Connective tissue progenitor cell growth characteristics on textured substrates

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 389-406

  Mata, Alvaro ^a,b   Boehm, Cynthia ^b   Fleischman, Aaron J ^b   Muschler, George F ^b   Roy, Shuvo ^b  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone grafts; Connective tissue progenitor cells; MEMS; Microelectromechanical systems; Osteoprogenitors; PDMS; Polydimethylsiloxane; Stem cells; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN; DIMETICONE;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEM; OSTEOBLAST; STANDARDIZATION; STEM CELL MOBILIZATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NYLONS; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 54349114795     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bone grafting CHC medical library and patient education: 1999. Bone grafts and bone substitutes. Orthopedic Network News. 10:10-17;2003. Synthetic bone graft to be tested in revision hip surgery, Bioportfolio; (2005). Bone grafting, The Cleveland Clinic.
2. Alaerts JA, VM De Cupere, et al. 2001. Surface characterization of poly(methyl methacrylate) microgrooved for contact guidance of mammalian cells. Biomaterials, 22(12):1635-42.
3. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. 2000. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 371:10-27.
4. Brunette DM. 1986. Fibroblasts on micromachined substrata orient hierarchically to grooves of different dimensions. Experimental Cell Research, 164(1):11-26.
5. Brunette DM. 1986. Spreading and orientation of epithelial cells on grooved substrata. Experimental Cell Research, 167(1):203-17.
6. Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. 1999. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 121(1):49-57.
7. Chen CS, Mrksich M, et al. 1998. Micropatterned surfaces for control of cell shape, position, and fuction. Biotechnology Progress, 14(3):356-63.
8. Craighead, HG, Turner SW, et al. 1998. Chemical and topographical surface modification for control of central nervous system cell adhesion. Biomedical Microdevices, 1(1):49-64.
9. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. 1997. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials, 18(24):1573-83.
10. den Braber ET, Ruijter JE, et al. 1996. Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 17(21): 2037-44.
11. den Braber ET, Ruijter JE, et al. 1998. Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 40(2):291-300.
12. den Braber ET, Ruijter JE, et al. 1995. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 29:511-8.
13. den Braber ET, Ruijter JE, et al. 1996. Quantitative analysis of cell proliferation and orientation on substrata with uniform parallel surface micro-grooves. Biomaterials, 17(11):1093-9.
14. Desai TA. 2000. Micro- and nanoscale structures for tissue engineering constructs. Medical Engineering Physics, 22(9):595-606.
15. Deutsch JD, Motlagh, et al. 2000. Fabrication of microtextured membranes for cardiac myocyte attachment and orientation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 53(3):267-75.
16. Dobereiner HG, Dubin-Thaler BJ, et al. 2005. Force sensing and generation in cell phases: analyses of complex functions. J Appl Physiol, 98(4):1542-6.
17. Dubin-Thaler, BJ, Giannone G, et al. 2004. Nanometer analysis of cell spreading on matrix-coated surfaces reveals two distinct cell states and STEPs. Biophys J, 86(3):1794-806.
18. Fleming JE, Cornell CN, et al. 2000. Bone cells and matrices in orthopedic tissue engineering. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 31(3): 357-74.
19. Green AM, Jansen JA, et al. 1994. Fibroblast response to microtextured silicone surfaces: Texture orientation into or out of the surface. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 28(5):647-53.
20. Kapur R, Spargo BJ, et al. 1996. Fabrication and selective surface modification of 3-dimensionally textured biomedical polymers from etched silicon substrates. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 33(4): 205-16.
21. Lyman DJ, Muir WM, et al. 1965. The effect of chemical structure and surface properties of polymers on the coagulation of blood. I. Surface free energy effects. Transactions of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, 11:301-306.
22. Majors AK, Boehm CA, et al. 1997. Characterization of human marrow stromal cells with respect to osteoblastic differentiation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 15(4):546-57.
23. Mata A, Boehm C, et al. 2002. Analysis of connective tissue progenitor cell behavior on polydimethylsioxane smooth and channel micro-textures. Biomedical Microdevices, 4(4):267-75.
24. Mata A, Boehm C, et al. 2002. Growth of connective tissue progenitor cells on microtextured polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 62(4):499-506.
25. Mata A, Fleischman AJ, et al. 2004. Microfabricated 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. MRS Fall Meeting: Nanoscale materials science in biology and medicine.
26. Mata A, Su X, et al. 2003. Osteoblast attachment to a textured surface in the absence of exogenous adhesion proteins. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, 2(4):287-94.
27. Muschler GF, Boehm CA, et al. 1997. Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: The influence of aspiration volume. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 79(11):1699-709.
28. Muschler GF, Nitto H, et al. 2001. Age- and gender-related changes in the cellularity of human bone marrow and the prevalence of osteoblastic progenitors. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 19(1):117-25.
29. Muschler GF, Nitto H, et al. 2003. Spine fusion using cell matrix composites enriched in bone marrow-derived cells. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 407:102-118.
30. Nation JL, 1983. Anew method using Hexamethyldisilazane for preparation of soft insect tissues for scanning electron microscopy. Stain Technology, 58(6):347-51.
31. Ratner BD, 1996. Surface properties of biomaterials. Biomaterials Science. HA Ratner BD, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. San Diego CA, Academic Press:25.
32. Rich A, Harris AK, 1981. Anomalous preferences of cultured macrophages for hydrophobic and roughened substrata. Journal of Cell Science, 50(1):1-7.
33. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, et al. 2004. Bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future trends. Macromolecular Biosciences, 4(8):743-65.
34. Schimandle, JH, Boden SD. 1997. Bone substitutes for lumbar fusion: present and future. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 7(1):60-7.
35. Schmidt JA, von Recum AF. 1992. Macrophage response to microtextured silicone. Biomaterials, 13(15):1059-69.
36. Tsang, VL, Bhatia SN. 2004. Three-dimensional tissue engineering." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 56(11):1635-1647.
37. van Kooten TG, Whitesides JF, et al. 1998. Influence of silicone (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 43(1):1-14.
38. Vasanji A, Ghosh PK, et al. 2004. Polarization of plasma membrane microviscosity during endothelial cell migration. Developmental Cell, 6(1):29-41.
39. Webster TJ, Ergun C, et al 2000. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res, 51(3):475-83.
40. Xia Y, Whitesides GM. 1998. Soft lithography. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 37(5):550-75.