Accurate temperature imaging based on intermolecular coherences in magnetic resonance

Science

Volumn 322, Issue 5900, 2008, Pages 421-424

  Galiana, Gigi ^a,b   Branca, Rosa T ^b   Jenista, Elizabeth R ^b   Warren, Warren S ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAT; WATER;

IMAGING METHOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC PROPERTY; RESONANCE; TEMPERATURE PROFILE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; IMAGING SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; ROTATION; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; TEMPERATURE IMAGING; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMOMETRY;

ANIMALS; BODY TEMPERATURE; LIPIDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, OBESE; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

EID: 54249084562     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1163242     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. B. Conti et al., Science 314, 825 (2006).
2. J. Overgaard, in Hyperthermic Oncology, vol. 2, J. Overgaard, Ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1985), pp. 325-338.
3. J. Van der Zee, Ann. Oncol. 13, 1173 (2002).
4. E. L. Jones et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3079 (2005).
5. P. Wust et al., Lancet 3, 487 (2002).
6. T. Hehr, P. Wust, M. Bamberg, W. Budach, Oncologie 26, 295 (2003).
7. G. P. Raaphorst, in An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Clinical Hyperthermia, S. B. Field, J. W. Hand, Eds. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990), pp. 10-54.
8. M. B Yatvin, J. N. Weinstein, W. H. Dennis, R. Blumenthal, Science 202, 1290 (1978).
9. G. Kong, R. D. Braun, M. W. Dewhirst, Cancer Res. 60, 4440 (2000).
10. M. H. Gaber et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 36, 1177 (1996).
11. D. Needham, G. Anyarambhatla, G. Kong, M. W. Dewhirst, Cancer Res. 60, 1197 (2000).
12. M. Dewhirst et al., Int. J. Hyperthermia 21, 779 (2005).
13. W. S. Warren, W. Richter, A. H. Andreotti, B. T. Farmer II, Science 262, 2005 (1993).
14. Q. He, W. Richter, S. Vathyam, W. S. Warren, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6779 (1993).
15. S. Lee, W. Richter, S. Vathyam, W. S. Warren, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 874 (1996).
16. S. Vathyam, S. Lee, W. S. Warren, Science 272, 92 (1996).
17. Y.-Y. Lin, N. Lisitza, S. Ahn, W. S. Warren, Science 290, 118 (2000).
18. C. Faber, D. Balla, J. Magn. Reson. 161, 265 (2003).
19. G. Galiana, R. T. Branca, W. S. Warren, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 17574 (2005).
20. Z. Chen, Z. Z. Chen, J. H. Zhong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 446 (2004).
21. Y. Y. Lin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3732 (2000).
22. B. Denis de Senneville, B. Quesson, C. T. W. Moonen, Int. J. Hyperthermia 21, 515 (2005).
23. J. Gellermann et al., Int. J. Hyperthermia 21, 497 (2005).
24. Y. Ishihara et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 814 (1995).
25. J. Hindman, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 4582 (1966).
26. N. McDannold et al., Radiology 230, 743 (2004).
27. S. K. Hekmatyar, P. Hopewell, S. K. Pakin, A. Babsky, N. Bansal, Magn. Reson. Med. 53, 294 (2005).
28. C. Li, X. Pan, Q. Zhang, K. Ying, Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 15, 3372 (2007).
29. V. Rieke et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 51, 1223 (2004).
30. K. Kuroda et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 43, 220 (2000).
31. R. D. Peters, R. S. Hinks, R. M. Henkelman, Magn. Reson. Med. 41, 909 (1999).
32. A. Boss et al., J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22, 813 (2005).
33. A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Clarendon, Oxford, 1961).
34. Susceptibility changes that occur over the correlation distance, typically tens of microns, still do contribute to the iZQC linewidths. However, in almost any realistic samples, susceptibility changes that occur over this distance are necessarily far smaller than those seen across an entire voxel, leading to substantial line narrowing.
35. Although we use the iZQC nomenclature here, as discussed in (17), (27), and numerous other places, it is also possible in principle to calculate these effects using Bloch equations adapted to include a nonlinear term - the distant dipolar field - and this method is useful for numerical simulations. However, the nonlinearities in that picture dramatically reduce its intuitive value; for example, it is very hard to explain why peaks at the difference frequency are insensitive to inhomogeneous broadening.
36. This work was funded by NIH grants EB2122 and EB5979. We thank M. Dewhirst for useful discussions.