Cytotoxicity and shear bond strength of four orthodontic adhesive systems

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 495-502

  Jonke, Erwin ^a   Franz, Alexander ^a   Freudenthaler, Josef ^a   König, Franz ^b   Bantleon, Hans Peter ^a   Schedle, Andreas ^a,c  

^a Department of Orthodontics

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c Bernhard Gottlieb University Clinic of Dentistry   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DRUG EFFECT; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; L CELL; MATERIALS TESTING; MOUSE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SHEAR STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; L CELLS (CELL LINE); MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 54249098275     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn042     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aljubouri Y D, Millett D T, Gilmour W H 2004 Six and 12 months' evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Orthodontics 26: 565-571
2. Asgari S, Salas A, English J, Powers J 2002 Clinical evaluation of bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 36: 687-689
3. Bishara S E, Ostby A W, Ajlouni R, Laffoon J F, Warren J J 2006 Early shear bond strength of a one-step self-adhesive on orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontist 76: 693-698
4. Buonocore M 1955 A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research 38: 849-853
5. Chaconas J, Caputo A A, Niu G 1991 Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems. Angle Orthodontist 61: 35-42
6. Davidson W M, Sheinis E M, Sheperd S R 1982 Tissue reaction to orthodontic adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 502-507
7. Donmez N, Belli S, Pashley D H, Tay F R 2006 Ultrastructural correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in self-etch adhesives. Journal of Dental Research 84: 355-359
8. Dorminey J C, Dunn W J, Taloumis L J 2003 Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant-and-primer technique. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124: 410-413
9. Einot I, Gabriel K R 1975 A study of powers of several methods of multiple comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 574-583
10. Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Zinelis S, Eliades G 2004 Effect of loading rate on bond strength. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 65: 336-342
11. Forsten L 1984 Curing depth of visible light-activated composites. Acta Odontologia Scandinavica 42: 23-28
12. Franz A et al. 2003 Cytotoxic effects of packable and nonpackable dental composites. Dental Materials 19: 382-392
13. Franz A, Konradsson K, König F, van Dijken J W V, Schedle A 2006 Cytotoxicity of a calcium aluminate cement in comparison with other dental cements and resin-based materials. Acta Odontologia Scandinavica 64: 1-8
14. Franz A et al. 2007 Cytotoxicity of resin composites as a function of interface area. Dental Materials 23: 1438-1446
15. Gioka C, Bourauel C, Hiskia A, Kletsas D, Eliades T, Eliades G 2005 Light-cured or chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resin? A selection based on the degree of cure, monomer leaching, and cytotoxicity. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 127: 413-419
16. Glasspoole E A, Erickson R L, Davidson C L 2001 Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer. Dental Materials 17: 402-408
17. Graber T M, Eliades T, Anthanasiou A E 2004 Risk management in orthodontics: expert' s guide to malpractice. Quintessence, New York
18. Gwinnett A J 1988 A comparison of shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 93: 346-348
19. International Organization for Standardization 1999 ISO 10993-5 Biological evaluation of medical devices: Part 5. Test for cytotoxicity: in vitro methods. Geneva, Switzerland
20. International Organization for Standardization 2008 ISO/FDIS 7405 Dentistry - evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry. Geneva, Switzerland
21. Ireland A J, Hosein I, Sherriff M 2005 Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement. European Journal of Orthodontics 27: 413-419
22. Joseph V P, Rossouw P W 1990 The shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 66-71
23. Katona T R 1997 A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112: 244-251
24. Keizer S, ten Cate J M, Arends J 1976 Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 69: 318-327
25. Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B 2005 Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dental Materials 21: 391-396
26. Larmour C J, Bateman G, Stirrups D R 2006 An investigation into the bonding of orthodontic attachments to porcelain. European Journal of Orthodontics 28: 74-77
27. Lopez J 1980 Retentive shear bond strengths of various bonding attachment bases. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 669-678
28. McSherry P F 1996 An in vitro evaluation of the tensile and shear strengths of four adhesives used in orthodontics. European Journal of Orthodontics 18: 319-327
29. Miura F, Nakagawa K, Masuhara E 1971 New direct bonding system for plastic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 59: 350-361
30. Moin K, Dogon I L 1978 An evaluation of shear bond strengths measurements of unfilled and filled resin combinations. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 531-536
31. Newman G V 1965 Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. American Journal of Orthodontics 51: 901-912
32. Newman G V 1973 Current status of bonding attachments. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 7: 425-449
33. Pickett K, Sadowsky P L, Jacobson A, Lacefield W 2001 Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthodontist 71: 141-148
34. Reynolds I R 1975 A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British Journal of Orthodontics 2: 171-178
35. Ryan T A 1959 Multiple comparisons in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin 56: 26-47
36. Ryan T A 1960 Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. Psychological Bulletin 57: 318-328
37. Schedle A et al. 1995 Response of L-929 fibroblasts, human gingival fibroblasts, and human tissue mast cells to various metal cations. Journal of Dental Research 74: 1513-1520
38. Schedle A et al. 1998 Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements. Dental Materials 14: 429-440
39. Schulz R P, Mayhew R B, Oesterle L J, Pierson W P 1985 Bond strengths of three resin systems used with brackets and embedded wired attachments. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 75-80
40. Surmont P, Dermaut L, Martens L, Moors M 1992 Comparison in shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets between five bonding systems related to different etching times: an in vitro study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 101: 414-419
41. Tang A T H, Liu Y, Björkman L, Ekstrand J 1999 In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding resins on human oral fibroblasts. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 116: 132-138
42. Tell R T, Sydiskis R J, Isaacs R D, Davidson W M 1988 Long-term cytotoxicity of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 93: 419-422
43. Terhune W F, Sydiskis R J, Davidson W M 1983 In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding materials. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 501-506
44. Thind B S, Stirrups D R, Lloyd C H 2006 A comparison of tungsten-quartz-halogen, plasma arc and light-emitting diode light sources for the polymerization of an orthodontic adhesive. European Journal of Orthodontics 28: 78-82
45. Trimpeneers L M, Verbeeck R M H, Dermaut L R, Moors M G 1996 Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. European Journal of Orthodontics 18: 89-95
46. Vicente A, Bravo L A, Romero M 2006 Self-etching primer and a non-rinse conditioner versus phosphoric acid: alternative methods for bonding brackets. European Journal of Orthodontics 28: 173-178
47. Watts D C, Amer O, Combe E C 1984 Characteristics of visible-light activated composite systems. British Dental Journal 56: 209-215
48. Welsch R E 1977 Stepwise multiple comparison procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 72: 359
49. William M D, Edward M S, Stephen R S 1982 Tissue reaction to orthodontic adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 502-507
50. Zentner A, Sergl H G, Kretscher A 1994 An in-vitro study of 2 resins used in orthodontics for their cell toxicity. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 55: 311-318
51. Zeppieri I L, Chung C-H, Mante F K 2003 Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124: 414-419