Sisterhood and tonal scaling

Studia Linguistica

Volumn 59, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 223-243

  Féry, Caroline ^a   Truckenbrodt, Hubert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745296678     PISSN: 00393193     EISSN: 14679582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00127.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. BECKMAN, M. E. & PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255-309.
2. CONNELL, B. & LADD, D. R. 1990. Aspects of pitch realization in Yoruba. Phonology 7, 1-29.
3. COOPER, W. & SORENSEN, J. 1981. Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Heidelberg. New York: Springer.
4. FÉRY, C. 1992. Focus, topic and intonation in German. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, 20. University of Tübingen.
5. FÉRY, C. 1993. German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
6. FÉRY, C. & HARTMANN, K. 2005. Focus and prosodic structure of German gapping and right node raising. The Linguistic Review 22, 67-114.
7. FITZPATRICK-COLE, J. 1999. The alpine intonation of Bern Swiss German. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 941-944.
8. KUBOZONO, H. 1989. Syntactic and rhythmic effects of downstep in Japanese. Phonology 6, 39-67.
9. LADD, D. R. 1983. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language 59, 721-759.
10. LADD, D. R. 1986. Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure, phonology yearbook 3, 311-340.
11. LADD, D. R. 1988. Declination 'reset' and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84, 530-544.
12. LADD, D. R. 1990. Metrical representation of pitch register. In Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, eds. J. Kingston & M. Beckman, 35-57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. LANIRAN, Y. 1992. Intonation in tone languages: The phonetic implementation of tones in Yorùbá. Cornell University. PhD diss.
14. LIBERMAN, M. & PRINCE, A. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249-336.
15. NESPOR, M. & VOGEL, I. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
16. PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. MIT. PhD diss.
17. PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. & BECKMAN, M. E. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. SELKIRK, E. O. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 563-605.
19. THORSEN, N. 1980. Intonation patterns and stress group patterns in declarative sentences of varying length in ASC Danish. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen, vol. 14, 1-29.
20. TRUCKENBRODT, H. 2002. Upstep and embedded register levels. Phonology 19, 77-120.
21. TRUCKENBRODT, H. 2004. Final lowering in non-final position. Journal of Phonetics 32, 313-348.
22. TRUCKENBRODT, H. To appear. Upstep on edge tones and on nuclear accents. In Tone and intonation (working title), eds. C. Gussenhoven & T. Riad. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
23. TRUCKENBRODT, H. & FÉRY, C. 2004. More on hierarchical organization and tonal scaling. Ms. University of Potsdam and University of Tübingen. [Intended for publication in Phonology].
24. VAN DEN BERG, R., GUSSENHOVEN, C. & RIETVELD, T. 1992. Downstep in Dutch: Implications for a model. In Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, eds. G. J. Docherty & D. R. Ladd, 335-367. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.