Control of robot manipulators in terms of quasi-velocities

Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 205-221

  Kozlowski K ^a   Herman, P ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Control; Gravitational forces; Quasi velocities; Robots

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DYNAMICS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; LITHIUM; LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS; MANIPULATORS; MECHANICS; ROBOT APPLICATIONS; ROBOTS; SLIDING MODE CONTROL; TRAJECTORIES; VELOCITY;

ASYMPTOTICALLY STABLES; CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROLS; CONTROL ALGORITHMS; CONTROL LAWS; CONTROL SCHEMES; DECOUPLED CONTROLS; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; END POINTS; FORWARD DYNAMICS; GRAVITATIONAL FORCES; LAGRANGIAN DYNAMICS; MASS MATRIXES; MULTIBODY DYNAMICS; NUMBER OF DEGREES OF FREEDOMS; QUASI-VELOCITIES; RECURSIONS; ROBOT CONTROL ALGORITHMS; ROBOT MANIPULATORS; SLIDING-MODE CONTROLS; SPATIAL VELOCITIES; TASK SPACES; TRAJECTORY TRACKING;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 54149100322     PISSN: 09210296     EISSN: 15730409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-008-9237-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. G. Besançon 2000 Global output feedback tracking control for a class of Lagrangian systems Automatica 36 1915 1921
2. Brandl, H., Johanni, R., Otter, M.: A very efficient algorithm for the simulation of robots and similar multibody systems without inversion of the mass matrix. In: Proc. of the IFAC (IFIF) IMACS Int. Symp. on the Theory of Robots, pp. 365-370, Vienna, 3-5 December 1986
3. Canudas de Wit, C., Siciliano, B., Bastin, G. (eds.): Theory of Robot Control. Springer, London (1996)
4. Featherstone, R.: Robot Dynamics Algorithms. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1987)
5. R. Featherstone 1999a A divide-and-conquer articulated-body algorithm for paraller O(log(n)) calculation of rigid-body dynamics. Part 1: basic algorithm Int. J. Rob. Res. 18 867 875
6. R. Featherstone 1999b A divide-and-conquer articulated-body algorithm for paraller O(log(n)) calculation of rigid-body dynamics. Part 2: trees, loops, and accuracy Int. J. Rob. Res. 18 876 892
7. Featherstone, R., Orin, D.: Robot dynamics: equations and algorithms. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 826-833, San Francisco, CA, April 2000
8. Herman, P., Kozłowski, K.: A comparison of certain quasi-velocities approaches in PD joint space control. In: Proc. of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp. 3819-3824, Seoul, 21-26 May 2001
9. A. Jain G. Rodriguez 1995 Diagonalized Lagrangian robot dynamics IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 11 4 571 584
10. Khosla, P.K.: Real-time control and identification of direct-drive manipulators. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University (1986)
11. K. Kozłowski 1995a Robot dynamics models in terms of generalized and quasi-coordinates: a comparison Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 5 2 305 328
12. Kozłowski, K.: Standard and diagonalized Lagrangian dynamics: a comparison. In: Proc. of the 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2823-2828. IEEE, Piscataway (1995b)
13. Kozłowski, K.: Identification of articulated body inertias and decoupled control of robots in terms of quasi-coordinates. In: Proc. of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 317-322. IEEE, Piscataway (1996a)
14. K. Kozłowski 1996b Diagonalized equations of motion: numerical results and computational complexity Arch. Control Sci. 5(XLI) 1-2 61 85
15. K. Kozłowski 1996c Standard and diagonalized lagrangian dynamics for robot manipulators Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 76 S3 479 480
16. Kozłowski, K.: Robot control algorithms in terms of quasi-coordinates. In: Proc. of the 34 Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3020-3025, Kobe, 11-13 December 1996 (1996d)
17. Kozłowski, K., Dutkiewicz, P., Wroblewski, W.: Modeling and Control of Robots. National Scientific, Warsaw (2003) (in Polish)
18. Kozłowski, K., Herman, P.: A comparison of control algorithms for serial manipulators in terms of quasi-velocities. In: Proc. of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS 2000, pp. 1540-1545, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, 30 October-5 November 2000
19. Kwatny, H.G., Blankenship, G.L.: Nonlinear Control and Analytical Mechanics. Birkhäuser, Boston (2000)
20. A. Loria K. Melhem 2002 Position feedback global tracking control of el systems: a state transformation approach IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 47 5 841 847
21. J.Y.S. Luh M.W. Walker R.P. Paul 1980 Resolved acceleration control of mechanical manipulators IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 25 3 468 474
22. MATLAB: User's Guide. The Mathworks, Natick (1994)
23. S. McMillan D.E. Orin 1995 Efficient computation of articulated-body inertias using successive axial screws IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 11 606 611
24. G. Rodriguez A. Jain K. Kreutz-Delgado 1991 A spatial operator algebra for manipulator modeling and control Int. J. Rob. Res. 10 371 381
25. Rodriguez, G., Kreutz, K.: Recursive Mass Matrix Factorization and Inversion, An Operator Approach to Open- and Closed-Chain Multibody Dynamics, Report no. 88-11. JPL, Dartmouth (1988)
26. Rodriguez, G., Scheid, R.E.: Recursive Inverse Kinematics for Robot Arms via Kalman Filtering and Bryson-Frazier Smoothing. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 192-198. Monterey, CA, August 1987
27. Sciavicco, L., Siciliano, B.: Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996).
28. J.-J. Slotine W. Li 1987 On the adaptive control of robot manipulators Int. J. Rob. Res. 6 3 49 59
29. Slotine, J.-J., Li, W.: Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)
30. Spong, M.: Remarks on robot dynamics: canonical transformations and Riemannian geometry. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 554-559, Nice, May 1992
31. M. Takegaki S. Arimoto 1981 A new feedback method for dynamic control of manipulators ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 103 119 125
32. M.W. Walker D.E. Orin 1982 Efficient dynamics computer simulation of robotics mechanisms J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 104 205 211
33. J.T. Wen D.S. Bayard 1988 New class of control laws for robotic manipulators. Part 1. Non-adaptive case Int. J. Control 47 5 1361 1385
34. J.T. Wen 1990 A unified perspective on robot control: the energy lyapunov function approach Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 4 487 500