Enrichment can damp population cycles: A balance of inflexible and flexible interactions

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1732-1740

  Mougi, Akihiko ^a,b   Nishimura, Kinya ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; FOOD WEB; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GENERALIST; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; POPULATION CYCLE; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPECIALIST;

EID: 55049108073     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16688.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrams, P. A. Roth, J. D. 1994. The effect of enrichment of three-species food chains with nonlinear functional responses Ecology 75 : 1118 1130.
2. Abrams, P. A. Walters, C. J. 1996. Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment Ecology 77 : 1125 1133.
3. Abrams, P. A. Quince, C. 2005. The impact of mortality on predator population size and stability in systems with stage-structured prey Theor. Popul. Biol. 68 : 253 266.
4. Anderson, T. et al. 2004. Stoichiometry and population dynamics Ecol. Lett. 7 : 884 900.
5. Arditi, R. Ginzburg, L. R. 1989. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence J. Theor. Biol. 139 : 311 326.
6. Arditi, R. et al. 2004. Does mutual interference always stabilize predator-prey dynamics? A comparison of models Compt. Rend. Biologies 327 : 1037 1057.
7. Fryxell, J. M. Lundberg, P. 1994. Diet choice and predator-prey dynamics Evol. Ecol. 8 : 407 421.
8. Gatto, M. 1991. Some remarks on models of plankton densities in lakes Am. Nat. 137 : 264 267.
9. Genkai-Kato, M. Yamamura, N. 1999. Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 : 1215 1219.
10. Gilpin, M. E. 1972. Enriched predator-prey systems: theoretical stability Science 177 : 902 904.
11. Gilpin, M. E. 1975. Group selection in predator-prey communities. Princeton Univ. Press.
12. Grover, J. P. 1995. Competition, herbivory, and enrichment: nutrient-based models for edible and inedible plants Am. Nat. 145 : 746 774.
13. Holyoak, M. 2000. Effects of nutrient enrichment on predator-prey metapopulation dynamics J. Animal. Ecol. 69 : 985 997.
14. Huffaker, C. B. et al. 1963. Experimental studies on predation: complex dispersion and levels of food in an acarine predator-prey interaction Hilgardia 34 : 305 330.
15. Huisman, J. Weissing, F. J. 1999. Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos Nature 401 : 407 410.
16. Hutchinson, G. E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton Am. Nat. 95 : 137 145.
17. Jansen, V. A. A. 1995. Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions: a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment Oikos 74 : 384 390.
18. Jensen, C. X. J. Ginzburg, L. R. 2005. Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out Ecol. Modell. 188 : 3 14.
19. Kirk, K. L. 1998. Enrichment can stabilize population dynamics: autotoxins and density dependence Ecology 79 : 2456 2462.
20. Klepac, et al. 2007. Dispersal delays, predator-prey stability, and the paradox of enrichment. Theor. Popul. Biol 436 444.
21. Kondoh, M. 2003. Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food web complexity and stability Science 299 : 1388 1391.
22. Kretzschmar, M. et al. 1993. A predator-prey model for zooplankton grazing on competing algal populations Theor. Popul. Biol. 44 : 32 66.
23. Luckinbill, L. S. 1974. The effect of space and enrichment on a predator-prey system Ecology 55 : 1142 1147.
24. Ma, B. O. et al. 2003. Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice Am. Nat. 162 : 668 684.
25. May, R. M. 1972. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238 : 413 414.
26. McAllister, C. D. et al. 1972. Stability of enriched aquatic ecosystems Science 175 : 562 564.
27. McCann, K. S. 2000. The diversity-stability debate Nature 405 : 228 233.
28. McCann, K. S. et al. 1998. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature Nature 395 : 794 798.
29. McCauley, E. Murdoch, W. W. 1990. Predator-prey dynamics in environments rich and poor in nutrients Nature 343 : 455 457.
30. McCauley, E. et al. 1999. Large-amplitude cycles of Daphnia and its algal prey in enriched environment Nature 402 : 653 656.
31. Mougi, A. Nishimura, K. 2007. A resolution of the paradox of enrichment J. Theor. Biol. 248 : 194 201.
32. Murdoch, W. W. et al. 1998. Plankton abundance and dynamics across nutrient levels: tests of hypotheses Ecology 79 : 1339 1356.
33. Neutel, A. M. et al. 2002. Stability in real food web: weak links in long loops Science 296 : 1120 1123.
34. Persson, A. et al. 2001. Effects of enrichment on simple aquatic food webs Am. Nat. 157 : 654 669.
35. Petrovskii, et al. 2004. Transition to spatiotemporal chaos can resolve the paradox of enrichment. Ecol. Complex. 1 37 47.
36. Pimm, S. L. 1991. The balance of Nature?. Univ. of Chicago Press.
37. Prigogine, I. Stengers, I. 1984. Science and Change. Bantam Books.
38. Rall, B.C. et al. 2008. Food-web connectance and predator interference dampen the paradox of enrichment Oikos 117 : 202 213.
39. Riebesell, J. F. 1974. Paradox of enrichment in competitive systems Ecology 55 : 183 187.
40. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1971. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time Science 29 : 385 387.
41. Roy, S. Chattopadhyay, J. 2007a. Enrichment and ecosystem stability: effect of toxic food Biosystems 90 : 151 160.
42. Roy, S. Chattopadhyay, J. 2007b. The stability of ecosystems: a brief overview of the paradox of enrichment J. Biosci. 32 : 421 428.
43. Steiner, C. F. et al. 2005. Temporal stability of aquatic food webs: partitioning the effects of species diversity, species composition and enrichment Ecol. Lett. 8 : 819 828.
44. Stephens, D. W. Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press.
45. Vandermeer, J. 2006. Oscillating populations and biodiversity maintenance BioScience 56 : 967 975.
46. Verschoor, A. M. et al. 2004. Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi- and tritrophic food chains Ecol. Lett. 7 : 1143 1148.
47. Vos, M. et al. 2001. Does 'supersaturated coexistence' resolve the 'paradox of the plankton'? Ecol. Lett. 4 : 404 407.
48. Vos, M. et al. 2004. Inducible defences and paradox of enrichment Oikos 105 : 471 480.
49. Yamauchi, A. Yamamura, N. 2005. Effects of defense evolution and diet choice on population dynamics in a one-predator-two-prey system Ecology 86 : 2513 2524.
50. Yodzis, P. Innes, S. 1992. Body size and consumer-resource dynamics Am. Nat. 139 : 1151 1175.