Acceptance or rejection of differentness: A social psychological perspective on the relation between migrants and members of the receiving society;Akzeptanz oder ablehnung von andersartigkeit. Die beziehung zwischen zuwanderern und einheimischen aus einer sozialpsychologischen perspektive

Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 60, Issue SUPPL. 48, 2008, Pages 513-528

  Mummendey, Amélie ^a   Kessler, Thomas ^b  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Acculturation; Ingroup projection model; Majority minority relation; Prejudice; Social discrimination

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049085005     PISSN: 00232653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Aiken, Leona S./West, Stephen G., 1991: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Allport, Gordon W., 1954: The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Berry, John W., 1984: Cultural Relations in Plural Societies: Alternatives to Segregation and their Socio-psychological Implications, in: Miller, N./Brewer, Marylin B. (Hrsg.) Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation. New York: Academic Press, 11-27.
4. Berry, John W., 1997: Immigration, Acculturation and Adaption, Applied Psychology, in: An international Review 46, 5-68.
5. Binder, Jens/Zagefka, Hanna/Brown, Rupert/Funke, Friedrich/Kessler, Thomas/Mummendey, Amélie/ Demoulin, Stéphanie/Leyens, Jacques-Philippe/Maquil, Annemie, im Druck: Does Contact Reduce Prejudice or Does Prejudice Reduce Contact? A Longitudinal Test of the Contact Hypothesis in Three European Countries, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychologie.
6. Bourhis, Richard Y./Moise, Léna C./Perreault, Stéphane/Senecal, Sacha, 1997: Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach, in: International Journal of Psychology 32, 369-389.
7. Brewer, Marylin B., 1979: In-group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive Motivational Analysis, in: Psychological Bulletin 86, 307-324.
8. th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 554-594.
9. Crandall, Christian S./Eshleman, Amy/O'Brien, Laurie, 2002: Social Norms and the Expression and Suppression of Prejudice: The Struggle for Internalization, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 359-378.
10. Gaertner, Samuel L./Dovidio, John F./Nier, Jason A./Ward, Christine M./Banker, Brenda, 1999: Across Cultural Divides: The Value of a Superordinate Identity, in: Prentice, D. A./Miller, D. T. (Hrsg.), Cultural Divides. Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 173-212.
11. Gaertner, Samuel L./Mann, Jeffrey A./Murrell, Audry/Dovidio, John F., 1989: Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 239-249.
12. Kessler, Thomas/Mummendey, Amélie, 2001: Is there any Sapegoat around? Determinants of Intergroup Conflict at Different Categorization Levels, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 1090-1102.
13. Kessler, Thomas/Mummendey, Amélie, 2008: Why do They not Perceive Us as We are? Ingroup Projection as a Source of Intergroup Misunderstanding, in: Demoulin, Stephanie/Leyens, Jacques-P./ Dovidio, J. F. (Hrsg.), Intergroup Misunderstandings: Impact of Divergent Social Realities. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
14. Kessler, Thomas/Mummendey, Amélie/Funke, Friedrich/Brown, Rupert/Binder, Jens/Zagefka, Hanna/Leyens, Jacques-P./Demoulin, Stéphanie/Maquil, Annemie, 2007: We all Live in Germany but ...: Ingroup Projection, Intergroup- Emotions and Prejudice against Immigrants. University of Jena (unpublished manuscript).
15. Mummendey, Amélie, 1995: Positive Distinctiveness and Social Discrimination: An Old Couple Living in Divorce, in: European Journal of Social Psychology 25, 657-670
16. Mummendey, Amélie/Otten, Sabine, 2001: Aversive Discrimination, in: Brown, R./Gaertner, S. (Hrsg.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 4: Intergroup Processes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 112-132.
17. Mummendey, Amélie/Wenzel, Michael, 1999: Social Discrimination and Tolerance in Intergroup Relations: Reactions to Intergroup Difference, in: Personality and Social Psychology Review 3, 158-174.
18. Rogosa, David, 1980: A Critique of Cross-lagged Correlation, in: Psychological Bulletin 88, 245-258.
19. Rosch, Elenor, 1975: Cognitive Reference Points, in: Cognitive Psychology 7, 532-547.
20. Rosch, Elenor, 1978: Principles of Categorization, in: Rosch, Elenor/Lloyd, B. (Hrsg.), Cognition and Categorization. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 27-48.
21. Smith, Heather J./Kessler, Thomas, 2003: Group-based Emotions and Intergroup Behavior: The Case of Relative Deprivation, in: Tiedens, L. Z/Leach, C. W. (Hrsg.), The Social Life of Emotions. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press, 43-63.
22. Smith, Heather J./Ortiz, Daniel J., 2002: Is it Just Me?: The Different Consequences of Personal and Group Relative Deprivation, in: Walker, I./Smith, Heather J. (Hrsg.), Relative Ceprivation: Specification, Development and Integration. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
23. Tajfel, Henry/Billig, Michael G./Bundy, Robert P./Flament, Claude, 1971: Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour, in: European Journal of Social Psychology 1, 149-178.
24. nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 7-24.
25. Turner, John C./Hogg, Michael A./Oakes, Penelope J./Reicher, Stephan D./Wetherell, Margaret S. (Hrsg.), 1987: Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. New York: Blackwell.
26. Waldzus, Sven/Mummendey, Amélie, 2004: Inclusion in a Superordinate Category, Ingroup Prototypicality, and Attitudes towards Outgroups, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40, 466-477.
27. Waldzus, Sven/Mummendey, Amélie/Wenzel, Michael, 2005: When "Different" Means "Worse": Ingroup Prototypicality in Changing Intergroup Contexts, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41, 76-83.
28. Waldzus, Sven/Mummendey, Amélie/Wenzel, Michael/Boetcher, Franziska, 2004: Of Bikers, Teachers and Germans: Groups' Diverging Views about their Prototypicality, in: British Journal of Social Psychology 43, 385-400.
29. Waldzus, Sven/Mummendey, Amélie/Wenzel, Michael/Weber, Ulrike, 2003: Towards Tolerance: Representations of Superordinate Categories and Perceived Ingroup Prototypicality, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39, 31-47.
30. Weber, Ulrike/Mummendey, Amélie/Waldzus, Sven, 2002: Perceived Legitimacy of Intergroup Status Differences: Its Predictions by Relative Ingroup Prototypicality, in: European Journal of Social Psychology 32, 449-470.
31. Wenzel Michael/Mummendey, Amélie/Waldzus, Sven, 2007: Superordinate Identities and Intergroup Conflict: The Ingroup Projection Model, in: European Review of Social Psychology 18, 331-372.
32. Wenzel, Michael/Mummendey, Amélie/Weber, Ulrike/Waldzus, Sven, 2003: The Ingroup as Pars Pro Toto: Projection from the Ingroup onto the Inclusive Category as a Precursor to Social Discrimination, in: Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 29, 461-473.