Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 117, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 3126-3138

  Vandali, Andrew E ^a   Sucher, Catherine ^b   Tsang, David J ^b   McKay, Colette M ^b   Chew, Jason W D ^b   McDermott, Hugh J ^b  

^a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS; CONTINUOUS INTERLEAVED SAMPLING (CIT); PEAK DERIVED TIMING (PDT); PITCH RANKING;

ELECTRODES; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); FEATURE EXTRACTION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SPEECH CODING;

SPEECH;

ADULT; ADVANCED COMBINATORIAL ENCODER STRATEGY; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTINUOUS INTERLEAVED SAMPLING STRATEGY; ELECTRODE; F0 SYNCHRONIZED ACE STRATEGY; HEARING; HUMAN; MODULATION; MODULATION DEPTH ENHANCEMENT STRATEGY; MULTICHANNEL ENVELOPE MODULATION STRATEGY; PEAK DERIVED TIMING STRATEGY; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; SOUND; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH PERCEPTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 18744375750     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.1874632     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andersen, I., Weichbold, Y., and D'Haese, P. (2002). "Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor," Ear Nose Throat J. 81, 229-233.
2. Balkany, T., Hodges, A. V., and Luntz, M. (1996). "Update on cochlear implantation," Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 29, 277-289.
3. Barry, J. G., Blamey, P. J., Martin, L. F. A., Lee, K. Y. S., Tang, T., Ming, Y. Y., and van Hasselt, C. A. (2002). "Tone discrimination in Cantonese-speaking children using a cochlear implant," Clin. Linguist. Phon. 16, 79-99.
4. Boothroyd, A., Hanin, L., and Hnath, T. (1985). "A sentence test of speech perception: reliability, set equivalence, and short term learning (Internal Report RCI 10)," Speech & Hearing Sciences Research Center, City University of New York.
5. Busby, P. A., Whitford, L. A., Blamey, P. J., Richardson, L. M., and Clark, G, M. (1994). "Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2658-2669.
6. Busby, P. A., and Clark, G. M. (2000). "Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2658-2669.
7. Chatterjee, M., and Shannon, R. V. (1998). "Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2565-2572.
8. Ciocca, V., Francis, A. L., Aisha, R., and Wong, L. (2002). "The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2250-2256.
9. Garnham, C., O'Driscoll, M., Ramsden, And, R., and Saeed, S. (2002). "Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets," Ear Hear. 23, 540-552.
10. Geurts, L., and Wouters, I. (2001). "Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 713-726.
11. Geurts, L., and Wouters, J. (2004). "Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 844-852.
12. Gfeller, K., and Lansing, P. I. (1991). "Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users," J. Speech Hear. Res. 34, 916-920.
13. Gfeller, K., Christ, A., Knutson, I. F., Witt, S., Murray, K. T., and Tyler, R. S. (2000). "Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients," J. Am. Acad. Audiol 11, 390-406.
14. Gfeller, K., Turner, C., Mehr, M., Woodworm, G., Fearn, R., Knutson, I., Witt, S., and Stordahl, I. (2002). "Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults," Cochlear Implants International 3, 29-53.
15. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Woodworm, G., Mehr, M. A., and Knutson, J. (2002). "Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal," Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111(4), 349-356.
16. Green, T., Faulkner, A., and Rosen, S. (2004). "Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2298-2310.
17. Jones, P. A., McDermott, H. J., Seligman, P. M., and Millar, J. B. (1995). "Coding of voice-source information in the Nucleus cochlear implant system," Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104, 363-365.
18. Kong, Y.-Y., Cruz, R., Jones, I. A., and Zeng, F. G. (2004). "Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing," Ear Hear. 25, 173-185.
19. Leal, M. C., Shin, Y. J., Laborde, M. L., Calmels, M. N., Verges, S., Laugardon, S., Andrieu, S., Deguine, O., and Fraysse, B. (2003). "Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients," Acta Oto-Laryngol. 123, 826-835.
20. Lee, K. Y. S., van Hasselt, C. A., Chiu, S. N., and Cheung, D. M. C. (2002). "Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children in comparison with normal-hearing children," Int. J. Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol. 63, 137-147.
21. Loizou, P. C., Dorman, M. F., and Powell, V. (1998). "The recognition of vowels produced by men, women, boys, and girls by cochlear implant patients using a six-channel CIS processor," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 1141-1149.
22. Maurer, D., and Landis, T. (1995). "F0-dependence, number alteration, and non-systematic behavior of the formants in German vowels," Int. J. Neurosci. 83, 25-44.
23. McDermott, H. I. (2004). "Music perception with cochlear implants: A review," Trends in Amplification 8, 49-82.
24. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., and Clark, G. M. (1994). "Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2664-2673.
25. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., and Clark, G. M. (1995), "Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1777-1785.
26. McKay, C. M., and McDermott, H. J. (1996). "The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1081-1092.
27. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., and Carlyon, R. P. (2000). "Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent," ARLO 1, 25-30.
28. Moore, B. C., and Carlyon, R. P. (2005). "Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users," Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception, edited by C. J. Plack and A. J. Oxenham (Springer-Verlag, New York).
29. Nelson, D. A., Van Tasell, D. J., Schroder, A. C., Soli, S., and Levine, S. (1995). "Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1987-1999.
30. Osberger, M. J., and Fisher, L. (2001). "New directions in speech processing: Patient performance with simultaneous analog stimulation," Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 109, 70-73.
31. Peterson, G., and Lehiste, I. (1962). "Revised CNC lists for auditory tests," J. Speech Hear Disord. 27, 62-70.
32. Pijl, S., and Schwarz, D. W. (1995). "Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 886-895.
33. Pijl, S. (1997). "Pulse rate matching by cochlear implant patients: effects of loudness randomization and electrode position," Ear Hear. 18, 316-325.
34. Shannon, R. V. (1992). "Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2156-2164.
35. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues," Science 270, 303-304.
36. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Holden, T. A., Dowell, R. C., Seligman, P. M., Brimacombe, J. A., and Beiter, A. L. (1991). "Performance of post-linguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant," Ear Hear. 12, 3-22.
37. Skinner, M. W., Clarki G. M., Whitford, L. A., Seligman, P. A., Staller, S. J., Shipp, D. B., Shallop, J. K., Everingham, C., Menapace, C. M., Arndt, P. L., Antogenelli, T., Brimacombe, J. A., and Beiter, A. L. (1994). "Evaluation of a new spectral peak (SPEAK) coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system," Am. J. Otol. 15, 15-27.
38. Staller, S. J., Menapace, C., Domico, E., Mills, D., Dowell, R. C, Geers, A., Fiji, S., Hasenstab, S., Justus, M., Bruelli, T., Borton, A. A., and Lemay, M. (1997). "Speech perception abilities of adult and pediatric Nucleus implant recipients using the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) coding strategy," Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 117, 236-242.
39. Stone, M. A., and Moore, B. C. J. (2002). "Tolerable hearing-aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production," Ear Hear. 23, 325-338.
40. Tong, Y. C., and Clark, G. M. (1985). "Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1881.
41. Townshend, B., Cotter, N., Van Compernolle, D., and White, R. L. (1987). "Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 106-115.
42. van Hoesel, R. J., and Tyler, R. S. (2003). "Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1617-1630.
43. Vandali, A. E., Whitford, L. A., Plant, K. L., and Clark, G. M. (2000). "Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system," Ear Hear. 21, 608-624.
44. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T., Wolford, R. D., Eddington, D. K., and Rabinowitz, W. M. (1991). "Better speech recognition with cochlear implants," Nature (London) 352, 236-238.
45. Wilson, B., Finley, C., Lawson, D., and Zerbi, M. (1997). "Temporal representations with cochlear implants," Am. J. Otol. 18, s30-s34.