastases. Cancer 1984; 53:96-8
9. Holmberg L, Tabar L, Adami H, et al. Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations. Lancet 1986;2:27-30
10. Brekelmans C, Peeters P, Deurenberg J, et al. Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programme. Eur J Cancer 1995;31:1830-5
11. Frisell J, von Rosen A, Wiege M, et al. Interval cancer and survival in a randomised breast cancer screening trial in Stockholm. Breast cancer Res Treat 1992;24:11-16
12. Vitak B, Olsen K, Manson J, et al. Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers. Eur Radiol 1999;9:460-9
13. Ellis I, Galea M, Broughton N, et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1992;20:479-89
14. Elston C, Ellis I. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long term follow up. Histopathology 1991;19:403-10
15. Collins S, Woodman C, Threlfall A, et al. Survival rates from interval cancer in NHS breast screening programme. BMJ 1998;316:832-3
16. James J, Evans A, Pinder S, et al. Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive cancers? Clin Rad 2003;58:54-62
17. Tabar L, Chen T, Yen A, et al. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14mm breast cancer. Cancer 2004;101:1745-59
18. Evans A, Pinder S, James J, et al. Is mammographic spiculation an independent good prognostic factor in screen detected invasive breast cancer. AJR (in press)
19. Elston C, Ellis I. Classification of malignant breast disease. The Breast, Systemic Pathology, Volume 13. 3rd edn. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 1998;243
20. Elston C, Ellis I. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long term follow up. Histopathology 1991;19:403-10
21. Bane A, Tjan S, Parkes R, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: to grade or not to grade. Mod Pathol 2005;18:621-8
22. Cornford E, Wilson A, Athanassiou E, et al. Mammographic features of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a comparative analysis. Br J Radiol 1995;68:450-3