The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications

Cancer Journal from Scientific American

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 25-27

  Aref, Amr ^a,b   Youssef, Emad ^a   Washington, Tara ^a   Segel, Mark ^a   Grigorian, Cheryl ^a   Bongers, Shannon ^a   Bouwman, David ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving therapy; Microcalcifications

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR CALCINOSIS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0033964378     PISSN: 10814442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C et al. Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1581-1586.
2. Julien J, Bijker N, Sylvester R et al. The role of radiotherapy in breast conserving treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): first results of EORTC trial 10853 [abstract]. Presented at the 1st European Breast Cancer Conference, Florence, Italy. Eur J Cancer 1998;34[suppl 5]:S8.
3. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B et al. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:668-670.
4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond C et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with and without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 1456-1461.
5. Van Dongen J, Bartelink H, Fentimen I et al. Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992;11:8-15.
6. Blichert-Toft M, Brincker H, Andersen J et al. A Danish randomized trial comparing breast preserving therapy with mastectomy in mammary carcinoma. Acta Oncol 1988;27:671-677.
7. Lichter A, Lippman M, Danforth D et al. Mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:976-983.
8. Sarrazin D, Le M, Arriagada R et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 1989;14:177-184.
9. Winchester DP, Strom EA. Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:108-128.
10. Teixidor HS, Chu FC, Kim YS et al. The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy. Cancer 1992;69:1418-1423.
11. Hasselgren P-O, Hummel RP, Georgian-Smith D et al. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery 1993;114:836-842.
12. Gluck BS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L et al. Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Oncology 1993;188:469-472.
13. McCormick B, Rosen PP, Kinne D et al. Duct carcinoma in situ of the breast: an analysis of local control after conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21: 289-292.
14. Sneige N, McNeese MD, Atkinson EN et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy and irradiation: histopathological analysis of 49 specimens with emphasis on risk factors and long term results [review]. Hum Pathol 1995;26:642-649.