Effect of loading rate on bond strength;Auswirkung der Vorschubgeschwindigkeit auf die Haftfestigkeit

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 336-342

  Eliades, Theodore ^a,b   Katsavrias, Elias ^a   Zinelis, Spiros ^a   Eliades, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Bond strength; Brackets; Loading rate

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; STAINLESS STEEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENAMEL; LONG TERM CARE; MASTICATION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEAR STRESS; STANDARD; STANDARDIZATION; VELOCITY; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 4444368997     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-004-0327-x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson K, Throckmorton GS, Buschang PH, et al. The effects of bolus hardness on masticatory kinematics. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:689-96.
2. Braem M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G, et al. The relationship between test methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987;5:1036-9.
3. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al. Stiffness increase during the setting of dental composite resins. J Dent Res 1987;66:1713-6.
4. Buschang PH, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton GS. Quantification of human chewing-cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol 2000 45:461-74.
5. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1988;1:29-36.
6. Chabrier F, Lloyd CH, Scrimgeour SN. Measurement at low strain rates of the elastic properties of a dental polymeric material. Dent Mater 1999;1:33-8.
7. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000;1:13-25.
8. Eliades T, Viazis AD, Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: Morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:369-75.
9. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21:33-43.
10. Kandil SH, Kamar AA, Shaabam SA, et al. Effect of temperature and ageing on the mechanical properties of dental polymeric composite materials. Biomaterials 1989;8:540-5.
11. Kao EC, Eliades T, Rezvan E, et al. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:533-40.
12. Karlsson S, Persson M, Carlsson GE. Mandibular movement and velocity in relation to state of dentition and age. J Oral Rehabil 1991;18:1-8.
13. Katona TR, Chen J. Engineering and experimental analyses of the tensile loads applied during strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:167-74.
14. Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:132-41.
15. Moseley HC, Horrocks EN, Pearson GJ, et al. Effects of cyclic stressing on attachment bond strength using glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Br J Orthod 1995;22:23-7.
16. Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Millett DT. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding. Br J Orthod 1999;2:141-6.
17. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. New York: Freeman, 1981;327.
18. Suresh S. Fatigue of materials. London: Cambridge University Press, 1992;473-4.