Effects of familiarity on neural activity in monkey inferior temporal lobe

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2540-2552

  Anderson, Britt ^a,b   Mruczek, Ryan E B ^a   Kawasaki, Keisuke ^a   Sheinberg, David ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evoked potentials; Familiarity; Local field; Monkey; Novelty; Potentials

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFERIOR TEMPORAL LOBE; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL; MEMORY; MONKEY; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIUNIT SPIKING ACTIVITY; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; EYE MOVEMENTS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 54149095092     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn015     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson B, Sanderson MI, Sheinberg DL. 2007. Joint decoding of visual stimuli by IT neurons' spike counts is not improved by simultaneous recording. Exp Brain Res. 176:1-11.
2. Anderson B, Sheinberg DL. Forthcoming. Effects of temporal context and temporal expectancy on neural activity in inferior temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia.
3. Brincat SL, Connor CE. 2006. Dynamic shape synthesis in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Neuron. 49:17-24.
4. DeAngelis GC, Cumming BG, Newsome WT. 1998. Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth. Nature. 394:677-680.
5. DeAngelis GC, Newsome WT. 1999. Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT. J Neurosci. 19:1398-1415.
6. Eckhorn R, Thomas U. 1993. A new method for the insertion of multiple microprobes into neural and muscular tissue, including fiber electrodes, fine wires, needles and microsensors. J Neurosci Methods. 49:175-179.
7. Efron B, Tibshirani R. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
8. Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller EK. 2006. Experience-dependent sharpening of visual shape selectivity in inferior temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 16:1631-1644.
9. Fujita I. 2002. The inferior temporal cortex: architecture, computation, and representation. J Neurocytol. 31:359-371.
10. Gothard KM, Erickson CA, Amaral DG. 2004. How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task? Anim Cogn. 7:25-36.
11. Green DM, Swets JA. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
12. Holscher C, Rolls ET, Xiang J. 2003. Perirhinal cortex neuronal activity related to long-term familiarity memory in the macaque. Eur J Neurosci. 18:2037-2046.
13. Kobatake E, Wang G, Tanaka K. 1998. Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 80:324-330.
14. Kreiman G, Hung CP, Kraskov A, Quiroga RQ, Poggio T, DiCarlo JJ. 2006. Object selectivity of local field potentials and spikes in the macaque inferior temporal cortex. Neuron. 49:433-445.
15. Li FF, VanRullen R, Koch C, Perona P. 2002. Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:9596-9601.
16. Li L, Miller EK, Desimone R. 1993. The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophys. 69:1918-1929.
17. Liu J, Newsome WT. 2006. Local field potential in cortical area MT: stimulus tuning and behavioral correlations. J Neurosci. 26:7779-7790.
18. Logothetis NK, Pauls J. 1995. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cereb Cortex. 5:270-288.
19. Logothetis NK, Sheinberg DL. 1996. Visual object recognition. Annu Rev Neurosci. 19:577-621.
20. Mitzdorf U. 1987. Properties of the evoked potential generators: current source-density analysis of visually evoked potentials in the cat cortex. Int J Neurosci. 33:33-59.
21. Miyashita Y. 2004. Cognitive memory: cellular and network machineries and their top-down control. Science. 306:435-440.
22. Mruczek RE, Sheinberg DL. 2007a. Activity of inferior temporal cortical neurons predicts recognition choice behavior and recognition time during visual search. J Neurosci. 27:2825-2836.
23. Mruczek RE, Sheinberg DL. 2007b. Context familiarity enhances target processing by inferior temporal cortex neurons. J Neurosci. 27:8533-8545.
24. Mruczek REB, Sheinberg DL. 2005. Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli. Percept Psychophys. 67:1016-1031.
25. Nielsen KJ, Logothetis NK, Rainer G. 2006. Dissociation between local field potentials and spiking activity in macaque inferior temporal cortex reveals diagnosticity-based encoding of complex objects. J Neurosci. 26:9639-9645.
26. Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Lauver SC, Toto LC. 1996. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. Acad Radiol. 3:1000-1006.
27. Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Mello-Thoms C, Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Sullivan DC, Conant EF. 1999. How experience and training influence mammography expertise. Acad Radiol. 6:575-585.
28. Nodine CF, Mello-Thoms C, Kundel HL, Weinstein SP. 2002. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. Am J Roentgenol. 179:917-923.
29. Paxinos G, Huang X-F, Toga AW. 2000. The rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
30. Peissig JJ, Singer J, Kawasaki K, Sheinberg DL. 2006. Effects of long-term object familiarity on event-related potentials in the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 17:1323-1334.
31. Reynolds JH, Chelazzi L. 2004. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci. 27:611-647.
32. Rossion B, Gauthier I, Goffaux V, Tarr MJ, Crommelinck M. 2002. Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychol Sci. 13:250-257.
33. Schmolesky MT, Wang Y, Hanes DP, Thompson KG, Leutgeb S, Schall JD, Leventhal AG. 1998. Signal timing across the macaque visual system. J Neurophys. 79:3272-3278.
34. Scott LS, Tanaka JW, Sheinberg DL, Curran T. 2006. A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 18:1453-1465.
35. Seltzer B, Pandya DN. 1991. Post-rolandic cortical projections of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 312:625-640.
36. Squire LR, Wixted JT, Clark RE. 2007. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci. 8:872-883.
37. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1994. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol. 350:497-533.
38. Swets JA. 1996. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers John A Swets. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Tamura H, Kaneko H, Kawasaki K, Fujita I. 2004. Presumed inhibitory neurons in the macaque inferior temporal cortex: visual response properties and functional interactions with adjacent neurons. J Neurophysiol. 91:2782-2796.
40. Tanaka JW, Curran T. 2001. A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychol Sci. 12:43-47.
41. Thompson KG, Hanes DP, Bichot NP, Schall JD. 1996. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. J Neurophysiol. 76:4040-4055.
42. Wang Q, Cavanagh P, Green M. 1994. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Percept Psychophys. 56:495-500.
43. Xiang JZ, Brown MW. 1998. Differential neuronal encoding of novelty, familiarity and recency in regions of the anterior temporal lobe. Neuropharmacology. 37:657.