Models of argumentation in educational discourse

Text

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 107-127

  Andrews, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument; Argumentation; Composition; Educational discourse; Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750180002     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.107     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andrews, R. (1992). An exploration of structural relationships in narrative and argumentative writing, with particular reference to the work of year 8 students. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hull
2. -(1995). Teaching and Learning Argument. London: Cassell
3. -(2000). Introduction: Learning to argue in higher education. In Learning to Argue in Higher Education, S. Mitchell and R. Andrews (eds.), 1-11. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton-Cook
4. Andrews, R. and Mitchell, S. (2001). Essays in Argument. (Research in Education Series). London: Middlesex University Press
5. Applebee, A. (1978). The Child's Concept of Story. Chicago: Chicago University Press
6. Barnes, D., Britton, J., and Rosen, H. (1969). Language, the Learner and the School. Har-mondsworth: Penguin
7. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press
8. Berrill, D. (ed.) (1996). Perspectives on Written Argument. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
9. Blair, J. A. (2002). The relationships among logic, dialectic and rhetoric. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, F. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), 125-131. Amsterdam: SicSat
10. Cockcroft, R. and Cockcroft, S. M. (1992). Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. London: Macmillan
11. Corbett, E. P. J. (1965). Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford University Press
12. Costello, P. J. M. and Mitchell, S. (eds.) (1995). Competing and Consensual Voices: The Theory and Practice of Argument. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
13. Driver, R., Newton, P., and Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education 84 (3): 297-312
14. Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (eds.) (1994). Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis
15. Fu1lkerson, R. (1996). Teaching the Argument in Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
16. Gage, J. T. (1996). The reasoned thesis. In Argument Revisited; Argument Redefined, B. Emmel, P. Resch, and D. Tenney (eds.). Thousand Oaks: Sage
17. Giere, R. N. (1991). Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 3rd ed. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Reinhart & Winston
18. Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
19. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society (T. McCarthy, trans.). London: Heinemann
20. Hegelund, S. and Kock, C. (2000). Macro-Toulmin: The argument model as structural guideline in academic writing. In Argumentation at the Century's Turn, C. Tindale, H. V. Hansen, and E. Sveda (eds.). Peterborough, Ontario: The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (CD-Rom, proceedings from the OSSA 1999 conference)
21. Honderich, T. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
22. Kaufer, D. and Geisler, C. (1991). A scheme for representing academic argument. The Journal of Advanced Composition 11: 107-122
23. Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press
24. Leith, R. and Myerson, G. (1989). The Power of Address: Explorations in Rhetoric. London: Routledge
25. Lunsford, K. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin's model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written Communication 19 (1): 109-174
26. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151-167
27. Mitchell, S. (1994). The Teaching and Learning of Argument in Sixth Forms and Higher Education: Final Report. Hull: University of Hull, Centre for Studies in Rhetoric
28. -(1997). Improving the Quality of Argument in Higher Education: Interim Report. London: Middlesex University, School of Lifelong Learning and Education
29. Mitchell, S. and Andrews, R. (2000). Learning to Argue in Higher Education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton-Cook
30. Mitchell, S. and Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the Quality of Argument in Higher Education: Final Report. Middlesex University, School of Lifelong Learning and Education
31. Myerson, G. (1992). The Argumentative Imagination: Wordsworth, Dryden, Religious Dialogues. Manchester: Manchester University Press
32. -(1994). Rhetoric, Reason and Society: Rationality as Dialogue. London: Sage
33. Riddle, M. (2000). Improving argument by parts. In Learning to Argue in Higher Education, S. Mitchell and R. Andrews (eds.), 53-64. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton-Cook
34. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
35. Tannen, D. (1991). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago
36. -(1999). The Argument Culture: Changing the Way We Argue and Debate. London: Virago
37. Tarnay, L. (2002). The conceptual basis of visual argumentation: A case for arguing in and through moving images. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, F. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), 1001-1005. Amsterdam: SicSat
38. Tindale, C, Hansen, H. V., and Sveda, E. (eds.) (2000). Argumentation at the Century's Turn. Peterborough, Ontario: The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (CD-Rom, proceedings from the OSS A 1999 conference)
39. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
40. -(2003). The Uses of Argument, updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
41. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., and Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning, 2nd ed. London: Collier Macmillan
42. Vickers, B. (1988). In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: The Clarendon Press
43. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
44. Walton, D. (1989). Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
45. Wenzel, J. (1980). Perspectives on argument. In Proceedings of the 1979 Summer Conference on Argumentation, J. Rhodes and S. Newell (eds.). Falls Church: SCA