Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 389-400

  Alonso, Fernando ^a   Lopez, Genoveva ^a   Manrique, Daniel ^a   Vines, Jose Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Aulatika SL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Instructional model; Learning objectives; Learning objects

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049121100     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290802377265     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Fernández, F.J. (2004). Constructing adapted E-learning courses on demand. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference E-Society, Avila, Spain.
2. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Vines, IM, (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 217-235.
3. Anderson, N.H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Anido, L., & Santos, J. (2001). A component model for standardized web-based education. Paper presented at the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, Hong Kong.
5. Atif, Y., Benlamri, R., & Berri, J. (2003). Learning objects based framework for self-adaptive learning. Education and Information Technologies, 8, 345-368.
6. Ausubel, D., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Book 1, Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
8. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.
9. Brown, B.M. (1998). Digital classrooms: Some myths about developing new educational programs using the internet. T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved September 3, 2005, from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/98/dec/feat04.html
10. Bruffee, K.A. (1987). The art of collaborative learning: Making the most of knowledgeable peers. Change, 19(2), 42-47.
11. Bruffee, K.A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change, 27(1), 12-18.
12. Carman, J.M. (2002). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Retrieved October 24, 2004, from http://www.knowledgenet.com/ pdf/Blended%20 Learning%20Desig.n_1028.PDF
13. Cey, T. (2001). Moving towards constructivist classrooms. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon.
14. Clark, R. (2003). Building expertise. Cognitive methods for training and performance improvement. Washington, DC: Book of International Society for Performance Improvement.
15. Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2002). E-Learning and the science of instruction. Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
16. Corich, S. (2004). Instructional design in the real world: A view from the trenches [Book review]. Educational Technology and Society, 1, 128-129.
17. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
18. Donovan, M.S., Bransford, J.D., & Pellegrino, J.W. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Washington, DC: National Research Council Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice.
19. Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
20. Good, T.L., & Brophy, J.E. (1990). Educational psychology: A realistic approach (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
21. Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-learning pedagogical considerations. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 287-299.
22. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (2004). Content packaging specification, version 1.1.2. Retrieved February 15, 2004, from, http://www.imsglobal.org/
23. INAP. (2005). Master in Information and. Communications Technologies. Retrieved November 24, 2005, from National Public Administration Institute web site: http://www.te.lein.ap.com
24. Ismael, J. (2002). The design of an e-learning system. Beyond the hype. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 329-336.
25. Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology and Research and Development, 39, 5-14.
26. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 17-27.
27. Keller, J.M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 8, 1-7.
28. Merrill, M.D. (1994). Instructional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.T: Educational Technology Publications.
29. Merrill, M.D. (1997, November-December). Instructional strategies that teach. CBT Solutions, pp. 1-11.
30. Michell, L. (2001, April). E-Learning methods offer a personalized approach. InfoWorld, pp. 174-185.
31. Muzio, J.A., Heins, T., & Mundell, R. (2002). Experiences with reusable e-learning objects. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 21-34.
32. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Pazos, J., Azpiazu, J., Silva, A., & Rodríguez-Patón, A. (2002). A virtual classroom based on academic memories. In Proceedings of Information Society and Education: Monitoring a Revolution. Badajoz, Spain: Government of Extremadura (pp. 87-92).
35. Sampson, D. (2002). An architecture for web-based e-learning promoting re-usable adaptive educational e-content. Educational Technology and Society Journal, 5(4), 27-37.
36. Schonotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning an d Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.
37. Schulman, L.S. (2002). Making differences: A table of learning. Change, 34, 36-44.
38. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2, 79-90.
39. Tallent-Runnels, M.K., Lan, W.Y., Fryer, W., Thomas, J.A., Cooper, S., & Wang, K. (2005). The relationship between problems with technology and graduate students' evaluations of online teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 167-174.
40. Tarn, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology and Society, 2, 124-138.
41. Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. London: VA Kogan.