Non-persistent effect of prior experience on change blindness: Investigation on naive observers

Psychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 115-125

  Takahashi, Kohske ^a,c   Watanabe, Katsumi ^a,b  

^a JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Change blindness; Eye movement; Prior experience; Visual search

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049144624     PISSN: 00332852     EISSN: 13475916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2008.115     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. 1998. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
2. Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. 2006. Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973-980.
3. Itti, L., & Baldi. P. 2006. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 1-8.
4. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. 1985. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
5. McCarley, J. S., Wang, R. F., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Peterson, M. S. 2003. How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
6. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. 2005. Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45, 205-231.
7. Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. 2001. Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
8. Rensink, R. A. 2002. Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
9. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. 1997. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
10. Rothkopf, C. A., Ballard, D. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. 2007. Task and context determine where you look. Journal of Vision, 7, 16.1-20.
11. Ryan, J. D., Althoff, R. R., Whitlow, S., & Cohen, N. J. 2000. Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory Psychological Science, 11, 454-461.
12. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17.
13. Simons, D. J. 2000. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
14. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. 1997. Change Blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
15. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. 2005. Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
16. Smith, C. N., Hopkins, R. O., & Squire, L. R. 2006. Experience dependent eye movements, awareness, and hippocampus-dependent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11304-11312.
17. Stirk, J. A., & Underwood, G. 2007. Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 1-10.
18. Takahashi, K., & Watanabe, K. 2008. Persisting effect of prior experience on change blindness. Perception, 37, 324-327.
19. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. 2006. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
20. Triesch, J., Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Sullivan, B. T. 2003. What you see is what you need. Journal of Vision, 3, 86-94.
21. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. 2004. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44, 1411-1426.
22. Yarbus, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. New York: Plenum.